HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: milleregan
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12553

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 87
BOT: 2
Total: 89
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: News
03: Your Account
04: News
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Home
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: News
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: News
24: Forums
25: News
26: Forums
27: News
28: Forums
29: News
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: News
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: News
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: News
43: Forums
44: News
45: Forums
46: News
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: News
51: Forums
52: News
53: Forums
54: News
55: News
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Home
59: News
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: News
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: News
66: Reloading Database
67: Forums
68: News
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: News
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: News
75: News
76: Statistics
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: News
81: News
82: Forums
83: News
84: News
85: News
86: Forums
87: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Your Account

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2353
  · Views: 331498
  · Votes: 1305
  · Comments: 85
 

Support our Advertisers

energy measure
Discussion that doesnt fit other Topics
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
longwalker
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 12, 2005
Posts: 201
Location: Bethel, AK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:55 pm    Post subject: energy measure Reply with quote

I just found this and thought it was interesting enough to share.

Rather than ft/lbs as an energy measure try this calculation. A Hunter named Taylor apparantly came up with it.

caliber of bullet times weight in grains times velocity in ft/sec. devided by 7000

.458 x 350 x 2500 / 7000= 57.25 458 win mag

.338x 200 x 2670 / 7000 = 25.78 338-06

.429 x 240 x 1350 / 7000= 19.85 44 magnum

.257 x 100 x 3250 / 7000 = 11.97 25-06

This was his calculation. I think it is more representative of what happens in real life.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3175
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:23 pm    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

There are arguments pro and con to Taylors formula. I think it works well for large game but falls short on small game. Regardless enough people thought it was useful to request it be added to PointBlank, which it was. Taylor tables are located in the Misc Functions part of PointBlank Software.


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Gil Martin
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 1647
Location: Schnecksville, PA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:52 am    Post subject: OK Reply with quote

I am a bit uncertain about how to apply Taylor's formula versus foot/pounds of energy. All the best...
Gil

_________________
Gil
Back to top
View user's profile
Blaine
Member
Member


Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: 260
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:57 pm    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

These numbers are still confusing to me. It's like In Jim Carmichael's "Book of the Rifle" wherein he talks about "momentum" and calculates it for various loads. It is good stuff for technicians to argue about, but for me, I like the old fashioned ft/lbs. It is something I can relate to and understand. And besides, as far as that buck is concerned, he can't calculate anyway Wink Wink Just put it where it should go and make it go as fast as you can. Laughing It'll get the job done.

All the best..............Blaine

_________________
Shoot straight and above all shoot SMART....and remember God is still in control !!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
GroovyJack
Member
Member


Joined: May 21, 2005
Posts: 577
Location: Bama

PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2005 6:56 pm    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

Well I like Taylor's system , ftlbs favors light bullet weight and velocity , is not a true indicator of anything .. Just BIG numbers to impress you .. Besides if we used the ftlbs progressively as it werks for deer and moose etc , by the time you get to Cape Buffs and Elephant , you'd need a piece of field artillery ..
Jack

_________________
My Goal In Life Is To Be As Good Of A Person As My Dog Already Thinks I Am
Back to top
View user's profile
grimel
Member
Member


Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2005 10:05 pm    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

Taylors numbers are SPECIFICALLY to be used on dangerous game in Africa. He (Taylor) came up with this formula based on SOLIDS used on elephants, rhinos, etc. The number is the relative ability of the round to literally KO the animal & give the shooter a chance to administer a fatal blow IF the first shot missed (but was close).

IOW, for med size game and/or expanding bullets it's worthless.

Don't believe me? Buy the man's book.

_________________
But.....ain't many troubles that a man caint fix
with seven hundred dollars and his thirty ought six.

Lindy Cooper Wisdom



Last edited by grimel on Mon May 23, 2005 8:44 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
GroovyJack
Member
Member


Joined: May 21, 2005
Posts: 577
Location: Bama

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2005 1:00 am    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

Good points grimel , my book says the same thing..
Jack

_________________
My Goal In Life Is To Be As Good Of A Person As My Dog Already Thinks I Am
Back to top
View user's profile
Flint54
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 09, 2005
Posts: 389
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: energy measure Reply with quote

Energy can be a very misleading term. As an example lets use a very commonrifle round vs a very common handgun round.

.308 Winchester 150gr PSP at 2750fps. SD = .225 ME = 2519ftlb

.44 Magnum 300gr WFN at 1175fps. SD = .232 ME = 919ftlb

Now lets set up the shot:

Heavy wooded area and you are on the ground due to it being mostly pines and a tree stand would limit your view. You have been going after a good buck in the area and have spotted him prior. You would estimate him at @ 280 lbs with total of 8 points. The rut is near and the deer have really packed on the weight and the temp is around the low to mid 20s so the coat is full also.

You spot your buck at 35 yards, you have a clear shot at him quartering away and your shot will hit him behind the diaphram and have to quarter thru him to hit any vitals.
If you don't take the shot in a few seconds he will be out of sight and you don't know if you will get another chance.

I will tell you this, both will kill the deer. I would venture to say that the .308 will make a mess and more than likely will not exit the deer. The deer will travel 50 yards plus and not leave much of a trail. When you do find him the lung will be demolished and the heart will have some damage also if you did your part you will probably find the remains of your bullet here. The tracking will be very difficult and you need to look very hard for your deer.

If you are using the .44 Mag, it will punch through the deer and do some major damage to the lung, it will pass through the heart/or aortic area tearing up vessels/arteries and will exit the chest never to be found. Your deer will possibly travel a couple steps to maybe 50 yards maximum and will leave a blood trail that will look like the Yellow Brick Road.

The reason that I stated this is that bullets do funny things, SD to me is a better measure of a bullets possible performance along with its construction and makeup. That same 150gr bullet if it was a Nosler Partition would do ablut the same as the .44 bullet by exiting as would a Barnes XBT and some other Premium Bullets. One thing about the .44 is that it hits the target at a diameter that the rifle bullet has to expand to, The WFNs entry hole will be @ .400 diameter and look like a cookie cutter went in and the path of damage will be @ 3 - 4" in diameter all the way through the lung with an exit @1".

This is why I don't rely on energy formulas, the above situation happened to me so I can tell you both deer were recovered, the one hit with the .308 went just under 75 yards and piled up behind a fallen tree, the one hit with the .44 went 2 steps and fell over dead.

Pay attention to the construction of your bullet and the placement of your shot, also the larger the animal, heavier the hide & bones go to a higher SD on your bullet, look at the performance of the 6.5 X 55 Mauser. The 140gr will normally out penetrate any 150 - 165gr .308 bullet out there. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.