HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: Dth17086
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 13137

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 345
BOT: 1
Total: 346
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Home
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Home
08: Forums
09: Home
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Forums
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Home
30: Forums
31: Your Account
32: Forums
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Forums
44: Photo Albums
45: Home
46: Home
47: Home
48: Forums
49: Photo Albums
50: News
51: Home
52: Home
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Photo Albums
57: Home
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Home
61: News
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Forums
66: Photo Albums
67: Home
68: Your Account
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Home
73: Forums
74: Home
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Photo Albums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Statistics
91: Home
92: Home
93: Forums
94: Your Account
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Home
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Home
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Home
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Home
119: Home
120: Home
121: Forums
122: Photo Albums
123: Forums
124: Home
125: Forums
126: Home
127: Forums
128: Home
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Home
137: Home
138: Forums
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Home
143: Forums
144: Photo Albums
145: News
146: Home
147: Your Account
148: Photo Albums
149: Forums
150: Home
151: Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Your Account
155: Home
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Photo Albums
160: Forums
161: Home
162: Your Account
163: Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Forums
168: News
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Forums
174: Home
175: Home
176: Home
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Home
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Home
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Your Account
186: Photo Albums
187: Home
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Home
194: Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Home
201: Home
202: Forums
203: Home
204: Home
205: Forums
206: Photo Albums
207: Home
208: Forums
209: Home
210: Photo Albums
211: Your Account
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Home
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Home
219: Home
220: Forums
221: Home
222: Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Your Account
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Home
234: Home
235: Forums
236: Home
237: Home
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Home
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Home
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Home
247: Home
248: Forums
249: Photo Albums
250: Forums
251: Photo Albums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Home
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Home
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Home
262: Home
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Home
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Home
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Home
277: Home
278: Forums
279: Home
280: Home
281: Forums
282: Home
283: Home
284: Home
285: Forums
286: Forums
287: Home
288: Photo Albums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Home
292: Forums
293: Home
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Photo Albums
300: Home
301: Forums
302: Home
303: Home
304: Home
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Your Account
309: Home
310: Home
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Home
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Photo Albums
321: Home
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Forums
325: Home
326: Home
327: Forums
328: Home
329: Your Account
330: Forums
331: Home
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Home
337: Forums
338: Photo Albums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Home
343: Home
344: Forums
345: Home
  BOT:
01: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2458
  · Views: 824942
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85
 

  The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

ShootingThe Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate
A chat room discussion got me looking hard at the “.308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield” debate. My contention was that there was no significant difference between the ballistics of the two in hunting situations, or for that matter in any other situation. So let’s examine the ballistics of both cartridges and compare.
First we’ll take a quick look at the history of both cartridges. The .30-06 Springfield started life as a US military cartridge in 1906. It was derived from the “.30 Model 1903” cartridge that was designed to replace the .30-40 Krag. The ’03 cartridge used the same 220 grain round nosed bullet as the .30-40. The ’06 is essentially the same case as the ’03 with a 150 grain spitzer bullet at 2800 ft/sec. The .30-06 was the primary cartridge for the US military until it was “replaced” by the .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO in 1954. The .308’s original load was a 149 grain spitzer at 2800 ft/sec. Both cartridges have certainly been very successful in military, match and hunting use! (Reference “Handloading” by William C. Davis, Jr.)

To quote the Speer #13 manual, “In the hunting field, ballistic differences between the 308 and the 30-06 are negligible.” The .308 was designed to duplicate the .30-06 for military use, but in a half inch shorter package. Both guns use the same 0.308” bullets. These bullets range from 100 grains to 250 grains in various styles. I figured that the .30-06 would have an advantage as the bullets get over 180 grains because its case was originally designed for the heavier bullets.
The most common hunting bullet weights for these cartridges are the 150, 165 and 180 grain. I realize that there are tons of loads for each cartridge but you’ve gotta start somewhere. I looked in the Speer #13 manual and compared their loads for both cartridges. I figure this is a pretty good comparison as loads for both cartridges were fired in the same type rifle, a Remington 700 with a 22” barrel. In each case I took the bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient and the highest velocity listed.

Here is a chart of the muzzle velocities for each bullet for both cartridges, the difference between them (.30-06 minus .308) and the percentage of that difference:
Bullet weight .308 .30-06 Difference %
150 2919 2847 -72 ft/sec -2.5
165 2812 2803 -9 ft/sec -0.3
180 2623 2756 133 ft/sec 4.8

From the chart we can see that the average difference in velocities for the three bullets is 17 ft/sec, or 0.6%, in favor of the .30-06. Now don’t forget that these are average velocities. In a string of shots a cartridge/gun’s velocity can easily have a standard deviation of 1% or more. In other words the normal variations in loads result in a built-in error that pretty much means we can’t count on such a small difference to be meaningful.

So, what does all this mean downrange? We’ll zero both guns at 200 yards and compare the bullet energy there. Let’s also take a look at what the bullets will be doing at 400 yards, which is a heck of a long shot for hunting. I used the “PointBlank” ballistics program to make the comparisons.

With the 150 grain bullet the .308 has 2093 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards while the .30-06 has 1985 foot-pounds. Out at 400 yards the .308 will have dropped 20.9 inches, and still has 1512 foot-pounds. The .30-06 will have dropped 22.13 inches and maintains 1428 foot-pounds. The .308 shows 5.9% more energy at 400 yards.

Then with the 165 grain bullet 200 yards the .308 shows 2202 foot-pounds versus 2187 foot-pounds for the .30-06. At 400 yards the .308 drops 21.90 inches and has 1645 foot-pounds. The .30-06 drops 22.06 inches with 1633 foot-pounds left. At 400 yards the .308 has a tiny 0.7% energy advantage.

Finally we take the 180 grain bullet, which should give the biggest advantage to the .30-06. At the 200 yard mark the .308 will have an energy of 2143 foot-pounds and the .30-06 will have 2379 foot-pounds. The .30-06 has about 11% more energy. When we get out to 400 yards the .308 will be 24.64 inches low and still have 1647 foot-pounds while the .30-06 will be 22.10 inches low and still carry 1840 foot-pounds. That means that at 400 yards the .30-06 has an 11.7% advantage in energy.

Now I’m sure that folks will look up their favorite of these two and “prove” that it is better in some manual or another. I looked in some other manuals too and found varying velocities. One thing I noticed in one manual was that, with 250 grain bullets (yes, that is two hundred and fifty grains), there was only 100 feet per sec difference in the velocities of the two cartridges. That particular manual doesn’t give any barrel lengths though.

Just for giggles I also looked at the .270 Winchester and .280 Remington loads in the same Speer manual. With a 22” barrel and a 150 grain bullet at 2907 feet per second the .270 has 2170 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1648 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 19.98 inches. The .280, with a 24” barrel and a 145 grain bullet at 2975 feet per second, shows 2209 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1689 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 18.83”. So, both of these cartridges “beat” the .30 caliber rounds in energy and trajectory.

When it’s all said and done does either the .308 or the .30-06 really have any ballistic advantage over the other? I’ll concede that an 11% difference in energy with the 180 grain bullet is an advantage but I wonder if a deer on the receiving end tell the difference between 1647 and 1840 foot-pounds of energy? Considering the overall differences and performance of both cartridges I’ll stick to my assertion that there is no SIGNIFICANT ballistic advantage with either cartridge. Now just pick which ever you like and enjoy shooting it!

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 (18:29:48) (37844 reads) [ Administration ]
Related Links
 More about Shooting

Most read story about Shooting:
BUILDING THE SWEDISH MAUSER SPORTER
 

Article Rating
Average Score: 4.63
Votes: 46


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 

 

Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.