HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 345
BOT: 1
Total: 346
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Home
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Your Account
10: Forums
11: Home
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Your Account
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Your Account
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Photo Albums
26: Forums
27: Home
28: Your Account
29: Home
30: Forums
31: Your Account
32: Your Account
33: Your Account
34: Your Account
35: Home
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Home
45: News
46: Home
47: Forums
48: Your Account
49: Home
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Your Account
53: Forums
54: Your Account
55: Photo Albums
56: Your Account
57: Photo Albums
58: Photo Albums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Home
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Your Account
71: Photo Albums
72: Forums
73: Your Account
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Your Account
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Photo Albums
81: Your Account
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Home
86: Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Home
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Your Account
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Photo Albums
103: Photo Albums
104: Forums
105: Home
106: Your Account
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Home
111: Forums
112: Photo Albums
113: Photo Albums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Photo Albums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Your Account
125: Forums
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Home
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Your Account
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Your Account
144: Forums
145: Photo Albums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Home
149: Your Account
150: Home
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Your Account
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Home
161: Your Account
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Home
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Photo Albums
171: Your Account
172: Home
173: Your Account
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Your Account
177: Your Account
178: Forums
179: Home
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Photo Albums
186: Forums
187: Home
188: Your Account
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Your Account
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Home
198: Forums
199: Home
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Photo Albums
207: Your Account
208: Forums
209: Your Account
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Statistics
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Your Account
224: Forums
225: Photo Albums
226: Forums
227: Photo Albums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Home
234: Forums
235: Photo Albums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Your Account
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Your Account
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Forums
255: Photo Albums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Home
259: Home
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Your Account
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Photo Albums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Photo Albums
270: Your Account
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Home
278: Forums
279: Home
280: Your Account
281: Forums
282: Home
283: Forums
284: Your Account
285: Forums
286: Forums
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Photo Albums
291: Photo Albums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Your Account
295: Forums
296: Photo Albums
297: Home
298: Photo Albums
299: Forums
300: Photo Albums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Photo Albums
304: Your Account
305: Your Account
306: Forums
307: Statistics
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Forums
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Photo Albums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Home
320: Your Account
321: Forums
322: Forums
323: Home
324: Photo Albums
325: Home
326: Forums
327: Your Account
328: Home
329: Forums
330: Your Account
331: Forums
332: Photo Albums
333: Forums
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Statistics
337: Home
338: Your Account
339: Photo Albums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
  BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820723
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Short Range Load Development
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:47 pm    Post subject: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

Apologies in advance for typos...I'm posting from my phone.

I can safely shoot 50 yds at home. Has anyone tried developing loads @ a shorter range with the intent to eventually stretch said loads too 100, 200, and 300 yds?

I guess the real question should be...can I gather enough data shooting @ 50 yds to determine whether a given load is worth loading and shootinv @ longer ranges?

Thank you in advance for any insight.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

well if I can get into 50 yards of an animal I will take shots that I wouldnt from further back...yes the data is relevant. a lot of guys sight in hunting rifle at 25 yards as this is GENERALLY very close to where bullet will first cross line of sight and if its approx 3000fps and 1 1/2" between scope and bore it SHOULD be close to 3"high at 100. so yes very relevant.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Vince
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 15701
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 4:44 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

Elevation isn't a problem, it's easy enough to sight your rifle in at whatever height above the target centre you like. Where things start to get a bit out of whack is with windage.

If you have a smallish windage problem it won't necessarily show at 50 yards, but it can be quite some way off at 100 yards. Only way I can see to check for this problem is by having another target back a ways behind your first target. a witness target if you like, for confirmation of fall of shot. If you have a windage problem it should become evident on the second target. Of course this may mean moving your first target a little closer than 50 yards, but the Trajectory Data on PB should tell you exactly where you need to be.

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8314
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 5:48 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

I sight some of my AR at 25 to 50 yards as that puts them on at 200 yards depending on the bullet. I often will shoot a grouping at 50 yards just to make sure my left-right is correct, especially on a windy day. You will still be able to see how well you groups are during load development just the groups are half the size that they are at 100 yards. I wish I had a personal 50 yards firing range.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 8:26 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

I normally sight at 20 yards and then go to 50, 100 and then 200. I like to think this allows me to start with coarse corrections at 20 and then progressively finer adjustments at the longer ranges. For example, an aproximately half inch correction on a 1/4" scope at 20 yards requires 10 clicks, versus 4 at 50, 2 at 100 and 1 at 200. Another way to look at this is that one click at 20 yards will only move POI about .05 ".

Vince mentioned windage issues and I agree. The other problem is rifle scope cant which only is noticed at longer ranges. If your rifle scope is canted then dialing up windage for longer ranges causes your POI to stray left or right depending on the direction of the cant. The worse the cant the greater the effect. Cant can most easily be seen at shorter ranges by levelling a target with a pronounced cross and then, with the rifle held plumb in a rest, standing back and looking through the scope and comparing the crosshairs to the cross on the target.. A better method is with a scope levelling device but the visual method is pretty accurate. Once the scope is adjusted, take aim and any cant caused by holding technique shows up as misalignment with the target.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 9:17 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

The distance to your target during load development is somewhat irrelevant on hunting loads out to about 300 yards !!!

Three points that you need to keep in mind during your assessment of the data.
As slim alluded to, group size will be cut in half. A 1 inch group will show up as a 1/2 inch group. A 1/2 inch group will show as a 1/4 inch group. So as you could imagine the initial thoughts may not represent the true standards by which most people judge by.
Secondly, Once you find the harmonic node the barrel likes, it will be harder to hone in on the the specific charge weight that falls in the center.(because of the tighter groups)
The last point point deals with bench technique and shooters ability. It's just easier to shoot good groups at shorter ranges. Be realistic about what you see. Once you find what you think works confirm it at longer distances.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
wiersy111
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 13, 2009
Posts: 2376
Location: Central Minnesota

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 10:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

I always start out at 25 or 50 yards. I usually find the smallest group possible at the shorter distance and then go to longer ranges to fine tune the loads. I usually get very good results by doing this.

_________________
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America " for an amount of "up to and including my life."

US ARMY RETIRED

The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.

Being "Over the Hill" is much better then being under it!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:46 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

hmm maybe I should re word that....sighting in at 25 is good way to CHECK that rifle is CLOSE to where it should be.
but as others have said the group size is 1/4 of what it should be at 100.
another very relevant point is you can easy see with naked eye the big ragged hole in target at 25..where as if you walk 200 to target to check,then 200 back if you are carting around a beer belly you will need a breather before being steady enough to continue shooting, also 25 yards of level ground with a good safe back stop is a heck of a lot easier to find than 200.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
wiersy111
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 13, 2009
Posts: 2376
Location: Central Minnesota

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:07 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis have you been watching me walk down range to check targets?

_________________
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America " for an amount of "up to and including my life."

US ARMY RETIRED

The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.

Being "Over the Hill" is much better then being under it!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

wtf Higher powered scopes and spotting scopes fix that problem.......no need for huff and puff !!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

If you are hunting big game a sighting test at 25 yards is a good way to check if a scope has been knocked out of adjustment. I find 50 is good for load development as holding on the exact same aiming point is easy and groups are easier to measure through the scope than at longer distances. At least to me anyways. The need to extend this out to longer ranges depends on your need for accuracy at those ranges. It also lets you create a bullet drop table for that specific load. That bullets have a predictable trajectory is, after all, the underlying tenat of programs like Point Blank. So my answer to the original question from HunterJoe is, IMHO! 50 is a pretty reliable distance for load development for longer ranges.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1065
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:43 am    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

If that is what you have it can be useful to weed out things that just don't work but you will still need to assess the performance at actual use distances.

IMHO - Doing a ladder or OCW test at less than 200 can be misleading. OCW really works best at 300.

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Short Range Load Development Reply with quote

Dawgdad wrote:
IMHO - Doing a ladder or OCW test at less than 200 can be misleading. OCW really works best at 300.

Never thought about it like that before but it does make sense !!!
The sweet spot will probably be a lot easier to identify.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.