HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 468
BOT: 1
Total: 469
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: News
02: Photo Albums
03: Forums
04: Home
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Home
11: Your Account
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Your Account
17: Forums
18: Your Account
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Your Account
24: Your Account
25: Your Account
26: Forums
27: Home
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Home
32: Forums
33: Your Account
34: Home
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Photo Albums
40: Your Account
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Home
45: Home
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Photo Albums
49: Photo Albums
50: Home
51: Your Account
52: Home
53: Forums
54: Photo Albums
55: Forums
56: Home
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Your Account
62: Forums
63: Home
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Home
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: News
77: Photo Albums
78: Your Account
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Home
82: Your Account
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Your Account
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Your Account
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Your Account
107: Forums
108: Home
109: News
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Photo Albums
113: Forums
114: Photo Albums
115: Forums
116: Home
117: Photo Albums
118: Photo Albums
119: Forums
120: Photo Albums
121: Home
122: Forums
123: Home
124: Your Account
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Your Account
129: Home
130: Your Account
131: Your Account
132: Home
133: Forums
134: Photo Albums
135: Photo Albums
136: Photo Albums
137: Home
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Your Account
141: Forums
142: Your Account
143: Forums
144: Your Account
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Photo Albums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Home
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Photo Albums
169: Forums
170: Home
171: Your Account
172: Articles: Topics
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Your Account
178: Home
179: Forums
180: Statistics
181: Home
182: Photo Albums
183: Photo Albums
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Photo Albums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Your Account
200: Photo Albums
201: Photo Albums
202: Forums
203: Home
204: Home
205: Photo Albums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Your Account
212: Home
213: Your Account
214: Your Account
215: Photo Albums
216: Home
217: Photo Albums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Photo Albums
222: Photo Albums
223: Your Account
224: News
225: Forums
226: Your Account
227: Forums
228: Home
229: Forums
230: Home
231: Forums
232: Home
233: Photo Albums
234: Your Account
235: Home
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Your Account
242: Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Forums
246: Your Account
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Your Account
251: Photo Albums
252: Forums
253: Home
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Home
258: Photo Albums
259: Forums
260: Home
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Your Account
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Home
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Photo Albums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Your Account
277: Forums
278: Photo Albums
279: Photo Albums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Your Account
284: Home
285: Home
286: Home
287: Statistics
288: Forums
289: Home
290: Photo Albums
291: Forums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Home
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Your Account
299: Forums
300: Forums
301: Your Account
302: Photo Albums
303: Forums
304: Home
305: Forums
306: Home
307: Photo Albums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Your Account
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Photo Albums
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Forums
321: Home
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Photo Albums
325: Your Account
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Your Account
329: Photo Albums
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Home
333: Forums
334: Home
335: Your Account
336: Forums
337: Forums
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Home
347: Your Account
348: Forums
349: Forums
350: Home
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Your Account
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Your Account
359: Forums
360: Home
361: Forums
362: Photo Albums
363: Photo Albums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Forums
367: Forums
368: Photo Albums
369: Forums
370: Photo Albums
371: Home
372: Forums
373: Home
374: Home
375: Forums
376: Forums
377: Forums
378: Photo Albums
379: Photo Albums
380: Forums
381: Forums
382: Your Account
383: Home
384: Photo Albums
385: Forums
386: Forums
387: Forums
388: Forums
389: Forums
390: Forums
391: Your Account
392: Forums
393: Your Account
394: Forums
395: Photo Albums
396: Forums
397: Forums
398: Photo Albums
399: Forums
400: Photo Albums
401: Your Account
402: Forums
403: Forums
404: Forums
405: Home
406: Forums
407: Forums
408: Forums
409: Photo Albums
410: Forums
411: News
412: Your Account
413: Forums
414: Your Account
415: Forums
416: Your Account
417: Your Account
418: Forums
419: Home
420: Forums
421: Forums
422: Forums
423: Forums
424: Forums
425: Forums
426: Your Account
427: Forums
428: Forums
429: Forums
430: Forums
431: Your Account
432: Forums
433: Forums
434: Forums
435: Forums
436: Photo Albums
437: Forums
438: Forums
439: Forums
440: Forums
441: Your Account
442: Your Account
443: Forums
444: Your Account
445: Forums
446: Forums
447: Home
448: Forums
449: Your Account
450: Forums
451: Forums
452: Forums
453: Forums
454: Forums
455: Forums
456: Forums
457: Forums
458: Forums
459: Home
460: Your Account
461: Forums
462: Forums
463: Forums
464: Your Account
465: Forums
466: Forums
467: Forums
468: Forums
  BOT:
01: News

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820725
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

.243 cal. ?
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SwampFox
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 15, 2005
Posts: 1040
Location: Destin, Florida

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:51 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Glockman,
The 243 is a fine round. I just like the 260 better due to bullet weight selection. That is the reason I do not own a "put together" 243 at this moment. If you have not bought the 243 yet, take a look at a 260 with a 1-8 twist barrel.

If you have the 243, the answer is that it can be used for dogs to deer without a problem. So you are good to go in both directions.
Ed

_________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.
-Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5001
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Like SwampFox I picked a .260 over the .243 because of bullet selection. But keep in mind I was looking more for a "light deer gun" than a "varmint gun".

Friends who shoot .243s seem to love them.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
glockman55
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 831
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Thanks Guys, I just thought I would try to pick a cal. that would work for a few different applications. and another excuse to buy another cal. I do have a 30-30 and a 7 mag. and would like to get a .270 or .280 some day too. You can never have enough. Laughing

_________________
Are you boys gonna pull them pistols or whistle dixie?
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:32 pm    Post subject: .243 cal. Conversion Idea Reply with quote

Hi all,

I'm new here but I couldn't resist the .243 thread, so heres my bone-head/pipe-dream idea for the Ishapore 2A1 (stripped down for a TAC/Sniper role) wtf

I'm guessing were talking about the .243WIN cartridge? The case has near identical dimentions as the .308WIN except for the smaller neck. I have an Ishapore 2A1 (7.62x51 NATO) that with only a barrel change these rifles would be easily converted to .243WIN. Since the rifles are manufactured to modern specs and swapping in a new barrel will only strengthen them, you could really find out what that .243 will do! The action length is the perfect fit, and I can cycle .243 snap-caps through the .308 action with out a hic-up, which means the original magazines will work with out any modifications!

Anyways just a thought... Shiner

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 5001
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly, take a look at the .260 Rem. Its a .308 necked down to .264 and, in my opinion, is more versatile than the .243.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Pumpkinslinger wrote:
MGKelly, take a look at the .260 Rem. Its a .308 necked down to .264 and, in my opinion, is more versatile than the .243.

If the cartridge OAL and dimentions are close enough on the Remmington as it is on most all of the .xxxWIN series I'm sure it would be no problem the 2A1 has an action length just made for the .243-.270-.308 WIN family of rifle ammo. Being a believer in delivering more PROJECTILE downrange whenever possible the .260 does make more sense. The .308 isn't known for its "ultraflat" trajectory, I wonder how flat and how fast you could get a .260 to go (safely, that is).

M. G. Confused

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
1895ss
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Posts: 2612
Location: Not Here...!!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:11 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly wrote:
I wonder how flat and how fast you could get a .260 to go (safely, that is).M. G. Confused

Aprox 3100 fps (100 gr) to 2600 fps (160 gr)

data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp
data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp

_________________
A cruel truth is much more desirable than a really nice lie.
'Tis far better to walk alone than to follow a crowd or an a**hole going the wrong way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1005
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:14 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Although countless deer, antelope and more than a few black bear have been killed with most of the 6MMs (.243 Winchester, 6MM Remington etc.) and I have shot a few deer and many coyotes using the .243. I am just not comfortable with any cartridges for medium to large game under .25 caliber. This is only a personal prejudice and anyone who dotes on these cartridges is welcome to do so. The .243 can be brilliantly accurate and a great coyote gun (though maybe a bit hard on pelts). If used for deer, premium bullets in the 90 to 100-grain range should be used and shots taken carefully.

A further consideration is for the handloader: The .243 Winchester is said to occasionally show unpredictable pressure spikes even with safe loads. I have never experienced this but it is an issue to be considered.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:56 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

I believe it has to do with what it is one is trying to accomplish, the military is a good example of how one's thinking can change (albeit SLOWLY) over the years. Sleep

Since the early 1900's the cartridge to beat was the .30, (30.06 to be more exact) and served until the early 1960's, but we haven't fought any trench or wide open shooting wars in a while. Then we went the opposite direction to .223 and have used that for near 40 years (with a blend of 7.62 mixed in: M-60, M14). Most combat takes place at 100 yards or less and 30.06 is just a little over powered (if you could get the bad guys to stand singlefile facing you while you shoot them you could get at least 6 of 'em at a time!) and unless it's chambered in a relatively heavy rifle (M-1) the recoil leaves a bit to be desired. I don't have a lot of faith in the 5.56mm either, yes I know they are capable of one shot/one kill performance, but I just like being able to throw bigger rocks than my fellow caveman. Laughing

Now they're looking at 6.8 SPC and some other 6.x stuff and best of all: finaly considering dumping that confounded gas tube for a gas piston system (the AR rifles have needed a gas piston since day one) maybe now the AR will be accurate, clean, and reliable. ...but thats another story.

Military requirements aren't all that different from sporting requirements though; you need a cartridge/rifle with enough bullet, enough speed, flat trajectory, and low enough recoil for an accurate followup shot if necessary... oh, yeah, and do it every time!

...and then there's the shooters... Nananana



Who knows, maybe the 6mm family of ammo can do it with the right combination of case , powder, and bullet design. It's worth watching.

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Dimitri
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 25, 2005
Posts: 5944

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:18 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGKelly wrote:
Now they're looking at 6.8 SPC and some other 6.x stuff and best of all: finaly considering dumping that confounded gas tube for a gas piston system (the AR rifles have needed a gas piston since day one) maybe now the AR will be accurate, clean, and reliable.

I wouldn't count on ether happening any time soon. Both have been looked at but don't provide enough of a benefit to make a switch from the reports I've read. Smile

The AR family of rifles seems to be doing well, considering the Army recently adopted the XM110 sniper rifles, a AR based rifle in 308Win without a piston. And the Navy's been using them for their SEALS for a long time, and the Marines have purchased more of the Navy units. Smile

Nevermind the countless Special Forces units world wide which prefer and use the AR-15 series of rifles verses the alternatives such as the HK G36, Styer AUG, SA80, SIG 550 etc which most of them ARE indeed piston gas system firearms.

Dimitri

_________________
A thousand hills, but no birds in flight, ten thousand paths, with no people's tracks. A lonely boat, a straw-hatted old man, fishing alone in the cold river snow.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:19 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

I don't have fond memories of 16A1's and A2's, especially after long engagements with numerous bursts of full auto mixed in. The carbon-crud would just run out of the bottom of the receiver and the mag-well almost like water. When they did malfunction half the battle was trying to find the location of the problem due to the thick even grayish coating everything had from the gas tube blasting all the fouling straight into the receiver, magazine, and trigger group. When we cleaned them we dunked them in big drums of parts cleaner to get the thickest crud off, then we finished cleaning in the normal fashion. Confused

It doesn't suprise me that XM110 was accepted, in the sniper role the need to hose down an area on full auto doesn't arise too often. As a sniper you take a couple of shots and its off to find a new hide, because the rifle is fired less often means it is easier to keep clean so the fact it's not a piston driven action in this case would not have a lot of bearing on the choice.

The piston rifles have their drawbacks too...

I find the need for a recoil-buffer in both my SKS and WASR, and is essentially is for the optics. My SKS has a receiver-cover scope mount which fits perfectly and maintains zero, the buffer is installed to protect the scope from the "impact" of the bolt carrier/bolt assy. when it hits the rear of the receiver. I find the same thing in my AK clone, even though it has a siderail receiver mount when that boltcarrier/bolt hits the rear of the receiver, with out the buffers the optics would die an early death.

...and no, the recoil buffers don't really do much to reduce "felt recoil", they just protect the innerparts from beatting each other up.

Sorry, it's late and I'm blathering on... Point

gotta catch some sacktime!

Have a good one all,

M. G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
alaskanativeson
Member
Member


Joined: Mar 02, 2008
Posts: 30
Location: Rural Alaska

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

SingleShotLover wrote:
...I am just not comfortable with any cartridges for medium to large game under .25 caliber...

I have to agree with this one. I see that a few people here have said the .243 is a good for elk. That is, of course, their choice to make. For myself I'd consider I was being unethical going after elk with a .243, they're just not enough of a cartridge for game that size. I'd consider it for mulies but only if I was going for antlerless. Can you kill an elk or a big mule deer with a .243? Yes. However I don't like having to rely on luck as one of my factors any more than I must.

I remember an article written by Bob Milek in Guns and Ammo magazine where he talked about the .243. He said when it first came out he thought he had the finest cartridge ever made, the magical thunderbolt from the hand of Zeus. When he had several years more experience losing elk at relatively close range with what he KNEW to be good solid hits he decided that it wasn't enough gun for the big wapiti. I'll agree with him.

_________________
Freedom isn't free - My taxes prove that!
Back to top
View user's profile
Morax
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Posts: 618
Location: Pittsburgh Pa

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

from up close and personal experiance with a elk on a motorcycle (how he got the helmet on i donno) and also owning a .243 I would never go after an elk with it.. biggest i would go would be a larger end mule deer and that wouldnt be at extreme distance. from whitetail down though i would the .243 with no questions asked..
Back to top
View user's profile
MGKelly
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Posts: 24
Location: G. R. Michigan

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:12 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

Morax wrote:
from up close and personal experiance with a elk on a motorcycle (how he got the helmet on i donno) and also owning a .243...

Yeah, gettin' them helmets on them elk aint no easy matter, but the elk had a .243 too? I though it was only legal to Keep and Arm Bears! Confused

(Sorry, couldn't resist!)

The .243 is a great cartridge, very versatile, and I agree there is a certain upper-limit to what you can reliably take with it. I want enough bullet on target to do enough damage to the vitals to drop my target right about where I shot it. I say it that way cause over the years I've had to track or help track a few that refused to fall down when shot (no fun). At least one of those was a great heart/lung shot but my friend was using a .243 (soft-tip), he had shot a solid good sized 7 point, the bullet didn't seem to expand either (small exit hole). We tracked him probably 300-400yds, seemed like 400miles, in swampy Michigan scrub/jack pine, in the dark,

...up hill both ways! Laughing

Probably a lil off topic, has anyone seen the articles in some of the gun rags about deer hunting with the 5.56mm(AR)? I know folks do it, but it just seems a little too much on the small size. The only reason it's good at killing humans is because of the way it bounces around inside, not a good attribute for hunting I would think. Maybe a new thread?

M.G.

_________________
Doing the "right" thing for the wrong reason is still wrong.

PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals

Euthanasia: Viet Nam
Euthanmideast: Iraq
Back to top
View user's profile
Morax
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Posts: 618
Location: Pittsburgh Pa

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:47 am    Post subject: Re: .243 cal. ? Reply with quote

MGK i agree and i am a very big propnant FOR the 243, but its like everything out there, if you as a hunter,owner,user, its up to you to feel compfy with what you are using for the critter you are going after, being undergunned is worse than missing with something bigger than needed!! where i hunt the 243 is more than enough for the whitetails and the g-hogs, but now if i go into the woods deeper i want something with a bit more a$$ behind it..
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.