HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: Sarvo
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12586

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 50
BOT: 3
Total: 53
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Your Account
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Your Account
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Photo Albums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Your Account
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Your Account
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2358
  · Views: 358003
  · Votes: 1306
  · Comments: 85
 

Support our Advertisers

Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
M-36
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Oct 25, 2010
Posts: 10
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:37 pm    Post subject: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

I have an older can (metal) of W760 ball powder. Is there a difference in the charge for newer powder that would be in a recent edition of the Hornady manual as opposed to an older version?

The reason Im asking is I loaded some .270's Hornady SP Interlock with the older powder and my charge of 50.5 and 52.5 from the manual with the listed COL seemed to crater the CCI 200 primer I was using. I started low with a charge of 48.6 and it didnt crater the primer.

Could a current load with older W760 be to hot?
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7471
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

I only have the newer W760 powder and haven't run into any pressure issues using Hodgdon data. Maybe some of the members have some older manuals and can check to see if the recommend loads are different. I developed some loads initially with some well aged Varget and its performance was completely different than the new Varget. I wouldn't expect the different time-frame powders to produce the same pressures. Did you take velocity data? It might give you some other clues that your pressure is high.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:32 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7394
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:16 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

what projectile wieght???

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
M-36
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Oct 25, 2010
Posts: 10
Location: Tucson, AZ

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:19 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

130 grn
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3508
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:20 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

The powder specs haven't changed but there is always the possibility of variations that will affect the maximum working charge.
In my experience with 760 I have had to reduce a charge up to 2 grains over the highest charge I had used to get the same accuracy out of it when changing to a new lot.

I guess that is why we are always warned to reduce charges and work back up when changing any component. A new lot of powder fits into that "new component" bag.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7394
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:20 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

150grn 49grns powder
130grn52grns powder
100grn56grnpowder
winchester 760 powder
from 1989 tenth edition winchester booklet.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4463
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:44 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

Seems that I've read the some companies reduced their recommended loads when they switched from the old copper/lead crusher measuring system to electronic systems because they found that the old loads were hotter than they thought. As Paul said, powder can vary some from lot to lot and "aging" might change things a little too.

Regardless of the publish loads, you need to watch the pressure signs in YOUR gun.

For a .270 Winchester:
My 1973 Hornady manual lists a MAX load of 57.0 grains of 760 for a 130 grain bullet.
My 2007 Hornady manual lists a MAX load of 54.4 grains of 760 for a 130 grain bullet.
The Hodgdon/Winchester website lists a MAX load of 53.5 grains of 760 for a 130 grain bullet.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7471
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

There is a trend there. Plus if your particular gun has a smaller chamber than average, pressure will be higher. My friends .270 has a smaller chamber than mine. His fired brass fits in my chamber without issue and his bolt closes hard on brass that is a couple thousandths below max case length.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3455
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
I developed some loads initially with some well aged Varget (yep, metal can) and its performance was completely different than the new Varget.

Varget never came in a metal can !!!



I agree with Paul but I also believe there is a better consistency today then what we had 20+ years ago.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7471
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

chambered221 wrote:
Varget never came in a metal can !!!

chambered, thanks for keeping me straight. A shooting buddy sold me a pound of Varget from his supply that he had had for quite some time. I shouldn't have assumed the can I brought home was the same as his original container.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
wncchester
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

"Is there a difference in the charge for newer powder that would be in a recent edition of the Hornady manual as opposed to an older version? "

It's a popular myth that "old" powders were different from "new' powders. That's silly; other than the normal and narrow lot to lot variations, cannister powders are not changed nor should they be. There is no rational reason to change the burn rate of an established powder and doing so would only open the maker up to some serious legal problems. Any maker that wants to market a "new" powder will market it as a new powder, not put out a new powder under an old lable!

The SAAMI pressures established under the copper crusher systems are unchanged. All that's changed is the way they express the pressure, CUP vs. PSI. The variations we see in new vs. old loading manuals reflects the differences in the test weapons (and powder lot numbers). Their guns vary as much as ours.
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3508
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:26 am    Post subject: Re: Old vs. New W760 Ball Powder Reply with quote

PSI and CUP do not use the same systems.
CUP uses a copper crusher that measures a range of pressure as an average over a specific level.
PSI is measured with a piezoelectric transducer. It measures the pressure at a very high "real time" rate that covers all the pressures from ignition to exhaust. It is a lot more accurate and has shown some of the older pressures were actually a lot higher than they should have been. Some calibers have experiences micro-fractures in the chambers of multiple weapons caused by over pressure but non destructive loads. Some of those chambers were found after a catastrophic failure from many years of that overpressure loadin.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.