View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MacD Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011 Posts: 1052 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:55 pm Post subject: Wasted Powder?? |
|
Got in some range time after work. Got time to try two laddered loads but they chrono'd at almost the same avg speed. 3053 vs 3063. First was 26.2 Varget and the second 26.5 which is still below maximum for the 60 grain Hornady HP bullet I used. Is it possible that the additional powder was just blown out the muzzle? I am going to repeat the comparison and then also do it with CCI SRM primers to see if the hotter primer makes a difference. Any other ideas? BTW I measured each charge individually so I know I added the extra 0.3 grains of powder to the second batch of 5 cartridges.
_________________ La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Elvis Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008 Posts: 9359 Location: south island New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:40 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
you did get a 10fps increase!!!!
maybe it just doesnt want to go any faster the primer change may be the ticket. I can see a few trips to the range in the near future coming up for you.we are talking .223 arent we??? this is about right by my manual the 62 grn with 25 grns behind would be at that speed.
_________________ You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MacD Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011 Posts: 1052 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:21 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
Yes 223. Should have mentioned that. I need a whole day on the range. I had planned it today because of absolutely no wind but alas had to work for 5 hours instead. Another 6 months and retired "Gentleman"?
_________________ La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slimjim Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009 Posts: 8317 Location: Fort Worth TX
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
were these 3 shot groups? If so, not large enough to be stastically significant. I would doubt you have unburned powder. Run a cleaning patch down and see if any grains of powder come out. I had this happen to me with Varget with a light loaded .45-70 but not a .223. With .223, I use .3gr powder increments to ball-park a load and determine where I should use .1gr increments to find the real sweet spot.
_________________ "To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt
"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SyberShooter Member


Joined: Jul 23, 2010 Posts: 93 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:10 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
You don't say what barrel length 20"? 16? 11"?
I have some chrono data for 77gr & varget but not 60gr yet
24.0 is running about 2530 out a 16" tube
24.5 is giving 2570 avg but with a 75gr bullet
so yeah, 10fps is not much and within SD for any given load.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
44marty Super Member


Joined: Mar 20, 2009 Posts: 775 Location: Cheshire, MA; USA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:04 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
My first thought was also to try magnum primers. then I started thinking more. First, I would think at least 10 rounds of each would give you a better idea of velocities. Second, .3 grains is not a very large difference (only about 1%)
Try subtracting the min load from the max and dividing by 5 for an increment. That looks like .6 gr for varget with a 60 gr bullet in the .223
_________________ _____________________________________
The strength of the wolf is in the pack; the strength of the pack is in the wolf. ~ R. Kipling
I LOVE YOU, LADY LUCK !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SingleShotLover Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007 Posts: 1006 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:39 am Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
44marty wrote: |
First, I would think at least 10 rounds of each would give you a better idea of velocities. Second, .3 grains is not a very large difference (only about 1%) |
Marty is right. Chronographing loads using a higher number of rounds per run will give a better baseline of actual velocity figures for each load. 3 rounds doesn't give enough data to address anomalies.
Faster burning powders such as BLC2 or H322 might show significant increases with .3 grains of powder, but the burning rate of Varget falls roughly in the "medium" burning rate range and .3 grains really doesn't mean much.
Your caution is to be commended, however. Too many loaders just jump right into maximum loads without doing their due diligence and create potentially dangerous conditions for themselves and others.
_________________ If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!
The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.
SSL |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SyberShooter Member


Joined: Jul 23, 2010 Posts: 93 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:47 am Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
what he said... x1
I'm a little confused as to how you ran your tests. At first I thought you ran 2 shot strings of 5 different loads and was asking about 2 specifics of the 5 shot string. This is how I would have run the ladder to find sweet spots. But after re-reading your post, it looks like you had a different approach. A little more info would be helpful ...
You mention you have 2 shot strings and 5 rounds each (If I am reading your 1st post right).
Are these 5 each a different load or 5 of the same load. This would make a difference if your using 1 shot or 5 shots per load rung.
ie:2 ladders of 5 rungs or a partial ladder of 2 rungs of 5 shots each.
By the floowup posts and data given so far, I'm now assuming all 5 are the same charge, and your reported velocities must be averages of the 5 shots each. If this is the case then 10 fps is too small a variance between them and something else is wrong. Put a new battery in the chrono and try again. I've had this happen recently.
sorry for my confusion.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
44marty Super Member


Joined: Mar 20, 2009 Posts: 775 Location: Cheshire, MA; USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:31 am Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
SyberShooter wrote: |
what he said... x1
Put a new battery in the chrono and try again. I've had this happen recently.
|
Good point. Most often when I have had unexpected chrono results, it is due to something with the chronograph rather than the loads. Even a change in the amount of cloud cover can make a difference.
_________________ _____________________________________
The strength of the wolf is in the pack; the strength of the pack is in the wolf. ~ R. Kipling
I LOVE YOU, LADY LUCK !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chambered221 Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 3455 Location: Lost for good !!!
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
I doubt you were just blowing powder down the barrel !!!
I would have expected at least a 25fps increase.
I'm assuming you are referring to trying a CCI mag primer....... Personally I don't think that's the way to go.
However if your using a standard or match CCI primer I could see where a hotter primer might help.
_________________ Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Last edited by chambered221 on Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:23 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MacD Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011 Posts: 1052 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:02 pm Post subject: Re: Wasted Powder?? |
|
In no particular order:
- Both loads are compressed
- Bore was really dirty but no grains of powder that I could see.
- I fired 5 at the lower load and then 5 at the higher. Each shot was chrono'd and the average of each 5 shot string taken.
- Average group for the lower load with one that I pulledremoved = 0.32 and upper = 0.31 @50 meters/yards.
- When I repeat I will ensure new battery in chrono and post results. I am anxious to start adjusting seating after I get this settled. One of these is my best load with this component combination.
BTW I well along my initial work-up for RE10X. I started at 19-0 grns and am up to 22.5 and all groups are averaging under 1 inch at 50. The best is 21.5 at less than 0.5 inches.
_________________ La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|