HuntingNut » News » The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: IPutMoInYoA

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13131

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 239

BOT: 2

Total: 241

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Your Account
03: Photo Albums
04: Forums
05: Home
06: Forums
07: Your Account
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Your Account
11: Forums
12: Home
13: Your Account
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Photo Albums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Home
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Photo Albums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Home
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Home
38: Your Account
39: Home
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Your Account
44: Photo Albums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Home
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Photo Albums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Photo Albums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Home
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Home
65: Home
66: Forums
67: Home
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Home
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Home
86: Forums
87: Photo Albums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Home
91: Photo Albums
92: Home
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Home
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: News
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Home
107: Forums
108: Home
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: News
113: Photo Albums
114: Forums
115: Home
116: Forums
117: Home
118: Forums
119: Photo Albums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Home
123: Photo Albums
124: Photo Albums
125: Photo Albums
126: Forums
127: Your Account
128: Home
129: Home
130: Home
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Photo Albums
134: Forums
135: Your Account
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Photo Albums
140: Photo Albums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Home
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Photo Albums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Photo Albums
155: Forums
156: Home
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Home
162: Forums
163: Home
164: Forums
165: Your Account
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Photo Albums
174: Photo Albums
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Forums
179: Your Account
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Photo Albums
184: Forums
185: Your Account
186: Home
187: Forums
188: Photo Albums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Home
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Home
208: Home
209: Forums
210: Home
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Home
215: Forums
216: Home
217: Photo Albums
218: Home
219: Forums
220: Home
221: Forums
222: Home
223: Forums
224: Home
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Home
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Photo Albums
231: Forums
232: Home
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Your Account
238: Home
239: Home

BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824590
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate
A chat room discussion got me looking hard at the “.308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield” debate. My contention was that there was no significant difference between the ballistics of the two in hunting situations, or for that matter in any other situation. So let’s examine the ballistics of both cartridges and compare.
First we’ll take a quick look at the history of both cartridges. The .30-06 Springfield started life as a US military cartridge in 1906. It was derived from the “.30 Model 1903” cartridge that was designed to replace the .30-40 Krag. The ’03 cartridge used the same 220 grain round nosed bullet as the .30-40. The ’06 is essentially the same case as the ’03 with a 150 grain spitzer bullet at 2800 ft/sec. The .30-06 was the primary cartridge for the US military until it was “replaced” by the .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO in 1954. The .308’s original load was a 149 grain spitzer at 2800 ft/sec. Both cartridges have certainly been very successful in military, match and hunting use! (Reference “Handloading” by William C. Davis, Jr.)

To quote the Speer #13 manual, “In the hunting field, ballistic differences between the 308 and the 30-06 are negligible.” The .308 was designed to duplicate the .30-06 for military use, but in a half inch shorter package. Both guns use the same 0.308” bullets. These bullets range from 100 grains to 250 grains in various styles. I figured that the .30-06 would have an advantage as the bullets get over 180 grains because its case was originally designed for the heavier bullets.
The most common hunting bullet weights for these cartridges are the 150, 165 and 180 grain. I realize that there are tons of loads for each cartridge but you’ve gotta start somewhere. I looked in the Speer #13 manual and compared their loads for both cartridges. I figure this is a pretty good comparison as loads for both cartridges were fired in the same type rifle, a Remington 700 with a 22” barrel. In each case I took the bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient and the highest velocity listed.

Here is a chart of the muzzle velocities for each bullet for both cartridges, the difference between them (.30-06 minus .308) and the percentage of that difference:
Bullet weight .308 .30-06 Difference %
150 2919 2847 -72 ft/sec -2.5
165 2812 2803 -9 ft/sec -0.3
180 2623 2756 133 ft/sec 4.8

From the chart we can see that the average difference in velocities for the three bullets is 17 ft/sec, or 0.6%, in favor of the .30-06. Now don’t forget that these are average velocities. In a string of shots a cartridge/gun’s velocity can easily have a standard deviation of 1% or more. In other words the normal variations in loads result in a built-in error that pretty much means we can’t count on such a small difference to be meaningful.

So, what does all this mean downrange? We’ll zero both guns at 200 yards and compare the bullet energy there. Let’s also take a look at what the bullets will be doing at 400 yards, which is a heck of a long shot for hunting. I used the “PointBlank” ballistics program to make the comparisons.

With the 150 grain bullet the .308 has 2093 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards while the .30-06 has 1985 foot-pounds. Out at 400 yards the .308 will have dropped 20.9 inches, and still has 1512 foot-pounds. The .30-06 will have dropped 22.13 inches and maintains 1428 foot-pounds. The .308 shows 5.9% more energy at 400 yards.

Then with the 165 grain bullet 200 yards the .308 shows 2202 foot-pounds versus 2187 foot-pounds for the .30-06. At 400 yards the .308 drops 21.90 inches and has 1645 foot-pounds. The .30-06 drops 22.06 inches with 1633 foot-pounds left. At 400 yards the .308 has a tiny 0.7% energy advantage.

Finally we take the 180 grain bullet, which should give the biggest advantage to the .30-06. At the 200 yard mark the .308 will have an energy of 2143 foot-pounds and the .30-06 will have 2379 foot-pounds. The .30-06 has about 11% more energy. When we get out to 400 yards the .308 will be 24.64 inches low and still have 1647 foot-pounds while the .30-06 will be 22.10 inches low and still carry 1840 foot-pounds. That means that at 400 yards the .30-06 has an 11.7% advantage in energy.

Now I’m sure that folks will look up their favorite of these two and “prove” that it is better in some manual or another. I looked in some other manuals too and found varying velocities. One thing I noticed in one manual was that, with 250 grain bullets (yes, that is two hundred and fifty grains), there was only 100 feet per sec difference in the velocities of the two cartridges. That particular manual doesn’t give any barrel lengths though.

Just for giggles I also looked at the .270 Winchester and .280 Remington loads in the same Speer manual. With a 22” barrel and a 150 grain bullet at 2907 feet per second the .270 has 2170 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1648 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 19.98 inches. The .280, with a 24” barrel and a 145 grain bullet at 2975 feet per second, shows 2209 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1689 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 18.83”. So, both of these cartridges “beat” the .30 caliber rounds in energy and trajectory.

When it’s all said and done does either the .308 or the .30-06 really have any ballistic advantage over the other? I’ll concede that an 11% difference in energy with the 180 grain bullet is an advantage but I wonder if a deer on the receiving end tell the difference between 1647 and 1840 foot-pounds of energy? Considering the overall differences and performance of both cartridges I’ll stick to my assertion that there is no SIGNIFICANT ballistic advantage with either cartridge. Now just pick which ever you like and enjoy shooting it!

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 (18:29:48) (37487 reads) [ Administration ]