HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: tims
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12624

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 337
BOT: 1
Total: 338
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: News
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Your Account
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Home
21: Photo Albums
22: Home
23: Forums
24: Home
25: Your Account
26: News
27: Forums
28: Your Account
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Photo Albums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Your Account
37: Forums
38: Your Account
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Articles: Topics
45: News
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Your Account
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Home
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Your Account
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Photo Albums
77: Forums
78: Photo Albums
79: Photo Albums
80: Forums
81: Photo Albums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Your Account
86: Forums
87: Home
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Home
91: Home
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Photo Albums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Photo Albums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Home
121: Your Account
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Your Account
125: Your Account
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Home
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Your Account
134: Your Account
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Photo Albums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Your Account
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: PointBlank Online
154: Forums
155: Photo Albums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Your Account
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Home
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Photo Albums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: State F&G Agencies
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Photo Albums
183: Photo Albums
184: Photo Albums
185: Photo Albums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Photo Albums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Photo Albums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Home
199: Your Account
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Your Account
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Photo Albums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Photo Albums
221: Your Account
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Photo Albums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Statistics
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Your Account
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Your Account
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Photo Albums
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: News
251: Your Account
252: Forums
253: Photo Albums
254: Forums
255: Photo Albums
256: Photo Albums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Your Account
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Photo Albums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Home
270: Home
271: Your Account
272: Your Account
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Your Account
276: Forums
277: Photo Albums
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Photo Albums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Photo Albums
286: Forums
287: Forums
288: Photo Albums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Photo Albums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Home
295: Forums
296: Photo Albums
297: Photo Albums
298: Forums
299: Forums
300: Photo Albums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Photo Albums
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Forums
321: Your Account
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Forums
325: Forums
326: Forums
327: Photo Albums
328: Forums
329: Forums
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Photo Albums
333: Home
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Forums
337: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2362
  · Views: 452892
  · Votes: 1310
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

6.8 SPC Bullet Performance
Big Game Hunting topics that dont fit other categories
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Big Game Hunting

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7567
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:42 pm    Post subject: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

I had the opportunity to take six bullet 6.8 SPC combinations to the range and test terminal performance. My goals was to verify the bullet I would be using for deer and hogs. I tested performance using a bullet “trap” that I have used for a couple of years. The trap consists of a gallon jug of water (typically an empty milk jug) in front of a box of phone books and magazines. The water jug provides the hydraulic medium to effect bullet expansion/mushrooming and the box catches the bullets and provides relative penetration performance. I’ve used this bullet trap with .223 Rem to .300 Win Mag and have seen similar results on elk I have harvested with a .270 Win. With that said, I realize this method of testing is not as good a medium as ballistic gelatin but that’s a whole other story and to inconvenient to use as a private individual. More details on the bullet trap can be found in this on-line article. Note, I now use a single phone book in front of multiple magazines like G&A, Shooting Times, etc.

www.huntingnut.com/ind...cle&sid=84

These are the bullets and their respective muzzle velocities shot from and 18-inch PSA SS SPR barrel. There was a 15+ mph headwind and the temperature was 48F.
85gr Barnes TSX - 2815 fps (31.0gr AA2200)
90gr Sierra HP - 2775 fps (30.5gr AA2200)
95gr Barnes TTSX - 2805 fps (29.6gr AA2200)
110gr Hornady V-Max - 2615 fps (factory)
110gr Hornady HPBT - 2640 fps (factory)
120gr Hornady SST - 2525 fps (27.5gr AA2200)
Here is a picture of the 6.8mm (0.277”) bullets used with some .270 Win bullets I typically load on the right side for reference.



.277 bullet comparison.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  134.69 KB
 Viewed:  8986 Time(s)

.277 bullet comparison.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7567
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

The results were more than interesting as you can see in the picture below. Note, I had only worked up loads for the 95 TTSX. All the other bullets arrived from Midway the day before and I loaded up enough rounds at a safe powder charge to put 2 on paper to judge POI then one into the trap. I plan to work up my loads for accuracy and velocity prior to repeating this test at longer range.

85gr Barnes TSX - perfect expansion. After testing numerous Barnes and Hornady GMX monolithic bullets in various calibers, I expected nothing less. Every one of these bullets I have shot has had reliable and flawless expansion with 100% weight retention. The penetration was not quite through the phone book (note, the velocity is less than what I would expect after I develop this load).

90gr Sierra HP - completely fragmented, did not penetrate into the box of paper, and was not recovered. This wasn’t surprising for a varmint HP.

95gr Barnes TTSX - this is the bullet I had planned to hunt with before I even started my 6.8 project. I bought the others to have a comparison and learn more about my newly built rifle. This bullet did not disappoint and shows why it has such an excellent reputation in the 6.8 community. It mushroomed to 0.556” – the largest I have ever recovered including .308 caliber bullets. It was fully expanded and as you can see was shorter than the 85gr TSX. It penetrated through the phone book and one magazine. Note, my .270 GMX bullet penetrates through 7 more magazine issues. This will be my go-to bullet for hunting deer with a 6.8 SPC.

110gr Hornady V-Max - the bullet flattened, barely made it through the water jug, and was laying on the ground in front of the box. Only 52 grains of the bullet remained. IMO, not the best bullet for deer or hogs.

110gr Hornady HPBT - fragmented and went ½-way into the phone book. The jacket separated from the lead core and the largest fragment recovered was 32gr. I plan to use this one as my general purpose/target shooting bullet. Just wanted to see what it would do.

120gr Hornady SST – this was the biggest surprise for me. I thought this bullet at this low a velocity would have retained more weight. The jacket separated from the lead core and the largest fragment recovered was 30gr. It was hard to distinguish from the Hornady HPBT. The 30gr lead fragment did make it through the phone book and into 3 magazines, however, I have often found a projectile with a smaller diameter will penetrate further than a larger diameter projectile with more energy, e.g., I’ve had a 130 gr .270 Win GMX out penetrate the a 165gr .300 Win Mag GMX. I anticipate this bullet will perform better in a longer range test when it is at a lower velocity.



6.8 bullet performance comparison 100 yards.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  220.48 KB
 Viewed:  8985 Time(s)

6.8 bullet performance comparison 100 yards.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7567
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:44 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

General Observations:
- The expansion must be very rapid for both the TSX and TTSX as the jugs jumped over 10 feet away while all the other bullets only moved their jugs 2 or 3 feet.
- In the case of the 95 TTSX, I wouldn’t be concerned if I need to drop velocity a bit to achieve better accuracy for my particular rifle. Based on this performance, I believe it will open up/mushroom at the advertised 1600-1700 fps.
- There were many small lead fragments, more like flakes embedded in the paper that were not recoverable. I know that fragmentation is lethal, however, I have found that penetration and the path of penetration is not always reliable or predictable with lead-core bullets that fragment like this. I’ve seen a Core-Lokt shot from a .300 Win Mag fragment and not even penetrate the outside of the cardboard box. I also don’t like to lose meat to lead fragments. I’ve watched a butch remove an elk’s shoulder and toss it because it was full of lead fragments. I always lost the far shoulder when I hunted deer with fragmenting Fusion bullets.
- I would expect that a bullet like the Nosler Accubond with is bonded lead core would have retained its core and ultimately had better weight retention. I may have to look for an opportunity to test one of these bullets.

The testing isn’t over. I need to work up loads optimized for my rifle and head back to the range to test more, likely 300 yards. That may not be for a couple of months will all the activities coming up.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7545
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:11 am    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

great post Slim. the 110 grn hornady hp flat base projectiles I used for wallabies blew to pieces too but they sure killed those varmits well if very messy. most times a 1ltr sized hole and heaps of bruising/gelled tissue damage. are you not a nosler ballistic tip fan??? they SHOULD be good at the velocities you are looking at and alot cheaper than the barnes.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
English Mike
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 1321
Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 5:42 am    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

A mate of mine took a cow elk with his 6.8SPC AR15 & 110gr Barnes TSX bullets.
Two quick shots & fell where it stood.
I've seen the same bullet type but .30cal 168gr boat tail drop a cow elk at just shy of 700yds too.
They're a very versatile bullet design.
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7567
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:25 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

English Mike wrote:
A mate of mine took a cow elk with his 6.8SPC AR15 & 110gr Barnes TSX bullets. Two quick shots & fell where it stood.

You have to watch how the 110gr Barnes TSX is used in a 6.8 SPC. TSX bullets have to have 2100 fps or more on impact to expand. Because its copper instead of lead-based, its about as long as 130gr bullet eating up powder volume. Average muzzle velocities are just over 2400 fps which doesn't leave much margin. If the distance is much beyond 100 yards, over-penetration occurs. The 95gr TTSX starts opening at 1600 fps plus starts out about 400 fps faster providing 900 fps more margin. That's why the 95 TTSX is such a great round for the 6.8 SPC.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:36 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.8 SPC Bullet Performance Reply with quote

Good post, as always.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Big Game Hunting
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.