HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: jander6442
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12745

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 117
BOT: 2
Total: 119
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Home
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Home
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Photo Albums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Photo Albums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Home
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Home
26: Forums
27: Photo Albums
28: Forums
29: Home
30: Photo Albums
31: Photo Albums
32: Forums
33: Home
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Home
39: Home
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Home
47: Your Account
48: Home
49: Forums
50: Home
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Photo Albums
55: Home
56: Forums
57: Your Account
58: Home
59: Photo Albums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Photo Albums
64: Photo Albums
65: Photo Albums
66: Photo Albums
67: Photo Albums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: News
71: Forums
72: Photo Albums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Your Account
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Home
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Photo Albums
97: Home
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Home
101: Your Account
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Photo Albums
110: Forums
111: Photo Albums
112: Photo Albums
113: Your Account
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2379
  · Views: 577220
  · Votes: 1312
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

accurate data on 22 hornet question
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aloysius
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 2197
Location: B., Belgium

PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:50 am    Post subject: Re: accurate data on 22 hornet question Reply with quote

Can I put a question here? Isn't it so that on the burning rate list of Accurate the 2015 is only 1 step slower than the 1680? Then how should I understand "way too slow" ? In my dictionary "way too slow" is something like comparing a 3100 with a N° 2...
When I look at the burning rates, I know MY .22 Hornet (an Anschütz you would also adore) likes N110, PCl512, H110... so looking at Accurate I would think 4100 would do the trick (and that's much faster than the 1680).

I'm a little bit afraid that when I step over to N120, which has about the burning rate of A-1680, the Hornet-case is to small to get enough powder in to reach a decent velocity.
I use N120 in my short barreled Winchester in 30/30 Win, so the 1680 could also fit in there.

That's the funny thing about reloading, you never know it all...
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4589
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:05 am    Post subject: Re: accurate data on 22 hornet question Reply with quote

Aloysius, I've noticed that powders can move around on that "burning rate" list, depending on who put the list out. And ALL of them say not to use the list to substitute powders.

www.hodgdon.com/burn-rate.html

www.reloadbench.com/burn.html

www.reloadersnest.com/burnrates.asp

Good article here >> www.chuckhawks.com/pow...n_rate.htm

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
dan1dad
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2011
Posts: 247
Location: St.Louis Missery

PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: accurate data on 22 hornet question Reply with quote

Aloysius wrote:
Can I put a question here? Isn't it so that on the burning rate list of Accurate the 2015 is only 1 step slower than the 1680? Then how should I understand "way too slow" ? In my dictionary "way too slow" is something like comparing a 3100 with a N° 2...
When I look at the burning rates, I know MY .22 Hornet (an Anschütz you would also adore) likes N110, PCl512, H110... so looking at Accurate I would think 4100 would do the trick (and that's much faster than the 1680).

I'm a little bit afraid that when I step over to N120, which has about the burning rate of A-1680, the Hornet-case is to small to get enough powder in to reach a decent velocity.
I use N120 in my short barreled Winchester in 30/30 Win, so the 1680 could also fit in there.

That's the funny thing about reloading, you never know it all...


I found out that trying to load with 2015br that the hornet is too small for the recommended powder. It over fills the cartridge, and its hard to compress the powder that is outside the case. I had been loading with Alliant 2400 at around 9.5 gr with ok results, but I was looking for something a little different to run with. I thought 2015br would be good as its also used in many of the other cartridges I have. I like to minimize the amounts of powders , keep it simple type of philosophy.
Back to top
View user's profile
dan1dad
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2011
Posts: 247
Location: St.Louis Missery

PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:34 pm    Post subject: Re: accurate data on 22 hornet question Reply with quote

a side bar since Ive been doing a little research on just how many gun powder companies General Dynamics Doesnt own. The list is smaller for Does not own than does own, but I ran across this interesting tid bit, I thought at least.

-------------------------------
Lighting the Fuse on Gunpowder Fraud
For decades, the St. Marks Powder company, has been producing gunpowder for the military but not testing it as required. St. Marks, a division of General Dynamics, sells about $100 million worth of gunpowder every year, most of it used in small-caliber weapons. General Dynamics rushed to self-disclose the fraud when they found out a whistleblower might come forward. Under the FCA, a company is required to pay double damages, rather than triple damages, if they self-disclose.

www.boydcfe.com/news.html

--------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.