HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: deathloads
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13139

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 362
BOT: 1
Total: 363
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Home
03: Photo Albums
04: Statistics
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Home
12: Forums
13: Photo Albums
14: Forums
15: Photo Albums
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Home
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Home
29: Home
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Your Account
34: Privacy Policy
35: Home
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Home
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Forums
42: Reloading Database
43: Photo Albums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Forums
49: Home
50: Home
51: Home
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Home
56: Home
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Your Account
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Home
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Home
67: Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Forums
71: Home
72: Photo Albums
73: Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Photo Albums
77: Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Photo Albums
82: Forums
83: Home
84: Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Your Account
90: Photo Albums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Home
96: Home
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Home
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Home
105: Photo Albums
106: Home
107: Forums
108: Your Account
109: Home
110: Forums
111: Photo Albums
112: Photo Albums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Photo Albums
117: Home
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Home
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Home
125: Your Account
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Your Account
131: Home
132: Home
133: Forums
134: Home
135: Photo Albums
136: Home
137: Forums
138: Home
139: Your Account
140: Forums
141: Photo Albums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Your Account
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Photo Albums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Forums
155: Home
156: Forums
157: Home
158: Home
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Home
163: Your Account
164: Home
165: Forums
166: Home
167: Forums
168: Home
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Home
174: Forums
175: Photo Albums
176: Photo Albums
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Photo Albums
180: Photo Albums
181: Photo Albums
182: Forums
183: Home
184: Home
185: Photo Albums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Home
191: Photo Albums
192: Forums
193: Home
194: Forums
195: Home
196: Forums
197: Home
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Photo Albums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Home
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Home
210: Your Account
211: Home
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Home
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Your Account
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Home
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Home
224: Photo Albums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Photo Albums
228: Home
229: Home
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Home
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Home
237: Home
238: Forums
239: Photo Albums
240: Home
241: Forums
242: Home
243: Forums
244: Photo Albums
245: Home
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Home
249: Home
250: Photo Albums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Your Account
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Home
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Home
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Home
266: Home
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Home
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: News
277: Forums
278: Photo Albums
279: Forums
280: Photo Albums
281: Photo Albums
282: Forums
283: Photo Albums
284: Photo Albums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Reloading Database
289: Forums
290: Home
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Photo Albums
296: Home
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Forums
300: Home
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Home
305: Your Account
306: Forums
307: Home
308: Forums
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Home
313: Forums
314: News
315: Forums
316: Home
317: Home
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Home
321: Forums
322: Home
323: Forums
324: Forums
325: Home
326: Forums
327: Home
328: Photo Albums
329: Forums
330: Home
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Home
335: Photo Albums
336: Home
337: Forums
338: Forums
339: Home
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Your Account
346: Forums
347: Photo Albums
348: Home
349: Forums
350: Home
351: Home
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Home
360: Forums
361: Your Account
362: Home
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2458
  · Views: 824942
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use?
Discussion that doesnt fit other Topics
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5009
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:47 am    Post subject: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Another forum I visit is having a discussion on using/prefering FMJs for defensive carry use. Its been interesting to see what and why people prefer one or the other. Honestly I was surprised at the number of folks who prefer FMJs, and their reasoning. So I thought I'd bring the subject here and see what happens.

Personally I've been studying the physics of shooting for 40+ years. There were a couple of periods when I was armed on the job so I had a pretty selfish reason to make sure that I knew what might work and what might not. During this time bullet construction, as well as available cartridges and guns, have changed. I expect to keep studying, and learning about it, for a while longer. I recently read "Combat Shooting" by Ayoob, which has a section on choices for defensive ammo. By the way, he and the experts he cites recommend JHPs.

First I'll say that if someone thinks that physics doesn't matter they obviously have no understanding of how the real world works. Second, EVERY shooting, regarding terminal ballistics, is different because there are so many variables, most importantly the "target's" physical and mental states. There is no way to predict with 100% certainty what will happen in a given situation. That doesn’t mean that tests are invalid.

That said, all of the different tests done over the years do point to certain things that tend to give better terminal results. Based on all that I will always carry a good JHP for defensive use. I do make an exception, if I was worried about very large critters I'd carry a good, heavy, flat pointed bullet. If a particular gun wouldn't feed JHPs reliably I'd either fix it, sell it or just use it for plinking.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
TRBLSHTR
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 23, 2007
Posts: 1071
Location: Lower 48's-left coast(near portlandia)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:18 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
Another forum I visit is having a discussion on using/prefering FMJs for defensive carry use. Its been interesting to see what and why people prefer one or the other. Honestly I was surprised at the number of folks who prefer FMJs, and their reasoning. So I thought I'd bring the subject here and see what happens.

Personally I've been studying the physics of shooting for 40+ years. There were a couple of periods when I was armed on the job so I had a pretty selfish reason to make sure that I knew what might work and what might not. During this time bullet construction, as well as available cartridges and guns, have changed. I expect to keep studying, and learning about it, for a while longer. I recently read "Combat Shooting" by Ayoob, which has a section on choices for defensive ammo. By the way, he and the experts he cites recommend JHPs.

First I'll say that if someone thinks that physics doesn't matter they obviously have no understanding of how the real world works. Second, EVERY shooting, regarding terminal ballistics, is different because there are so many variables, most importantly the "target's" physical and mental states. There is no way to predict with 100% certainty what will happen in a given situation. That doesn’t mean that tests are invalid.

That said, all of the different tests done over the years do point to certain things that tend to give better terminal results. Based on all that I will always carry a good JHP for defensive use. I do make an exception, if I was worried about very large critters I'd carry a good, heavy, flat pointed bullet. If a particular gun wouldn't feed JHPs reliably I'd either fix it, sell it or just use it for plinking.

Laughing DITTO!

_________________
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." Thomas Mann
Back to top
View user's profile
dhc4ever
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 26, 2011
Posts: 2944
Location: Ipswich, Queensland Australia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:23 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Defensive use against humans?
IMO JHP all the way.
More expended energy into the target, large wound channel, more shock and damage, less likely to have a projectile exit the target.

Defensive use against cape buffalo, something beginning with .5 and a solid bullet construction.

_________________
Pete

Dont do anything you wont like explaining to the paramedics..............
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:36 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
Based on all that I will always carry a good JHP for defensive use.

+1

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6405
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:02 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Ozzians never need to defend themselves.
not with guns, knives, 4by2's or any other physical stuff..
We simply sick the greenies to the baddies..

Well id that didnt work, I guess JHP might..

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Donut Slayer
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Pensacola, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 6:22 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Very interesting subject PS. I've been involved with several shootings in my career, more than I care to have. I perfer JHP to FMJ, BUT I can tell you in a lot of instances, JHP's will act like FMJ. IE, no expansion what so ever. We, (my dept) tested a variety of bullets when we swotched to 40'a a few years back. We have changed rounds several times too. We started with Black Talons, then the name changed to Supreme Xpansive Talons, then we changed to Speer Gold Dots, Then to Remington Goldern sabre's. The Talons were the most lethal on people. Gold dots had the most penetration. I know for a fact ( dont ask) they will go thru: bedroom door, 2 layers of sheet rock, 5 heavy jackets of leather, and denum, thru another 2 layers of sheetrock, and then hit the wall on the otherside of the living room, with NO expansion. HP was filled with sheetrock making it a FMJ.

_________________
Browning X-Bolt in 30'06. The work for a pet load starts again. Wink The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5009
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:20 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

DS, the subject of JHPs not expanding came up in the other forum too. My feeling there is that a hollow point MIGHT not expand, therefore acting like an FMJ, but an FMJ WILL not expand. IMO that's still a plus for the JHP.

A buddy of mine was involved in a lot of testing of ammo for a Federal agency a few years ago so I'll have to ask him what kind of results they got. It was all .40 S&W but I can't remember for sure what worked best for them.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Donut Slayer
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Pensacola, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:27 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

PS, I'm a JHP fan. Only thing I reccommend a FMJ in is a 25acp. Smile
BTW, in my 380 "get off me" gun, I carry hornady critical defence, the ones with the red polimer in the HP. They seem to always expand, but I havent shot anybody with it yet.

_________________
Browning X-Bolt in 30'06. The work for a pet load starts again. Wink The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Suzanne
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Posts: 3323
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:50 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

I particularly chose JHP for my 380 only because it seemed like the right thing to do. Not much of a pistol shooter myself but it just seems logical to me to choose an expanding boolit at close quarters. You don't want to just poke holes in someone, you want to dis-able them now. It's like the difference between using a long bladed knife or a hammer blow to the chest. You really have to mess up the insides bad to stop someone very fast. Poking holes is only going to make them bleed to death (slowly) but a nice wound channel or shock wave from a bullet that has expanded is going to at least make them stagger and know they were hit by something. The shock and distruction will take it's toll quicker than poking a hole will.

Queezzzyyy now
Suz

_________________
May the moon keep you centered,
May the sun keep you dancing,
And the stars shed light on your dreams.
Back to top
View user's profile
TRBLSHTR
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 23, 2007
Posts: 1071
Location: Lower 48's-left coast(near portlandia)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:36 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Confused On that subject of JHP's-I started using glaser safety slugs back when they came out in the( ?80's)only for the first mag or cylinder full,after that it's the std hollow points or the new ones with the "plastic"ball in the end.I used to make my own cast "dum-dums"and they really worked a charm on "things"-but the deputies and the lawyers decided that they were too effective and that I might get sued for not shooting politically correct ammo! Sad It's okay to kill a bad guy-Just don't do it too effectively! :(oop's did I say killed-I meant to say................................................stopped. Razz

_________________
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." Thomas Mann
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 4330
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:12 pm    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Most of the "defensive" ammo and components include a lightweight hp bullet. The "norm" for my 357 is a 125 grain JHP but since I use the same round for everything (accuracy is most important) I opted for the 140 JHP bullet in my loads. They may not be as fast as some of the commercial ammo but I can keep them grouped and shoot them instinctively very accurately too.

A shot to the head or neck with any caliber will stop an attacker quick. Even the puny 22RF will penetrate the skull at close range. The neck is not my favorite place to aim because the odds of actually hitting the spinal cord or even close enough to it to cause damage are arguably pretty low. My defensive shooting has always been to the middle of mass - until recently.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9276
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:57 am    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

I dont know alot about handgun rounds but from what I have read and from my own experience with rifle rounds on game over the years has led me to loose faith in a strict hollow point in favour of a nice juicy big exposed lead tip. the theory goes that a hollow may only open if the cavity is filled upon impact. I have 2 .223 52grn hollow points recovered from game that didnt open AT ALL and they have a great gaping hollow point and yet I havent ever recovered a spitzer or round nose that hadnt opened up. the norinco fmj .223 rounds tumble on impact and leave a huge wound cavity usually but that is different to a handgun round I believe. maybe the old guys with thier soft lead slugs had a good thing going??

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Aloysius
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 2447
Location: B., Belgium

PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:36 am    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Elvis, I wouldn't compare a .224 HP matchbullet with a HP of a handgunbullet...
but I'm surprised nobody is mentioning the lead bullet. In my opinion at handgunspeeds, it's hard to beat a lead bullet when it comes to stopping energy. And here I realy don't need a lead HP, RN or FN will also perform as required.
Back to top
View user's profile
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6405
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:06 am    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

The Hydroshock or whatchamacallit thingy, have a center pole within the HP, I guess the idea is to use the center pole to direct the material that may plug the hollow point to the sides of the HP, and thus giving it higher chance of expanding even if the HP is plugged.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1005
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
My feeling there is that a hollow point MIGHT not expand, therefore acting like an FMJ, but an FMJ WILL not expand. IMO that's still a plus for the JHP.

My opinion too. An FMJ is more likely to poke through a target to endanger persons or property. A hollow point that works properly helps minimize this as well as cause more damage at the target. Not entirely trusting any bullet's ability to expand is why I carry .45s with hollow point bullets. If they work, fine if not I have mass and diameter on my side in the event of bullet failure. Nothing wrong with a properly designed SWC either. It will at least cut a full-caliber hole and most penetrate straight.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.