Pumpkinslinger wrote: |
The jackass is on his own property so I doubt there is anything we can do about it, even with the "no harassment" laws. |
Vince wrote: |
If I read the articles posted by OV1 correctly...this guy is doing the wrong thing. There is no doubt in my mind that this guy is deliberately trying to disturb and spook any wildlife in order to disrupt your hunt. If you are able to prove his actions Punkin, then you have him by the ball$ and it's just a matter of how hoard you want to squeeze them mate. My only concern is the "opening" left him to "undertake lawful activities" in order to create noise in order to spook animals. quote: "This subsection does not apply to a person who incidentally interferes with the taking of wildlife resources while using the land for other lawful activity such as agriculture, mining, or recreation. This subsection also does not apply to activity by a person on land he owns or leases." unquote. It is the last sentence that causes me the most concern. I believe that it is open to "wide" interpretation. Cheers, Vince |
All times are GMT - 7 Hours