View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
denis Member


Joined: Sep 30, 2008 Posts: 40 Location: Columbia, MO
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:25 pm Post subject: New Ruger |
|
I was able to extend my long-time love of Ruger firearms this past weekend by acquiring a GP100 stainless steel revolver with a 4" barrel. Based on its serial number I estimate it was manufactured late 1991.
I ran a box of Magtech .38 caliber 158gr LRN and a few cylinders of Independence .357 magnum 158gr JSP. The Independence cartridges used CCI primers (which detail will become apparent soon).
This revolver had been given a trigger job and it felt and shot sweet using the Magtech .38 rounds. When I started shooting the .357 there were two instances (in about half a box) where the primer was only barely dimpled, and when I repositioned the cylinder and tried again, they fired. Even when they had successfully fired, the dimple in the primer was still a little shallow. When I compared the fired Magtechs and Independence brass, the Magtechs were all consistent in dimple size and depth but there was a fair amont of variability with the CCI-primed Independence brass. CCI has a reputation for hardness, and I suspect that the trigger job was optimized for target ammunition with softer primers.
I think I will see about installing a little stiffer mainspring. The spring kits are cheap, and the instructions are pretty straightforward. I plan on feeding my GP100 a lot of wadcutter handloads so I'll have a bit of control as to individual components, but I feel I need to at least ensure that any ammunition will fire consistently.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Handloader Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005 Posts: 1032 Location: Phoenix, Arizona
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:02 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
Congrats on the GP100 denis. Ruger DAs are hell for strong and always seem to deliver good accuracy. You bring up a good point about the trigger and light primer strikes.
Far too often lighter mainsprings are chosen as a less expensive way to get a lighter trigger pull. Good trigger jobs take patience and a little time to perform. OTOH, my opinion is that some trigger pulls can be far too light if the firearm is used for PD or hunting. While we each have our preferences, I like my working revolvers no lighter than 4lbs.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pumpkinslinger Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 4956 Location: NC foothills
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denis Member


Joined: Sep 30, 2008 Posts: 40 Location: Columbia, MO
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:16 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
Handloader wrote: |
Far too often lighter mainsprings are chosen as a less expensive way to get a lighter trigger pull. Good trigger jobs take patience and a little time to perform. OTOH, my opinion is that some trigger pulls can be far too light if the firearm is used for PD or hunting. While we each have our preferences, I like my working revolvers no lighter than 4lbs. |
Fortunately this trigger job was a little more involved than changing out the mainspring.
One of the benefits to living in Columbia MO is that I can go onto the MidwayUSA web site, place an order, and pick it up 3 hours later at the loading dock. So I ordered the Wilson Combat Custom-tune spring set which allowed me to put in a somewhat stiffer mainspring.
This'll give me the peace of mind knowing that even CCI primers will fire consistently. The trigger still feels smooth for the entire pull, which is still far better than I enjoyed 30 years ago with my S&W Model 19.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denis Member


Joined: Sep 30, 2008 Posts: 40 Location: Columbia, MO
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
Pumpkinslinger wrote: |
Denis, I watched my buddy shoot a 0.75" group with his 6" GP-100 at 25 yards, off a rest. If he'll give me the load I'll pass it on. If he won't I'll steal it from him next time we go to the range... |
That's not bad! I look forward to hearing what his load was.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hunterjoe21 Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Posts: 1486 Location: Miles City, Montana
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:58 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
denis,
I recently sold mine (it had a 6" barrel) and, even though I received good $ for it, I still regret doing it.
_________________ My 1911 is more effective than your 911. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brewmaster2 Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 24, 2009 Posts: 5 Location: Roseburg Oregon
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pumpkinslinger Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 4956 Location: NC foothills
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:24 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
Brewmaster, to be honest I clean the bore once before I try it and then just shoot 'em and clean 'em.
_________________ Mike
"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brewmaster2 Rookie Member


Joined: Jan 24, 2009 Posts: 5 Location: Roseburg Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
That is what I have done in the past and it seems to work out great. Guess that is what I will keep on doing. Thanlk you for the input..
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
whichfinger Rookie Member


Joined: Jun 13, 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: New Ruger |
|
Pumpkinslinger wrote: |
Brewmaster, to be honest I clean the bore once before I try it and then just shoot 'em and clean 'em. |
That's what I do, especially with my handguns - I don't have the patience to be anal about it.  For my long guns I fire 5, run a boresnake 3 times, fire 5, boresnake 3, fire 10, boresnake 3, and call it good. Might upset some people, but they don't have to shoot my guns. 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|