HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: patrad69
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13133

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 137
BOT: 2
Total: 139
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Home
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Statistics
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Home
11: Home
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Home
17: Forums
18: Home
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Home
22: Photo Albums
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Photo Albums
28: Your Account
29: Forums
30: Home
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Your Account
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Photo Albums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Your Account
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Your Account
62: Forums
63: Photo Albums
64: Forums
65: Photo Albums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Your Account
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Home
73: Home
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Your Account
77: Forums
78: Photo Albums
79: Photo Albums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Home
86: Forums
87: Your Account
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Home
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Your Account
102: Photo Albums
103: Photo Albums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Statistics
109: Home
110: Forums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Home
116: Forums
117: Home
118: Forums
119: Home
120: Home
121: Your Account
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Home
125: Photo Albums
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Photo Albums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Your Account
134: Forums
135: Home
136: Forums
137: Your Account
  BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 825021
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not)
Discussion that doesnt fit other Topics
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:39 pm    Post subject: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303755504579208602749375392?mod=e2tw&mobile=y

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Vince
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 15725
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:54 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

This does not bode well for firearms owners. The way I see it, there is no argument about rights to own a handgun being infringed... It's just that you will have to pay a motza for the gun and watch if you want one. No doubt the ANTIs will lobby to have similar technology retro fitted to existing firearms "if you wish to own a firearm".

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9261
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

link didnt work for me??

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6401
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

copy it and paste to the address bar

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6401
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:39 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

To the topic.
I bet you within two months after the guns are available, the security cutoff will be hacked and breached.
Its only good security for the morons, wont stop smarter crims.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Suzanne
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Posts: 3323
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:50 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

Exactly Geland and what about the non-secure guns we already own? Turn them in? Don't think that'll happen. Making ammo scarce and guns too expensive and ridiculous to own, seems to rock their world. In an emergency when you need the gun, you may as well have it in a safe, it's not always going to be ready to fire and people are going to wake up dead if they rely on this as self defense. What keeps someone from taking the thing apart and rigging it back to a normal gun? If you can't take it apart, it's another accident waiting to happen. POS if you ask me.


and I
don't
talk
that
way

Suz

_________________
May the moon keep you centered,
May the sun keep you dancing,
And the stars shed light on your dreams.
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5002
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

If the thing is activated remotely (from the watch) it can be DEACTIVATED remotely also. How long would it take someone (like maybe an oppressive government, besides a crook) to figure out how to override the owner's signal? I'll never own one.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6401
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
If the thing is activated remotely (from the watch) it can be DEACTIVATED remotely also. How long would it take someone (like maybe an oppressive government, besides a crook) to figure out how to override the owner's signal? I'll never own one.

IMHO
To make it to go bang every time it will take not more than 24 hours with 100% cosmetic preserved, or 30 minutes with no care of cosmetic.
You simply open the gun and remove the blocking device, and add whatever needed to make it work.

To make it NOT to go bang, from a good distance away (3 - 7 meters) should be doable within 24 hours, 10 - 25 meters would need at least 2 months.
Near field RF can be jammed quite easily with white noise, and with jamming, the signal would not pass from the watch to the gun.
Far RF field would need higher power directional jammer, this might be a bit more to design.

I think the idea of the lock is 100% flop.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

gelandangan wrote:
I think the idea of the lock is 100% flop.

+1

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

$1300 for a $400 handgun IF it is accurate and IF it will continue to work for the 50 - 100 years that most handguns last. We are supposed to pay twice as much for the safety feature than we do for a comparable gun? Really?

Why would anyone think that they could sell such a product in a market that is ripe with good solid guns at a third of the price? When the go out of business what then? If the guns are no longer available do we get to go back to real guns?

Let the police and military test them out if they are such a good idea.....

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
inthedark
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Posts: 917
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:41 am    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

+1 PaulS

_________________
Chimo
Ron

War is sweet to those who have no experience of it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach - Pindar 518-438 BC

Be Copy now of Men of Grosser Blood and TEACH THEM HOW TO WAR
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

PaulS wrote:
Let the police and military test them out if they are such a good idea.....

Spot on good idea.. Laughing

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

I can see it now:

cop, "hold it for a second, I have to re-enter my code because I have been on duty for more than eight hours."

What a STUPID idea!

Or better yet: "darn it I broke my watch - now my gun won't work...."

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
English Mike
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 1709
Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

With upwards of 200 million "dumb" handguns already in the US, this will do absolutely NOTHING to reduce crime rates.
It could lead to more violent crime where owners of this joke are tortured for the code needed to go with the gun.

[Tinfoil Hat] How long before the NSA has a "backdoor" code that can disable ALL these so-called "smart" guns?[/Tinfoil Hat]
Back to top
View user's profile
inthedark
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Posts: 917
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Just the type of handgun technology we need .... (not) Reply with quote

Brilliant
English Mike wrote:
With upwards of 200 million "dumb" handguns already in the US, this will do absolutely NOTHING to reduce crime rates.
It could lead to more violent crime where owners of this joke are tortured for the code needed to go with the gun.

[Tinfoil Hat] How long before the NSA has a "backdoor" code that can disable ALL these so-called "smart" guns?[/Tinfoil Hat]
Party Brilliant
Faint

_________________
Chimo
Ron

War is sweet to those who have no experience of it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach - Pindar 518-438 BC

Be Copy now of Men of Grosser Blood and TEACH THEM HOW TO WAR
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.