HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: IPutMoInYoA
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13131

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 243
BOT: 1
Total: 244
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Your Account
06: Home
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Photo Albums
11: Photo Albums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Your Account
15: Your Account
16: Home
17: Photo Albums
18: Photo Albums
19: Forums
20: Photo Albums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Photo Albums
25: Home
26: Your Account
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Home
33: Photo Albums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Photo Albums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Photo Albums
43: Photo Albums
44: Your Account
45: Forums
46: Home
47: Photo Albums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Photo Albums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Your Account
57: Your Account
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Photo Albums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Photo Albums
75: Home
76: Forums
77: Photo Albums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Your Account
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Photo Albums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Photo Albums
88: Forums
89: Home
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Photo Albums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Photo Albums
100: Photo Albums
101: Photo Albums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Photo Albums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Home
111: Your Account
112: Photo Albums
113: Photo Albums
114: Home
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Home
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Photo Albums
123: Forums
124: Your Account
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Photo Albums
132: Home
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Your Account
136: Photo Albums
137: Photo Albums
138: Your Account
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Your Account
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Home
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Home
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Home
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Home
171: Your Account
172: Home
173: Forums
174: Your Account
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Your Account
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Your Account
188: Forums
189: Home
190: Home
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: News
198: Forums
199: Your Account
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Photo Albums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Home
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Photo Albums
214: Forums
215: Home
216: Photo Albums
217: Your Account
218: Forums
219: Home
220: Forums
221: Photo Albums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Home
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Photo Albums
243: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824590
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Recoil Reduction For Load Development
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
ouch ouch ouch ..your brother was lucky he didnt bust a collar bone or something.

what range/distance to you intend to be shooting to???
that will give you two parts of your equation the other being "elk sized"
1.25" is not to be sneezed at..thats a fine 3-400yard kill shot in anyones book.

Ideally, all shots would be within 200 yqards. But now having hunted here this past season, I realize that 300-400 yard shots are not all that uncommon.

Am I ready for this??

Hell NO!! I had to pass on a couple shots this past year because I just didn't feel right.

But I would like to eventually get there, and intend to practice this year out to 500 once I get everything set up.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Please remember, I moved from a shotgun-only state where a 100 yard shot is considered long, Even though my equipment was capable, you just don't normally get a chance at a deer in Ohio at much longer range.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

hunterjoe21 wrote:
I realize that 300-400 yard shots are not all that uncommon.

Why do you need a .300 Win Mag for that? Those are distances I have shot all my elk with using a .270 Win and Hornady GMX or Barnes LRX bullets. I had 34" of penetration with the GMX at 400 yards on one harvest.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9258
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

mate you will do just fine n dandy
3-400yards is well doable and I believe you wont need a super duper hot load to do it with ease...those 200ish grn pills you were mentioning at a reasonable pace ...not superhot just nice n accurate will have plenty heaps of ooomph to do the bizzo .I will have a squizz what the latest guff on them is and flick you a pm.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
hunterjoe21 wrote:
I realize that 300-400 yard shots are not all that uncommon.

Why do you need a .300 Win Mag for that? Those are distances I have shot all my elk with using a .270 Win and Hornady GMX or Barnes LRX bullets. I had 34" of penetration with the GMX at 400 yards on one harvest.


Because I have one...and have always wanted one

Are you giving me permission to go get a .270?

Cause I will... Wink Wink Very Happy

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:17 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

hunterjoe21 wrote:
My original intent was to work up a load using a Barnes 165 gr TTSX. They seem to be almost impossible to find though. No one around here stocks them (168 grain TSX's are everywhere), but I remember reading somewhere that the 165 TTSX/TSX was developed with the .300 Win Mag in mind.

The.300 Win Mag was SAMMI'd back when bullets didn't have longer ogives. The 165 TTSX fits the SAMMI COAL. The ogive on the 168 TTSX is longer like more modern bullets. Magazine length in some .300 WM are often longer to accommodate modern low-drag bullets. You might be able to fit the 168 TTSX in your action if your magazine is long enough. The 168 expands slightly better than the 165.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:20 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

hunterjoe21 wrote:
Are you giving me permission to go get a .270?

My elk hunting partner uses a .300 Win Mag. He shoots the .223 and 6.8 pretty accurately but when he gets behind the .300 Win Mag he doesn't shoot near as well. The recoil is a challenge for him.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9258
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 11:50 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

so it sounds like you might be better off doing some slightly less potent load development for him too there young slim...... LOL

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
http://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/Hold+that+Forend.html

Elvis,

Thanks for the link. There's plenty of interesting reading there.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1065
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 8:43 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
hunterjoe21 wrote:
Are you giving me permission to go get a .270?

My elk hunting partner uses a .300 Win Mag. He shoots the .223 and 6.8 pretty accurately but when he gets behind the .300 Win Mag he doesn't shoot near as well. The recoil is a challenge for him.


I have not used a Win mag very often but need to get a load identified for my son to use when he gets home form deployment. I intend to get solid data out to 500 yards but do not plan to shoot 30 at a time... I know it is more fun to work up a load but just asking here...What factory ammo loads would you recommend for Elk? If I can get 6" group at 500 yards with a good bullet in factory ammo .... I think I would call it done..





Edit to add... a quick show 180 gr. TTSX and 200 gr ELD factory loads available. While I am sure both bullets will do the job if properly placed... which would you shoot?


second edit to add.... I looked at muzzle energy of the 178 ELD in 30-06 versus the 200 gr. 300Win mag... 600 foot pounds more ME in the Win mag... I think I will borrow my buddies Win Mag rather than take my -06 like I had planned...

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

My buddy uses 165 GMX Superformance and meets the accuracy goals you desire. I'm a meat hunter so choose monolithic bullets. The recoil is pretty stout with the Superformance and 165 GMX. He shot an elk at 100 yards head-on and the GMX penetrated the full length and was caught by the rear hide. ELD-X bullets will fragment and likely lose their core.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Did you see the single powder charge velocity ladder I did with the ELD-X? You can save a lot of bullets and time that way.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Dawgdad wrote:
slimjim wrote:
hunterjoe21 wrote:
Are you giving me permission to go get a .270?

My elk hunting partner uses a .300 Win Mag. He shoots the .223 and 6.8 pretty accurately but when he gets behind the .300 Win Mag he doesn't shoot near as well. The recoil is a challenge for him.


I have not used a Win mag very often but need to get a load identified for my son to use when he gets home form deployment. I intend to get solid data out to 500 yards but do not plan to shoot 30 at a time... I know it is more fun to work up a load but just asking here...What factory ammo loads would you recommend for Elk? If I can get 6" group at 500 yards with a good bullet in factory ammo .... I think I would call it done..





Edit to add... a quick show 180 gr. TTSX and 200 gr ELD factory loads available. While I am sure both bullets will do the job if properly placed... which would you shoot?


second edit to add.... I looked at muzzle energy of the 178 ELD in 30-06 versus the 200 gr. 300Win mag... 600 foot pounds more ME in the Win mag... I think I will borrow my buddies Win Mag rather than take my -06 like I had planned...

Are you looking for a factory load? Or have you settled on the 300 factory load with the with the 200 gr ELDX.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1065
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:25 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

I have not tried any factory loads other than the Remington 180Gr PSP to get it on paper.

I have a boat load of once fired Federal brass left on the range by Seal sniper training group at Camp Atterbury. I snagged some Berger 190's on a good price. I have some IMR4350 and 7828SSC and will do the single bullet work up like Slim does.

But for as few rounds as I plan to shoot in this rifle.. If factory ammo shoots sub MOA - that saves me a bunch of work.. and barrel life.

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

I hunted with Federals 180 gr Trophy Bonded Tip this past season. It shot 1.25" groups from my rifle and that was after a long day at the range. I could probably get it to shoot better if my shoulder hadn't started bothering me.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.