Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Latest: snapay
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12761

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 243
BOT: 2
Total: 245
Who Is Where:
01: Forums
02: Home
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Your Account
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Home
19: Your Account
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Photo Albums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Home
35: Forums
36: Photo Albums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Home
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Home
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Home
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Home
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Photo Albums
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Home
102: Home
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Home
126: Forums
127: Home
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Home
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Home
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Your Account
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Home
153: Forums
154: Home
155: Home
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Home
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Home
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Home
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Photo Albums
202: Photo Albums
203: Home
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Home
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Home
226: Forums
227: Home
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Home
234: Home
235: Forums
236: Statistics
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
01: Forums
02: Photo Albums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 306
 Pictures: 2389
  · Views: 591093
  · Votes: 1312
  · Comments: 86

Support our Advertisers

thought this might interest you lot...
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Super Member
Super Member

Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 8021
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2018 12:53 am    Post subject: thought this might interest you lot... Reply with quote

Hi all, just posting this so that if my words are changed in any way, the original response can be seen here, post dated.

Hi Nathan,
My name is ... I'm an reporter for The New York Times. I'm reaching out to you because I'm exploring the environmental effects of lead ammunition and I'm trying to get a better sense of the hunting community's feelings toward alternative ammo materials like copper. Specifically, I'm looking to learn the reasons a hunter might have for preferring lead ammunition over copper. Based on what I've gathered from reading your analysis of copper ammo on the Terminal Ballistics Knowledgebase, along with other comparisons of the two types of ammo, the hesitance to use copper seems to stem from these issues:

Some hunters fear switching to copper will mean sacrificing accuracy, since copper bullets must be made longer than their lead counterparts to compensate for their light weight, and longer bullets tend to be less stable in flight. Copper is also a harder metal that doesn’t fragment as easily as lead does, which some hunters say makes it less likely to inflict deadly damage.

Are you able to tell me whether my understanding is correct, and make me aware of any important points I might have missed? If possible, it would be great to have your emailed reply in the next few days.

Thanks, ....


Hi ..., sorry, I was very busy yesterday, my sincere apologies for this.

To begin with, the article I wrote online should provide you with clear and concise information. The photos and video provide evidence to back up claims.

Your questions do show some misunderstandings so I will address each in turn as succinctly as possible.

Regarding accuracy:

It is important to understand that mass production of affordable rifles poses accuracy limitations. Not all rifles are inherently accurate, in fact a major proportion of rifles are not. Add to this human error whether as a result of skill levels (e.g youths learning to shoot) or natural field errors (wind drift or animal moves just as the shot is taken) and it is very easy for the hunter to miss his mark. A proportion of rifles do not shoot a hard copper bullet with great accuracy, whether as a result of the twist rate (bullet length versus stability) or as a result of heavy copper fouling. The result of these errors combined with a poor bullet design is slow killing.

Regarding killing:

Your statement reads "which some hunters say makes it less likely to inflict deadly damage". The way you have angled this, is as if to say that you believe this is a matter of opinion. Please choose your words carefully. It is a fact that homogenous copper cannot produce wide wounding at low impact velocities in the same manner as a fragmenting bullet. Now understand this - the cartridges we are using are getting smaller each year. As people spend more time on computers and working in cities etc, they are no longer as physically strong as they once were. The rifles have become lighter to ease carry weight but along with this has come an interest in small, low powered, low recoiling cartridges. There are also states which only allow low velocity black powder cartridges to be used for certain hunting situations. In contrast to this, homogenous copper bullets work best when driven at high velocities and or when used out to moderate ranges only. When used in low powered cartridges and or out to extended ranges (e.g. mountain hunting), wounding can be narrow. Add to this the problems of rifle accuracy, human error and animal movement and the result is slow killing. Game may take hours or even days to expire from narrow wounding. Over penetration is also a concern (bullets passing through and striking other animals) as are ricochet events and also forest fires caused by the heat of deformed copper projectiles after striking hard materials.

Although you may believe that the major bullet makers have no concern for the environment, the truth is far from what some might have you imagine. The people who make the lead core projectiles have over many decades gone to great lengths to test the bullets in the field, continually improving killing performance, showing great concern for the animal hunted. These are men and women who love the land and have a deep respect for their heritage. When you hunt (whether as a bullet maker or regular hunter), one quickly develops a high level of empathy for game as the hunter is forced to confront his or her own mortality when claiming another life. The modern fragmenting lead core bullets have been optimized to produce extremely fast killing in the most ethical manner possible but most importantly - taking into account the realities of cartridge power, rifle error and human error.

However, one of my main concerns is that newer start up companies sometimes display a lack of long term field experience. The small companies making homogenous copper bullets sometimes make misleading claims and quite often use environmentally friendly' concepts to drive sales. When we buy into this type of marketing hype, everybody loses (perhaps with the exception of the growing bullet making company).

The true strengths of homogenous copper can be found when hunting very large bodied game or when hunting at close ranges to moderate ranges using very high velocity cartridges. Under these conditions, copper is able to produce both excellent wounding and deep penetration. Used in this manner, copper is immensely reliable.

It is simply a matter of understanding the strengths of Homogenous copper versus its limitations. By understanding its limitations, we put the animals first, not our opinions, or sales or environmental beliefs. Banning one type of bullet in favor of another without understanding the mechanics of wounding is simply unethical.

Given the choice, hunters believe that an animal should be treated respectfully, the life taken like a light switch flicking off rather than a lingering death. They feel that any animal suffering immense pain for hours or days is unethical and that the bullets designs should always address this as a primary focus.

It is also a myth that hunters fear change. Hunters actually embrace change to the point that they very much look forwards to the latest catalogues within the industry. Were it any other way, the gun and ammunition companies would fail abysmally at each new product launch. Hunters are keen to obtain any edge in the field and most especially with regards to ethical killing. So when hunters reject copper, it is inaccurate to blame the hunters as fearing change. What hunters fear, is causing unnecessary suffering to game.

Please be aware that during 2016, a non-lead fragmenting bullet design was put forwards to the state of California by an innovative bullet maker, but that his design was completely rejected. Since speaking to this bullet maker about this (and having tested his bullets on game), I no longer believe that the state of California has a true concern for game animal welfare. I now thoroughly believe that this subject has been used for political posturing. I also believe that hunters are now being treated with the same form of bigotry that was once assigned to native peoples. On the one hand, we are fine when watching a documentary showing a lioness hunting zebra and we are now finally OK visualizing indigenous people hunting in various locations. Yet on the other hand, any westerner that hunts is seen as primitive and un-evolved at all levels, whether emotionally, intellectually or based on current spiritual belief systems. Western environmentalists want to be closer to the land, yet exclude themselves from it as if any human with white skin is unnatural. This guilt based thinking simply drives us further form a true union with the land and our place within it.

I hope that helps to explain some of the major issues. Again, please use the online article to learn more about the mechanics of wounding and fast versus slow killing.

All the best.

copied from Nathans web site terminal ballistics research...... be interesting to see what does get published.

You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Super Member
Super Member

Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 14227
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:14 am    Post subject: Re: thought this might interest you lot... Reply with quote

Is this your son Nathan mate? If so, he certainly writes very well and gets his ideas across in a very clear and concise manner.

Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Super Member
Super Member

Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 8021
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 6:33 pm    Post subject: Re: thought this might interest you lot... Reply with quote

nope Mate...Nathan Foster .. terminal balistics research fella. heck of a nice guy who knows how to shoot and what is what. gives up a lot of his time to help others out.

You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.