HuntingNut » News » The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: patrad69

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13133

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 414

BOT: 1

Total: 415

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Photo Albums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Home
46: Home
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Your Account
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Home
59: Forums
60: Home
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Your Account
70: Forums
71: Home
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: News
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Home
83: Forums
84: Home
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Home
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Home
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Your Account
128: Forums
129: Home
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Photo Albums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Home
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Your Account
147: Your Account
148: Home
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Photo Albums
158: Forums
159: Home
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Home
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Photo Albums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Home
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Home
189: Photo Albums
190: Forums
191: Home
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Home
195: Forums
196: Photo Albums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Home
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Home
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Photo Albums
225: Your Account
226: Photo Albums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Home
233: Forums
234: Photo Albums
235: Home
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Home
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Your Account
253: Forums
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Photo Albums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Photo Albums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Home
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Home
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Home
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Home
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Forums
292: Home
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Home
298: Home
299: Forums
300: Forums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Photo Albums
304: Home
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Home
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Forums
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Forums
315: Photo Albums
316: Home
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Forums
321: Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Forums
325: Forums
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Forums
329: Forums
330: Home
331: Photo Albums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Forums
337: Forums
338: Home
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Home
344: Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Forums
348: Forums
349: Home
350: Your Account
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Home
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Home
358: Forums
359: Home
360: Forums
361: Home
362: Forums
363: Forums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Forums
367: Forums
368: Home
369: Forums
370: Forums
371: Photo Albums
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: News
375: Home
376: Forums
377: Forums
378: Forums
379: Forums
380: Photo Albums
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Forums
384: Forums
385: Forums
386: Forums
387: Forums
388: Forums
389: Home
390: Forums
391: Forums
392: News
393: Forums
394: Home
395: Forums
396: Home
397: Home
398: Home
399: Home
400: Forums
401: Home
402: Forums
403: Forums
404: Home
405: Forums
406: News
407: Forums
408: Forums
409: Forums
410: Forums
411: Forums
412: Forums
413: Forums
414: Forums

BOT:
01: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2455
  · Views: 824588
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate
A chat room discussion got me looking hard at the “.308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield” debate. My contention was that there was no significant difference between the ballistics of the two in hunting situations, or for that matter in any other situation. So let’s examine the ballistics of both cartridges and compare.
First we’ll take a quick look at the history of both cartridges. The .30-06 Springfield started life as a US military cartridge in 1906. It was derived from the “.30 Model 1903” cartridge that was designed to replace the .30-40 Krag. The ’03 cartridge used the same 220 grain round nosed bullet as the .30-40. The ’06 is essentially the same case as the ’03 with a 150 grain spitzer bullet at 2800 ft/sec. The .30-06 was the primary cartridge for the US military until it was “replaced” by the .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO in 1954. The .308’s original load was a 149 grain spitzer at 2800 ft/sec. Both cartridges have certainly been very successful in military, match and hunting use! (Reference “Handloading” by William C. Davis, Jr.)

To quote the Speer #13 manual, “In the hunting field, ballistic differences between the 308 and the 30-06 are negligible.” The .308 was designed to duplicate the .30-06 for military use, but in a half inch shorter package. Both guns use the same 0.308” bullets. These bullets range from 100 grains to 250 grains in various styles. I figured that the .30-06 would have an advantage as the bullets get over 180 grains because its case was originally designed for the heavier bullets.
The most common hunting bullet weights for these cartridges are the 150, 165 and 180 grain. I realize that there are tons of loads for each cartridge but you’ve gotta start somewhere. I looked in the Speer #13 manual and compared their loads for both cartridges. I figure this is a pretty good comparison as loads for both cartridges were fired in the same type rifle, a Remington 700 with a 22” barrel. In each case I took the bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient and the highest velocity listed.

Here is a chart of the muzzle velocities for each bullet for both cartridges, the difference between them (.30-06 minus .308) and the percentage of that difference:
Bullet weight .308 .30-06 Difference %
150 2919 2847 -72 ft/sec -2.5
165 2812 2803 -9 ft/sec -0.3
180 2623 2756 133 ft/sec 4.8

From the chart we can see that the average difference in velocities for the three bullets is 17 ft/sec, or 0.6%, in favor of the .30-06. Now don’t forget that these are average velocities. In a string of shots a cartridge/gun’s velocity can easily have a standard deviation of 1% or more. In other words the normal variations in loads result in a built-in error that pretty much means we can’t count on such a small difference to be meaningful.

So, what does all this mean downrange? We’ll zero both guns at 200 yards and compare the bullet energy there. Let’s also take a look at what the bullets will be doing at 400 yards, which is a heck of a long shot for hunting. I used the “PointBlank” ballistics program to make the comparisons.

With the 150 grain bullet the .308 has 2093 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards while the .30-06 has 1985 foot-pounds. Out at 400 yards the .308 will have dropped 20.9 inches, and still has 1512 foot-pounds. The .30-06 will have dropped 22.13 inches and maintains 1428 foot-pounds. The .308 shows 5.9% more energy at 400 yards.

Then with the 165 grain bullet 200 yards the .308 shows 2202 foot-pounds versus 2187 foot-pounds for the .30-06. At 400 yards the .308 drops 21.90 inches and has 1645 foot-pounds. The .30-06 drops 22.06 inches with 1633 foot-pounds left. At 400 yards the .308 has a tiny 0.7% energy advantage.

Finally we take the 180 grain bullet, which should give the biggest advantage to the .30-06. At the 200 yard mark the .308 will have an energy of 2143 foot-pounds and the .30-06 will have 2379 foot-pounds. The .30-06 has about 11% more energy. When we get out to 400 yards the .308 will be 24.64 inches low and still have 1647 foot-pounds while the .30-06 will be 22.10 inches low and still carry 1840 foot-pounds. That means that at 400 yards the .30-06 has an 11.7% advantage in energy.

Now I’m sure that folks will look up their favorite of these two and “prove” that it is better in some manual or another. I looked in some other manuals too and found varying velocities. One thing I noticed in one manual was that, with 250 grain bullets (yes, that is two hundred and fifty grains), there was only 100 feet per sec difference in the velocities of the two cartridges. That particular manual doesn’t give any barrel lengths though.

Just for giggles I also looked at the .270 Winchester and .280 Remington loads in the same Speer manual. With a 22” barrel and a 150 grain bullet at 2907 feet per second the .270 has 2170 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1648 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 19.98 inches. The .280, with a 24” barrel and a 145 grain bullet at 2975 feet per second, shows 2209 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1689 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 18.83”. So, both of these cartridges “beat” the .30 caliber rounds in energy and trajectory.

When it’s all said and done does either the .308 or the .30-06 really have any ballistic advantage over the other? I’ll concede that an 11% difference in energy with the 180 grain bullet is an advantage but I wonder if a deer on the receiving end tell the difference between 1647 and 1840 foot-pounds of energy? Considering the overall differences and performance of both cartridges I’ll stick to my assertion that there is no SIGNIFICANT ballistic advantage with either cartridge. Now just pick which ever you like and enjoy shooting it!

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 (18:29:48) (37603 reads) [ Administration ]