HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: deathloads
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13139

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 378
BOT: 1
Total: 379
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Home
04: Statistics
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Home
09: Forums
10: Home
11: Photo Albums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Home
15: Your Account
16: Home
17: Your Account
18: Your Account
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Home
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Home
33: Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Tell a Friend
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: State F&G Agencies
44: Home
45: Forums
46: Home
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Home
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Home
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Statistics
60: Home
61: Home
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Home
69: Photo Albums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Forums
78: Home
79: Forums
80: Home
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Photo Albums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Home
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Forums
103: Home
104: Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Your Account
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Home
112: Forums
113: Home
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Home
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Home
122: Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Forums
129: Home
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Your Account
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Photo Albums
136: Home
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Photo Albums
140: Forums
141: Home
142: Photo Albums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Home
151: Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Forums
155: Photo Albums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Home
160: Your Account
161: Home
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Your Account
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Forums
171: Home
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Home
177: Forums
178: Home
179: Statistics
180: Forums
181: Photo Albums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Photo Albums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Photo Albums
191: News
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Home
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Photo Albums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Photo Albums
205: Home
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Home
211: Your Account
212: Home
213: News
214: Home
215: Home
216: Home
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Home
220: Photo Albums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Forums
226: Home
227: Home
228: Forums
229: Home
230: Home
231: Forums
232: Home
233: Forums
234: Your Account
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Home
238: Forums
239: Home
240: Forums
241: Home
242: Photo Albums
243: Home
244: Forums
245: Statistics
246: Forums
247: Home
248: Forums
249: Home
250: Home
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Home
254: Forums
255: Home
256: Home
257: Forums
258: Home
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Home
268: Forums
269: Photo Albums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Home
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Photo Albums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Home
282: Photo Albums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Home
286: Forums
287: Home
288: Forums
289: Home
290: Forums
291: Forums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Home
298: Photo Albums
299: Photo Albums
300: Forums
301: Home
302: Photo Albums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Home
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: News
311: Home
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: News
315: Photo Albums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Photo Albums
325: Forums
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Home
329: Forums
330: Home
331: Forums
332: Home
333: Home
334: Forums
335: News
336: Home
337: Photo Albums
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Home
344: Photo Albums
345: News
346: Forums
347: Photo Albums
348: Forums
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Home
355: Forums
356: Your Account
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Home
362: Forums
363: Forums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Forums
367: Forums
368: Your Account
369: Photo Albums
370: Home
371: Forums
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: Photo Albums
375: Forums
376: Home
377: Forums
378: Forums
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2458
  · Views: 825189
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

Load Testing at What Distance?
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:29 am    Post subject: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Bullets can stabilize or destablize between 100 and 200yds. It is not uncommon to find that the 100yd accuracy can improve at 200yds or vice versa. I have two rifles that shoot MOA at 100 and 1/2 MOA at 200, IOW, the same size groups. With one other, accuracy deteriorates.

Often we have reloaders come into the store and show us targets where group sizes more than double between the two distances. Sometimes they are triple or quadruple the 100yd groups. Less common is for a rifle to shoot the same size group at both distances, but, we see that as well.
Barrel/rifle quality, conditions and optics play a role here as well as the shooter's bench techniques. That said, I believe that some bullet's yaw will settle down or be amplified as it continues downrange.

I believe testing for accuracy at 200yds is more revealing than 100yds and a more valid indicator.
Back to top
View user's profile
Spacedone
Member
Member


Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: 266
Location: missouri

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:32 am    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

i find that depends on the bullet design.

short range bullets {round nose} i like to group at 75 yards and at 150 yards.

long range bullets i like to group at 150 and at 250 yards.

i find that when i do this using a scope that i get the best consistancy with all loads i use.

now remember this is for hunting.

for target shooting i set my round to shoot best at the range i will be shooting most.

for practice/target shooting i want 1 inch or less groups but for hunting large game im more concerned with hitting the kill zone {6 inches} while retaining the most energy for the max range i expect to shoot {300 yards}

i use for large game 60 year old enfield war guns and can achieve 1 inch groups at 200 yards off a bench with max energy about 1800 Foot pounds.

350 yards being my guns max effective range against elk sized game.

i find setting my scope to shoot 1 inch high at 50 yards allows me to hit the kill zone at longer ranges {300 yards} more reliably. ie 1 inch high at 50 yards allows me to drop my bullet into the target with the least amount of percieved drop {10 inches} at 300 yards.

i believe there is a difference in target accuraccy and hunting killability.
Back to top
View user's profile MSN Messenger
Crackshot
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 1693
Location: Mich

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:38 am    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Pick your bullet, load some rounds, check accuracy at 100,200,300. If they do not performe at all above stated distances, I switch bullets till they do, I also taylor the bullet to the game"we all know that" be supprised how many dont know that!

_________________
The human mind is the weapon, the gun is just one of its tools.
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Coyote_Hunter_
Member
Member


Joined: Mar 05, 2005
Posts: 208
Location: Franktown, CO

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Handloader wrote:
Bullets can stabilize or destablize between 100 and 200yds. It is not uncommon to find that the 100yd accuracy can improve at 200yds or vice versa. I have two rifles that shoot MOA at 100 and 1/2 MOA at 200, IOW, the same size groups. With one other, accuracy deteriorates.

Often we have reloaders come into the store and show us targets where group sizes more than double between the two distances. Sometimes they are triple or quadruple the 100yd groups. Less common is for a rifle to shoot the same size group at both distances, but, we see that as well.
Barrel/rifle quality, conditions and optics play a role here as well as the shooter's bench techniques. That said, I believe that some bullet's yaw will settle down or be amplified as it continues downrange.

I believe testing for accuracy at 200yds is more revealing than 100yds and a more valid indicator.

At my range there is a distinct disadvantage to shooting for accuracy at 200 yards – the wind. It is a rare day when it stops gusting at the 200-yard range. Since wind deflection is non-linear, the deflection at 200 yards can easily be 400% greater than at 100 yards. Might explain some of those 200-yard groups you are seeing, too.

While I have heard the claim before, I have never subscribed to the belief that a rifle will shoot better at long ranges than at short ranges, in this case 1MOA @ 100 and 1/2MOA at 200. The physics would not only require that the bullets would somehow alter course in mid-flight, but that they would all alter course toward the same point! It is my belief that there are other factors a work. I know that I have shot groups with a smaller MOA measurement at longer distances and I know it had NOTHING to do with the bullets altering their path in mid-flight. In my case the explanation could be found in the sighting devices and targets used, which were simply a better match at 200 than at 100.

Regardless, I think it is a good idea to check accuracy out as far as you are willing to take a shot at game. You might find out that a 400-yard shot is no big deal under the right circumstances and you might find out that you have no business shooting past 200. (In which case the remedy is generally more practice.)

_________________
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JO422
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:51 am    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

I've seen the same thing happen that Handloader mentioned. The cases that I have seen is bullets that shoot a larger group at 100 yards (1.5 moa) and they the n have a significantly better group at 200 yards (.33 MOA) and then .5 moa at 300 yards. Invariably this has been with heavier bullets that are being shot with a realtively slow rate of twist in the rifle barrel. The rifling failed to stabilize the heavy bullet at 100. By the time it reached 200 yards the bullet was stabilized and showing what kind of accuracy the rifle was capable of.

A way to solve the 100 yard poor grouping delimma is to use lighter bullets that match the twist rates of your rifle barrel. You will need to experement, as each rifle has its own preferences. I have 2 identical rifles in .223 with barrels from the same manufacturer. One likes the SMK 52 gr while the other prefers a 55 gr Sierra Blitz King.
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

The rpm of a bullet changes a lot slower than the forward velocity does. Usually too fast a spin will cause accuracy problems at close range but will "settle in" between 100 and 200 yards. I have never seen a bullet that was stable at 100 become unstable at 200. I am a believer in faster twist is better - for that very reason - and I have had very good luck with bullets that should have fallen into the "over-stablized" group. A good example of this is a 358 Winchester that I have with a 1:12 twist. It is set up for the 180 grain Hornady spire point and the Speer 180 grain flatpoint bullets as ideal. I loaded some 158 grain JHP pistol bullets at 2500+ fps and found that they grouped at .33 at 100 yards and 5/8 inch (.625) at 200 yards.
It surprised me because I expected these to be spun so fast that they would be ok for plinking but these are sub caliber groups at 100 yards and nearly 1/4 MOA at 200 yards. If the bullets were a bit better constructed I could hunt with them - If I wanted to limit my shots to head and neck shots I could easily hunt game - large and small - with this round. The expansion of the 158 grain bullets is explosive! They turn to fragments in 8 to 12 inches with the base (58 to 61 grains) going to a maximum distance of 15 inches in my Fackler box using salt water.
The 180 grain bullets are vey good at 2700 FPS for large game and the Speer produces slightly better groups.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
popgun
Member
Member


Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Mitchell, GA, U.S.A. (2007 pop. 191)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:33 am    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

I have seen the difference in accuracy improve at 200 and 300 over the 100 yard groups.

I recently read Dan Newberry's article about Optimal Charge Weight (OCW Method of Load Development). It is a very interesting article and I recommend that you guys read it and even do some testing yourself. I have not had the opportunity to try the OCW method yet but will try it on a couple of rifles that I have rounds loaded up and ready for testing using his recommendations. Shucks! I will try anything to squeeze out a little better accuracy out of my rifles. Very Happy

Here is the link to the article

Dan Newberry's article on the OCW Method of Load Development

After you read the article I think you will see the reasons we see the accuracy improvement at 200 and 300 in some guns and not in others. His reasoning is that the wrong accuracy node was chosen when developing the loads in the guns that did not show good accuracy at longer ranges. I know that I have seen more than one accuracy node when developing loads at the range. He and his friend, Engineer Chris Long, have put allot of work into the testing of his theory and it seems to have merit.

_________________
Safe shooting,
Chris Young, aka: popgun, Moderator
I don't know everything but I have made most of the mistakes already and lived through many of them.
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
1895ss
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Posts: 2612
Location: Not Here...!!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:05 am    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Very interesting article popgun, it certainly looks like it's worth checking out. Thanks

_________________
A cruel truth is much more desirable than a really nice lie.
'Tis far better to walk alone than to follow a crowd or an a**hole going the wrong way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

The OCW information is available on this website as well. Check it out under "articles" on the home page. I believe there is merit is some of his conclusions.

Townsend Whelen also conducted experiments on bullet yaw and found enough evidence to conclude that under some circumstances bullets stablized further downrange. The example often used is that of the old fashioned top, the one that had you winding string around it, then throwing in on a hard surface. Often, initially, the top would wobble upon landing and then balance or center itself, the, go unstable as the spin rate decreased. Perhaps, something similar is occuring with firearms as well.
Back to top
View user's profile
Gil Martin
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 1841
Location: Schnecksville, PA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

It depends. With centerfire rifles I start at 50 yards then move to 100 then 200 and rarely shoot at 300 yards. We just do not get many 300 yard shots around here. If I were going out west or up north, I would try 300 yard shots. All the best...
Gil

_________________
Gil
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

I test loads for more things than just grouping. What I test for determines the range at which I test them.

I check group size first at 100 yards - that is the range that most of my shooting is done and hunting shots are usually within that range as well.

I test my loads for penetration and expansion at 25, 50, 75 and 100 yards in a salt water Fackler Box.

I test for velocity at 5 yards

I test for consistancy at 200, 100 and 50 yards over a long period of short sessions with 10 or less rounds fired at each of the many sessions.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

PaulS wrote:


I test my loads for penetration and expansion at 25, 50, 75 and 100 yards in a salt water Fackler Box.
.

Hi PaulS

Please tell me about "Fackler Box". I don't know what it is or how it is constructed.

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Handloader,

A Fackler Box is a framework to hold one gallon freezer bags filled with water - in my case salt-water. The concept is that you fire a bullet into the end of the box and it reacts as it impacts the bags in a way that is proportionally consistant with the bullets impact with soft tissue in game.

Testing the integrity and penetration in this way gives repeatable and consistant evaluation of a bullets capability on game when fired into the soft tissues of the vitals. When different bullets are fired into the same media the results can be compared in a manner that is representative of real life results.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Deleted_User_2665
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 380

PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 3:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Quote::
A Fackler Box is a framework to hold one gallon freezer bags filled with water - in my case salt-water. The concept is that you fire a bullet into the end of the box and it reacts as it impacts the bags in a way that is proportionally consistant with the bullets impact with soft tissue in game.

Testing the integrity and penetration in this way gives repeatable and consistant evaluation of a bullets capability on game when fired into the soft tissues of the vitals. When different bullets are fired into the same media the results can be compared in a manner that is representative of real life results.


I do the same thing and for the same reasons Paul S describes with a row of 1 gallon plastic jugs lined up on a wood plank set on two cider blocks. A round is fired into the front jug at whatever yardage and if all goes well the bullet is trapped inside one of the jugs further down the line....usually I would expect about 6 or 7 jugs to be penetrated with say a .270 win with 130 grain bullets at a practical upper end velocity......at 100 yards.

Seems to me with my experience at that it would take more than one 1 gallon bag to trap a bullet at 100 yards from a valid big game contender...but I dunno. I use regular un salted water.....does the added salt give that much more density to the liquid to stop a bullet inside one gallon..??

Just curious........
Back to top
View user's profile
rpakelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: May 01, 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 5:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Load Testing at What Distance? Reply with quote

Wildswalker, I think you misread his post. He has more than one , one gallon freezer bag. More like the number of one gallon milk jugs you use.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.