HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: IPutMoInYoA
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13131

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 315
BOT: 1
Total: 316
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Photo Albums
03: Home
04: Your Account
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Your Account
10: Home
11: Forums
12: News
13: Your Account
14: Forums
15: Home
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Your Account
19: Home
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Photo Albums
24: Home
25: Your Account
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Home
32: Forums
33: News
34: News
35: Photo Albums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Your Account
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Your Account
46: News
47: Home
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Home
51: Your Account
52: Your Account
53: News
54: Statistics
55: Home
56: Photo Albums
57: Your Account
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Home
62: Your Account
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Your Account
66: Your Account
67: Your Account
68: Your Account
69: Forums
70: Statistics
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Home
74: Your Account
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Photo Albums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Your Account
85: Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Photo Albums
89: Home
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Your Account
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Photo Albums
96: Your Account
97: Your Account
98: Photo Albums
99: Forums
100: Statistics
101: Your Account
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Home
106: Photo Albums
107: Home
108: Photo Albums
109: Home
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Home
113: News
114: Your Account
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Photo Albums
118: Home
119: Forums
120: News
121: Photo Albums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Statistics
125: Home
126: Forums
127: Home
128: Forums
129: Your Account
130: Forums
131: Your Account
132: Home
133: Home
134: Your Account
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: News
138: News
139: Your Account
140: News
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: News
145: Forums
146: Your Account
147: Forums
148: News
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: News
155: Forums
156: Home
157: Forums
158: Your Account
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Photo Albums
163: Your Account
164: Forums
165: Home
166: Forums
167: Articles: Topics
168: Your Account
169: Home
170: Your Account
171: Home
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Home
175: Forums
176: Photo Albums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Home
180: Your Account
181: Forums
182: Photo Albums
183: Photo Albums
184: Your Account
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Home
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Home
193: Your Account
194: Photo Albums
195: Your Account
196: Your Account
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Your Account
200: Forums
201: Your Account
202: Reloading Database
203: Forums
204: Your Account
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Photo Albums
208: Home
209: Forums
210: News
211: Photo Albums
212: Your Account
213: Photo Albums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Your Account
222: Photo Albums
223: Photo Albums
224: Your Account
225: Home
226: Your Account
227: Home
228: Your Account
229: Your Account
230: Photo Albums
231: Forums
232: Your Account
233: Forums
234: Members List
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Photo Albums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Home
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Home
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Your Account
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: News
253: Photo Albums
254: Your Account
255: Forums
256: Your Account
257: Home
258: Home
259: Forums
260: News
261: Treasury
262: Forums
263: Home
264: Photo Albums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Photo Albums
268: Forums
269: Home
270: Photo Albums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Home
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: PointBlank Online
277: Forums
278: Home
279: Photo Albums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Home
283: Your Account
284: Photo Albums
285: Home
286: Your Account
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Your Account
290: Home
291: Home
292: Forums
293: Home
294: Home
295: Statistics
296: News
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Photo Albums
300: Photo Albums
301: Your Account
302: Forums
303: Home
304: Forums
305: Privacy Policy
306: News
307: Forums
308: Home
309: News
310: Your Account
311: Forums
312: Statistics
313: Forums
314: Photo Albums
315: Forums
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824614
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down
Discussion that doesnt fit other Topics
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
g45_70
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: N.W. Montana

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm    Post subject: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Howdy Folks;

Seems a little chilly in here, so thought I'd throw a round or two on the fire.
I've owned and used many differant calibres and cases over the years. Some killed quicker that others, some were down right sorry. Some say it's not what your useing it's where you put the bullet has some truth to it. But lets get down and really look at the evadance.
Here's a web site that I copied the following artical from "http://www.eabco.com/Reports/report05.htm"

Sectional Densities and Velocities that Put Game Down - The 6.5X55 Swedish Mauser is famous for being an extremely reliable game stopper. I believe the reason it works so well is a combination of two factors: High Sectional Density and Medium Velocity. Here's a simple illustration of how it works:
If you shoot an aluminum pop can with a high velocity (800fps) air rifle, the pellet zips right through the can without disturbing it. Now, if you shoot that can with a low velocity BB gun at 300-400 fps, it will make a dent, rip a hole through, and knock the can over. Medium velocity actually puts more whack into the target!

After some thinking on the resultes of several deer shot with differant rifles I tend to agree. I've had more bang flops with heavy slow moving bullets than with lite fast "2900-3000+ fps" rounds, that's "point of impact velocitys."
Where I live it's all mostly heavy timber and brush, a long shot is 300 Yds.. Always thinking of the worse case senero, expecting that long range shot, I loaded up a 300 Win. Mag. with Speer 165's at 3100 fps.. I never got that long range shot and everything I did shoot was under 100 Yds. and out of 4-5 deer I never had a bang flop from one of them. Even though the lungs, liver and in some cases the heart were destroyed. Some traveled 100 Yds. Like they diden't know they'd been hit and were just spooked!!

I think that same bullet at 3100fps, would have delivered the needed shock, to drop the animals with in a few feet or yards had they been hit at say 300 Yds., at an impact velocity of 2400fps.
Check out the link above and let me know what you think!.........Gene>>>

_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6400
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Thats what my current believe is too.

I shoot mostly short distances, very very rarely further than 100 meters. And usually I shoot at pigs and goats.

Nowadays I use "slow" large diameter calibers such as 300 whisper , 45-70 (loaded to about 1200fps) and 45LC.

But on the other hand, I also shoots with fast calibers such as 223REM and 243Win.

At both instances, I have experienced both the "bang flop" and the "bang run flop" results. I cannot say which is more effective between the two

It is just with the slower cartridges it is a lot less noisy, a lot more kind to my shoulder, a tad more accurate (maybe because I wont flinch) and best of all, COST LESS to load. The bad point is that due to the rainbow trajectory, it is harder to shoot at further than 100 meters distance.

I am happy with what I use.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Deleted_User_2665
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 380

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:51 am    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Hammer stuff in the engine room and it dies...

Purty simple............................
Back to top
View user's profile
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1005
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:22 am    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

My experiences have been much the same. Those long, heavy-for-caliber bullets coasting along at 2,600 to 2,800 fps penetrate well and just plain seem to drop game. Do they drop game faster than the hyper-velocity crowd? Probably not, but they also don't shoot up as much meat, aren't as easily deflected by bone and can be shot better by more shooters since recoil is generally less. If nothing else, being able to be shot better increases the chances of lethal hits.

Cartridges using traditional loads like the 6.5 Swede and the 45/70 share common traits...long, heavy-for-bore size bullets at moderate velocities that penetrate extremely well without using premium bullets and reputations as efficient game getters. Those long bullets shed velocity much slower than shorter, lighter ones too, making them viable alternatives for extended range shooting if good range estimation is used. Success is hard to argue with.

As to deer running 100 yards or so even with fatal hits; deer don't understand that they are supposed to die when shot. A human being often will die from shock even with non-lethal hits because they know what a gunshot is and their mind talks them into dying. Deer are adrenaline driven and their first reaction to anything strange is flight. Once the adrenaline is flowing they can and will run a considerable distance until blood loss finishes the task. The only way that deer or other game can be dropped in their tracks is from a shot that generates sufficient damage to vital organs or spine to cause immediate and total neurological shut-down.

Whew! Guess that was more like 3 cents worth!

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
g45_70
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: N.W. Montana

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Those long, heavy-for-caliber bullets coasting along at 2,600 to 2,800 fps penetrate well and just plain seem to drop game. Do they drop game faster than the hyper-velocity crowd? Probably not.

SingleShotLover;

During the time I was using the .300 Win. Mag., I was teaching a young man how to hunt and where to place his shots. He was useing a .308 Win. loaded with the same 165s I was useing at about 2650fps. In 5 years he had 3 bang flops to my zero, all our critters were shot behind the shoulder. I never lost a deer, I just never got the bang flops he did!?
I've been hunting with a 7mm08 the last 3 years and so far have had 2 instant drops, using the Speer 160s at 2700fps. And the Little 7 only kills on one end of the rifle!! LOL!!! And like you say, minamal meat damage!!
It don't burn a hat full of powder either!!..................Gene.............

_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
g45_70
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: N.W. Montana

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

But on the other hand, I also shoots with fast calibers such as 223REM and 243Win.

gelandangan;

I have both of these rounds too, the 223 is in a 24" Bushmaster Varminter and the .243 in a 20" Remington bolt. I've yet to take a deer with the .243, though I have taken it out with that intent, the ocation just hasen't persented itself just yet. It sure raises cane with coyotes, I use the Hornaday 87gr. hollow points. I wonder how that pill would work on a deer?

I had an older Micro-Gruve Marlin 45/70 that I really liked. I used a 405gr. G.C. and Varget powder in it. Don't remember the charge, but it was a sure killer on elk and deer. I got talked out of that rifle on a trade, I do miss that ol girl!! Crying or Very sad But I'll get another! Razz .............Gene...............

_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
KYGunner
Member
Member


Joined: Dec 08, 2007
Posts: 99
Location: Elizabethtown, KY

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

I think the 270 wsm with 140 or 150 grain bullets is my "baby" for whitetail because it seems to be that middle ground or grey area. It is fast enough and heavy enough. I have killed about 12 deer (from small does to a nice wall hanger 12 pt.) I pride myself on taking good shots and have shot only one of these deer more than once. The gun just drops deer very efficiently.

_________________
KYGunner
"You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence"
-Abe Lincoln
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6400
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

g45-70

243 WIN can easily kill Fallow deers. Although I never use it for deer myself, but I saw many others who did.
I would not hesitate to use a 243 for deers.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

I hate the term, "knock down power". As if any bullet can actually knock an animal down. I have noticed there are two shots that go "bacg - flop" more often regardless of the caliber (hunting rifles) in use. Shoulder shots and well placed head and neck shots. Head and neck shots work best with a light for caliber bullet at moderate velocity and the shoulder shots work best with medium to heavy for caliber bullets again at moderate velocities.
I have a brother who can take down a moose at 100 yards with a 6mm x 30 and I can do the same thing with a 30-06 but we aren't hitting the animal in the same place. Shot placement, gun, and bullet design have to work together for clean, humane kills. Just like most other things in life it is most important to know your limits and learn to live within them.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
g45_70
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: N.W. Montana

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:41 am    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Forum FAQ Search You have no new messages Logout [ g45_70 ]
Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down
Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
g45_70
Rookie Member



Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: N.W. Montana
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Howdy Folks;

Seems a little chilly in here, so thought I'd throw a round or two on the fire.
I've owned and used many differant calibres and cases over the years. Some killed quicker that others, some were down right sorry. Some say it's not what your useing it's where you put the bullet has some truth to it. But lets get down and really look at the evadance.
Here's a web site that I copied the following artical from "http://www.eabco.com/Reports/report05.htm"

Sectional Densities and Velocities that Put Game Down - The 6.5X55 Swedish Mauser is famous for being an extremely reliable game stopper. I believe the reason it works so well is a combination of two factors: High Sectional Density and Medium Velocity. Here's a simple illustration of how it works:
If you shoot an aluminum pop can with a high velocity (800fps) air rifle, the pellet zips right through the can without disturbing it. Now, if you shoot that can with a low velocity BB gun at 300-400 fps, it will make a dent, rip a hole through, and knock the can over. Medium velocity actually puts more whack into the target!

After some thinking on the resultes of several deer shot with differant rifles I tend to agree. I've had more bang flops with heavy slow moving bullets than with lite fast "2900-3000+ fps" rounds, that's "point of impact velocitys."
Where I live it's all mostly heavy timber and brush, a long shot is 300 Yds.. Always thinking of the worse case senero, expecting that long range shot, I loaded up a 300 Win. Mag. with Speer 165's at 3100 fps.. I never got that long range shot and everything I did shoot was under 100 Yds. and out of 4-5 deer I never had a bang flop from one of them. Even though the lungs, liver and in some cases the heart were destroyed. Some traveled 100 Yds. Like they diden't know they'd been hit and were just spooked!!

I think that same bullet at 3100fps, would have delivered the needed shock, to drop the animals with in a few feet or yards had they been hit at say 300 Yds., at an impact velocity of 2400fps.
Check out the link above and let me know what you think!.........Gene>>>
_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."

Back to top

gelandangan
Super Member



Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 442
Location: Sydney Australia
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats what my current believe is too.

I shoot mostly short distances, very very rarely further than 100 meters. And usually I shoot at pigs and goats.

Nowadays I use "slow" large diameter calibers such as 300 whisper , 45-70 (loaded to about 1200fps) and 45LC.

But on the other hand, I also shoots with fast calibers such as 223REM and 243Win.

At both instances, I have experienced both the "bang flop" and the "bang run flop" results. I cannot say which is more effective between the two

It is just with the slower cartridges it is a lot less noisy, a lot more kind to my shoulder, a tad more accurate (maybe because I wont flinch) and best of all, COST LESS to load. The bad point is that due to the rainbow trajectory, it is harder to shoot at further than 100 meters distance.

I am happy with what I use.
_________________
I fish therefore I lie ...

Back to top

wildswalker
Super Member



Joined: May 05, 2006
Posts: 305
Location: Paradise
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hammer stuff in the engine room and it dies...

Purty simple............................

Back to top

SingleShotLover
Rookie Member



Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 21
Location: Illinois
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:22 am Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My experiences have been much the same. Those long, heavy-for-caliber bullets coasting along at 2,600 to 2,800 fps penetrate well and just plain seem to drop game. Do they drop game faster than the hyper-velocity crowd? Probably not, but they also don't shoot up as much meat, aren't as easily deflected by bone and can be shot better by more shooters since recoil is generally less. If nothing else, being able to be shot better increases the chances of lethal hits.

Cartridges using traditional loads like the 6.5 Swede and the 45/70 share common traits...long, heavy-for-bore size bullets at moderate velocities that penetrate extremely well without using premium bullets and reputations as efficient game getters. Those long bullets shed velocity much slower than shorter, lighter ones too, making them viable alternatives for extended range shooting if good range estimation is used. Success is hard to argue with.

As to deer running 100 yards or so even with fatal hits; deer don't understand that they are supposed to die when shot. A human being often will die from shock even with non-lethal hits because they know what a gunshot is and their mind talks them into dying. Deer are adrenaline driven and their first reaction to anything strange is flight. Once the adrenaline is flowing they can and will run a considerable distance until blood loss finishes the task. The only way that deer or other game can be dropped in their tracks is from a shot that generates sufficient damage to vital organs or spine to cause immediate and total neurological shut-down.

Whew! Guess that was more like 3 cents worth!
_________________
SSL

Back to top

g45_70
Rookie Member



Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: N.W. Montana
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:37 pm Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those long, heavy-for-caliber bullets coasting along at 2,600 to 2,800 fps penetrate well and just plain seem to drop game. Do they drop game faster than the hyper-velocity crowd? Probably not.

SingleShotLover;

During the time I was using the .300 Win. Mag., I was teaching a young man how to hunt and where to place his shots. He was useing a .308 Win. loaded with the same 165s I was useing at about 2650fps. In 5 years he had 3 bang flops to my zero, all our critters were shot behind the shoulder. I never lost a deer, I just never got the bang flops he did!?
I've been hunting with a 7mm08 the last 3 years and so far have had 2 instant drops, using the Speer 160s at 2700fps. And the Little 7 only kills on one end of the rifle!! LOL!!! And like you say, minamal meat damage!!
It don't burn a hat full of powder either!!..................Gene.............
_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."

Back to top

g45_70
Rookie Member



Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: N.W. Montana
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But on the other hand, I also shoots with fast calibers such as 223REM and 243Win.

gelandangan;

I have both of these rounds too, the 223 is in a 24" Bushmaster Varminter and the .243 in a 20" Remington bolt. I've yet to take a deer with the .243, though I have taken it out with that intent, the ocation just hasen't persented itself just yet. It sure raises cane with coyotes, I use the Hornaday 87gr. hollow points. I wonder how that pill would work on a deer?

I had an older Micro-Gruve Marlin 45/70 that I really liked. I used a 405gr. G.C. and Varget powder in it. Don't remember the charge, but it was a sure killer on elk and deer. I got talked out of that rifle on a trade, I do miss that ol girl!! But I'll get another! .............Gene...............
_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."

Back to top

KYGunner
Member



Joined: Dec 08, 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:52 pm Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the 270 wsm with 140 or 150 grain bullets is my "baby" for whitetail because it seems to be that middle ground or grey area. It is fast enough and heavy enough. I have killed about 12 deer (from small does to a nice wall hanger 12 pt.) I pride myself on taking good shots and have shot only one of these deer more than once. The gun just drops deer very efficiently.
_________________
KYGunner
"You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence"
-Abe Lincoln

Back to top

gelandangan
Super Member



Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 442
Location: Sydney Australia
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
g45-70

243 WIN can easily kill Fallow deers. Although I never use it for deer myself, but I saw many others who did.
I would not hesitate to use a 243 for deers.
_________________
I fish therefore I lie ...

Back to top

PaulS;
I agree, the term knock down power is a farce at best and a deer wounded with a .223 is just as wounded as if hit with an /06, in a bad spot.
I've yet to make a so called "Texas heart shot" and think such a shot ought to be avoided, even at the cost of an empty frying pan. Such a shot can cause alot of meat waste and one heck of a mess for sure!
Good hunting!.....................................................Gene.....................

_________________
When a well packaged web of lies sold gradually to the masses, over generations, the truth, will seem utterly perposterous, and its speaker a raving lunitic.

Thomas Jefferson:
"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Grayfox97128
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:18 am    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

When its all said and done the true difference in so called killing power is mostly bullet design. Almost any cartridge can be made to kill quickly with a bullet that starts expanding at impact without blowing up, and expands as it go's all the way through the game. Expansion is not as important with large calibers because simply, they are already expanded in a way before they hit. I have killed deer, elk, coyotes with many different cartridges in the last 40 years and have realized that what particular cartridge I am using is really not very important as long as I have the right bullet in a good handling accurate rifle.


Last edited by Grayfox97128 on Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6400
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Gidday Grayfox.

Welcome to the fire.. grab a log or just sit on Bushy's lap Razz

Whatever cartridge or caliber selected, it must ensure that there is enough energy to send the bullet into the fatal area and create the required damages to kill the animal correctly and quickly.

Expansion of bullets I think is just the way it is designed to transfer the kinetic energy on to the target. The larger the surface area, the easier the energy is transferred.
Energy transferred in to the wound channel shape and size, the breaking of hard or resilient materials (hair, skin, fat, and bone) and shock into the body of the target, which may result in a kill.

Larger bullet diameter will also help us direct the damages onto the right area. Viz. You could theoretically kill a deer with a bicycle spoke provided that you could direct your thrust into the right spot and sever the right nerve or disrupt the right point in the heart or brain. However, this is impossible to be done from a distance further than your arms reach (with me, even its in my arms reach I could not do it). So, a large bullet gives you a higher probability to get to the right area.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Grayfox97128
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

Thank You for the welcome,
I wish I had found this site sooner...kinda sad really....
I have been using the Point Blank program for a few years and had never been to this site. (I got it from a friend)
Back to top
View user's profile
Grayfox97128
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Trajectory, Meat Damage, and Knock-Down Reply with quote

An interesting question? Meat Damage??? I figure if I killed the game quick and got the penetration I thought was right, whatever damage the bullet made was just right. I would rather blow away half the meat that lose a whole animal.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.