HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: hostdocket_
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13138

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 285
BOT: 1
Total: 286
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Photo Albums
03: Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Photo Albums
26: Forums
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Photo Albums
35: Your Account
36: Forums
37: Home
38: Forums
39: Home
40: Home
41: Your Account
42: Home
43: Photo Albums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Forums
49: Home
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Statistics
55: Home
56: Home
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Home
61: Home
62: Forums
63: Photo Albums
64: Forums
65: Home
66: Home
67: Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Home
75: Forums
76: Home
77: Photo Albums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Statistics
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Home
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Home
103: Home
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Home
107: Home
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Photo Albums
115: Forums
116: Home
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Home
121: Photo Albums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Home
127: Your Account
128: Statistics
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Home
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Your Account
138: Your Account
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Home
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Forums
149: News
150: Home
151: Forums
152: Home
153: Forums
154: Home
155: Home
156: Photo Albums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Home
160: News
161: Forums
162: Your Account
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Photo Albums
167: Your Account
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Photo Albums
173: Home
174: Forums
175: Home
176: Photo Albums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Home
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Photo Albums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Home
189: Home
190: Your Account
191: Photo Albums
192: Forums
193: Home
194: Forums
195: Home
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Home
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Home
207: Photo Albums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Statistics
214: Forums
215: Home
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Albums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Home
223: Forums
224: Home
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Your Account
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Photo Albums
232: Home
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Home
236: Forums
237: Home
238: Forums
239: Home
240: Home
241: Your Account
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Home
245: Forums
246: Photo Albums
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Home
251: Home
252: Photo Albums
253: Home
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Home
259: Photo Albums
260: Home
261: Home
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Home
266: News
267: Photo Albums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Home
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Home
279: Photo Albums
280: Home
281: Home
282: Forums
283: Home
284: Forums
285: Forums
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2458
  · Views: 824942
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

.270 Win or .308 Win
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:18 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

lilbudsjst, You still with us??? You getting anything figured out???
You better jump back in a get us headed in the right direction before someone starts talking 338!!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:44 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

Back this weekend from an elk hunt with my grandson, his second in three years. We tracked a nice 6X6 for the better part of the morning and finally got sight of him. The grandson estimated the distance at slightly over 200 yards, took a good shooting position, rested, and fired. The bullet entered the right front shoulder, the bull ran 20 paces or so and dropped. Three bulls have been taken with a .243 Win, using 100gr Nosler partitions by two of my grandsons. One shot kills.

OK, the .243 isn't the ideal elk cartridge, but, it has worked without wounding in the hands of a shooter that practices regularly and has the patience to wait for the right shot.

270 vs 308 may be less critical than choosing the proper bullet. As we know there are bullets with thin jackets and those with thick jackets. There are monolithic bullets (TSX, eBullet), partitions bullets, et al. To kill, a bullet must be capable of penetrating hide and bone and get to the vital organ(s). With either cartridge a properly constucted bullet that is properly placed will be affective.

In guiding elk hunters for eight years and having personally killed 19 big bulls over the decades, I have seldom seen killing shots over 100 yards. That some hunters buy into the idea that they can kill a bull elk reliably at extended ranges by means of the equipment alone is appalling and, candidly, repugnant. Hunting is about making sure killing shots and those that can do that will be able to do it with any number of cartridges and appropriate bullets.

308 vs 270? You gotta be kidding.


Last edited by Handloader on Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
stovepipe
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 4877
Location: Pine, Az.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:26 am    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

Handloader wrote:

With either cartridge a properly constucted bullet that is properly placed will be affective.
Hunting is about making sure, killing shots and those that can do that will be able to do it with any number of cartridges and appropriate bullets.

Cool
Back to top
View user's profile
lilbudsjst
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Sep 11, 2009
Posts: 6
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:11 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

I guess I should re-ask the question...I appreciate everyone's comments, but some seem to be going in a different direction.

I will be hanloading to get the optimum performance to match the rifle and want someone that has or had both of these calibers and handloaded for them also to recommend which caliber would be best to buy in a new rifle.

I have seen a .308 put a mulie down at approximately 170 yards and it seems to do the job just as well as the .270. The only really big difference I have found is bullet diameter between the two.

The largest game I will use it on is Elk and those shots will be less than 100 yards, but for the mulies it could be up to 200 yards. I don't plan on having to use anything over 165 grns if it is the .308 and I used to use 130 for my .270. Thanks again for everyones help.

_________________
"No Free Man Shall Ever Be Denied The Use Of Arms..."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:34 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

I think you are just going to have to choose because there really is no wrong answer. I hand load both. The .308 is more efficient on powder and there are more bullets and loads for the .308 because so many shoot it and its legacy as a military/match cartridge. But you only need one good load so having more is really not an advantage. I have more than enough loads to work with on my .270 to keep me busy and challenged. Me, I have come to like my 270 more but again, part of that is due to the rifle that shoots it. I also want to shoot farther than you do and the 270 has the advantage in that domain, IMO. You can make either cartridge work for you. If I was hunting elk at the ranges you are talking about, I'd use a 140 - 150 in the .270 and a 180 in the .308 unless your using an all copper bullet like the Barnes 130 gr TSX for the .270 or the 165 gr TTSX or TSX for the .308. These are only my opinions. Yours is the one that counts.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:32 am    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

I’m unable to give any opinion of direct experience as to what you’re asking; but IMHO either caliber is more than suffice with a 200 yard max!!!
Bullet selection is probably the more critical factor that should be looked upon.

With that said looking at this from a terminal ballistics view point I would give the nod to the .308 due to the larger permanent cavity that will be created with the larger diameter bullet.
When talking wound channels most ballistic experts agree bigger is better.
Short range cartridges such as the 338 Federal, 358 Winchester and the 35 Whelen are good examples of cartridges that were designed with this premise in mind.
You want quick clean kills......put the biggest diameter bullet you can through the heart or lungs of anything and their going down. The problem with the big stuff is too many guys get caught up in the velocity wars and never look at their impact velocity.
Ballistic experts also agree that any projectile regardless of its mass needs to be capable of delivering it’s forces upon the intended target. Magnum velocities at short range can leave you with a less than desirable outcome, this much you’ve obviously figured out and I commend you for it.
Good luck with whatever you decide!!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JASmith
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Sep 14, 2009
Posts: 9
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:53 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
I think you are just going to have to choose because there really is no wrong answer. I hand load both. The .308 is more efficient on powder and there are more bullets and loads for the .308 because so many shoot it and its legacy as a military/match cartridge. But you only need one good load so having more is really not an advantage. I have more than enough loads to work with on my .270 to keep me busy and challenged. Me, I have come to like my 270 more but again, part of that is due to the rifle that shoots it. I also want to shoot farther than you do and the 270 has the advantage in that domain, IMO. You can make either cartridge work for you. If I was hunting elk at the ranges you are talking about, I'd use a 140 - 150 in the .270 and a 180 in the .308 unless your using an all copper bullet like the Barnes 130 gr TSX for the .270 or the 165 gr TTSX or TSX for the .308. These are only my opinions. Yours is the one that counts.

Right on! The effectiveness, given a hit, is indistinguishable between these two cartridges. That takes us to your ability and patience in making the shot count. In this area, it is your comfort with the rifle and cartridge combination that counts. I use a BLR in the .270 and a sporterized 1903 in 30-06. I really like the .270 as a cartridge but am starting to move in the direction of the '03 only because the BLR has an atrocious trigger pull.

_________________
Nevermore...
shootersnotes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
lilbudsjst
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Sep 11, 2009
Posts: 6
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:53 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

I want to thank everyone for their advice and help. I have decided to get a .308 to go with my .270 and try it out. It sounds like it will be a lot of fun to shoot and hunt with.

Does anyone have some really good hunting loads I can load and start trying? I am sure there will be many to try for the best results and will take a while to find what works best with the new rifle.

_________________
"No Free Man Shall Ever Be Denied The Use Of Arms..."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile
shrpshtrjoe
Super Red Neck Member
Super Red Neck Member


Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Posts: 2965
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:05 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

I think you will be happy with the .308. Loads vary from rifle to rifle but Varget is a very good powder for the .308. Let us no how ya make out.
Joe

_________________
"MOLON LABE"

P E T A
People Eating Tasty Animals
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:33 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

shrpshtrjoe wrote:
Varget is a very good powder for the .308.

I agree. Varget shoots well in my .308. You may need to pick your bullet first. I choose to hunt with Barnes TSX or TTSX. Th Barnes Loading Manual #4, available on-line or in stores, has more loads but this link will give you an idea of performance.

http://www.barnesbullets.com/images/308WinWeb.pdf

I also use the Hodgon website as a reference.

http://data.hodgdon.com/main_menu.asp
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

When I was loading .308’s for whitetails I used 150gr Sierra Game Kings with IMR4064 and H414 that shot a MOA or better with the nod going to the 4064.

That was until a friend suggested I try Winchester 748!!! I did and immediately switch to it!!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:08 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

and you thought the choice of .270 vs .308 was easy!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
fnuser
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Posts: 914
Location: S.W. Missouri, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:22 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

i use hornady 165's w Rl15 for a hunting load and 168Smk's for tgt work @ 43g's work great in lapua cases.

_________________
N.R.A. Endowment Member
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8316
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:33 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

fnuser wrote:
43g's work great in lapua cases.

Cases, I forgot to mention that the brass I use has been one of the most significant factors impacting accuracy in my rifles. I'm not claiming any one manufacturer's brass is better than another but different brands shoot to different points of aim, different group sizes, and a rifle may prefer one over another. My Tikka .270 likes Remington Brass and my Rem 700 .308 likes Federal. I found this out by accident when I couldn't figure out why my groups were inconsistent. Then I realized that I had mixed Remington and Winchester Brass in the .270 and Remington and Federal in the .308. I separated them and presto, no more fliers and the groups were consistent and repeatable. Now, if I find I can't make a load work with my primary brass for that rifle, then I try a different brass. As an example, I worked for a couple of months and still was unable to get any powder weight to shoot less than an MOA for this one bullet - .270 120 gr Barnes. Switched the brass last weekend and had two powder weights shooting 1/2 MOA with the same bullet (see below). In the Remington brass the point of impact was 3 inches lower and 3 times as wide. Now I have 3 bullet weights shooting 1/2 MOA with the primary brass and a fourth bullet/load with the alternative brass.

250 yards


Last edited by slimjim on Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:45 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Donut Slayer
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Pensacola, Florida

PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:39 pm    Post subject: Re: .270 Win or .308 Win Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
fnuser wrote:
43g's work great in lapua cases.

Cases, I forgot to mention that the brass I use has been one of the most significant factors impacting accuracy in my rifles. I'm not claiming any one manufacturer's brass is better than another but different brands shoot to different points of aim, different group sizes, and a rifle may prefer one over another. My Tikka .270 likes Remington Brass and my Rem 700 .308 likes Federal. I found this out by accident when I couldn't figure out why my groups were inconsistent. Then I realized that I had mixed Remington and Winchester Brass in the .270 and Remington and Federal in the .308. I separated them and presto, no fliers and the groups were consistent and repeatable. Now, if I find I can't make a load work with my primary brass for that rifle then I try a different brass. As an example, I worked for a couple of months and still was unable to get any powder weight to shoot less than an MOA for this one bullet. Switched the brass last weekend and had two powder weights shooting 1/2 MOA with the same bullet. Now I have 3 bullet weights shooting 1/2 MOA with the primary brass and a fourth bullet/load with the alternative brass.
great post.

_________________
Browning X-Bolt in 30'06. The work for a pet load starts again. Wink The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 4 of 6
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.