HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: 38$uper
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12443

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 387
BOT: 4
Total: 391
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Your Account
03: Photo Albums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Your Account
11: Photo Albums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Photo Albums
22: Home
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Photo Albums
31: News
32: Photo Albums
33: Photo Albums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Your Account
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Photo Albums
43: Photo Albums
44: Forums
45: Photo Albums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Your Account
51: Photo Albums
52: Home
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Your Account
57: Photo Albums
58: Photo Albums
59: Photo Albums
60: Photo Albums
61: Photo Albums
62: Photo Albums
63: Forums
64: Photo Albums
65: Forums
66: Photo Albums
67: Photo Albums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Photo Albums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Photo Albums
127: Photo Albums
128: Photo Albums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Photo Albums
144: Forums
145: Photo Albums
146: Photo Albums
147: Photo Albums
148: Forums
149: Photo Albums
150: Photo Albums
151: Photo Albums
152: Photo Albums
153: Photo Albums
154: Photo Albums
155: Photo Albums
156: Photo Albums
157: Photo Albums
158: Photo Albums
159: Photo Albums
160: Home
161: Home
162: Photo Albums
163: Photo Albums
164: Photo Albums
165: Photo Albums
166: Photo Albums
167: Photo Albums
168: Photo Albums
169: Photo Albums
170: Photo Albums
171: Photo Albums
172: Photo Albums
173: Photo Albums
174: Photo Albums
175: Photo Albums
176: Photo Albums
177: Photo Albums
178: Home
179: Photo Albums
180: Home
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Photo Albums
209: Photo Albums
210: Photo Albums
211: Photo Albums
212: Forums
213: Photo Albums
214: Home
215: Home
216: News
217: Your Account
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Photo Albums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Photo Albums
229: Photo Albums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Your Account
236: Your Account
237: Photo Albums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Your Account
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Home
248: Forums
249: Home
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: PointBlank Ballistics
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Photo Albums
262: Forums
263: Forums
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Home
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Photo Albums
270: Home
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Your Account
275: Photo Albums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Photo Albums
287: Photo Albums
288: Photo Albums
289: Photo Albums
290: Photo Albums
291: Forums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Forums
300: Forums
301: Your Account
302: Photo Albums
303: Forums
304: Photo Albums
305: Photo Albums
306: Photo Albums
307: Photo Albums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Forums
311: Photo Albums
312: Photo Albums
313: Photo Albums
314: Photo Albums
315: Photo Albums
316: Photo Albums
317: Photo Albums
318: Photo Albums
319: Photo Albums
320: Photo Albums
321: Photo Albums
322: Forums
323: Forums
324: Forums
325: Photo Albums
326: Photo Albums
327: Photo Albums
328: Forums
329: Photo Albums
330: Photo Albums
331: Photo Albums
332: Home
333: Photo Albums
334: Forums
335: Forums
336: Forums
337: Photo Albums
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Photo Albums
342: Photo Albums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Forums
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Forums
362: Forums
363: Forums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Photo Albums
367: Forums
368: Forums
369: Home
370: Photo Albums
371: Photo Albums
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: Forums
375: Forums
376: Forums
377: Forums
378: Forums
379: Forums
380: Forums
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Forums
384: Forums
385: Your Account
386: Forums
387: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums
02: Forums
03: News
04: Your Account

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 301
 Pictures: 2358
  · Views: 285231
  · Votes: 1297
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . .
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

Once in awhile I get in the mood to simply blather away at a given subject. Therefore, I disclaim that any of the following is accurate or objective. To the contrary it is very subjective and you may wish to skip this post and move on to something more concise and more of interest.

I've owned a multitude of handguns over the years and, candidly, most of them have been superb whether Colt, Freedom Arms, Kimber, Ruger, S&W, Dan Wesson, Glock, Beretta, SIG, et al. In fact, the safe contains one or more samples of each of these and others, a result of being involved in handguns since pre Internet times, pre cable times, pre . . . . you get the idea. None of these handguns are part of any collection, rather simply an accumulation based on fancy.

The most useful of all the revolvers has been the single action Rugers of which I have several Vaqueros, Blackhawk and Super Blackhawks chambered in an assortment of 41 mag, 44-40, 44 mag and 45 Colt. The Vaqueros are about the most rugged indestrucable handgun I own. They are not tempermental in any sense of the word, a usually accurate from the factory and carry all the whallop needed to get any job done on the N American continent for which a handgun would be used. MO, of course.

The Rugers are easy to maintain and, once done a few times, a breeze to take down to the component parts. Trigger jobs are a cinch -- I'm not referring to the changing of weaker springs either. They lend themselves well to any degree of customizing an owner wishes to perform. For example, many of my Vaqueros and Blackhawks have the SBH or the Bisley hammer, something I prefer for ease of operation.

There is a plethora of grips and holsters, too. Often these can be found used for a utilitarian application or one can pay several hundreds of dollars for custom items, but, the point is that it is all available via the Net and, often, local gunshops or classifieds.

A visit to John Linebaugh's website will confirm the strength of the Ruger and extoll the virtures of the 45 Colt for handloaders over most other cartridges, especially the 44 Magnum. My personal testing confirms not only this, but, that a hot loaded 45 Colt in a Ruger Vaquero or BH will handily outperform the 44 Magnum, a cartridge I also enjoy shooting. 280gr cast bullets @1,572 fps from a 7 1/2" barrel absolutely rocks. But, the other Ruger chamberings are at home in many applications. The 44-40 may be among the most "fun" handguns especially when blackpowder is added to the menu.

At the time of its introduction (1873, along with the 45-70 and 45 Colt) the 44-40 offered significant advances in velocity and versatility. While the thin cases can present the reloader with a situation that needs careful handling, the shooting characteristic of revolvers so chambered is distinctive.

On the other end of the scale, using FFFg in a 44 Mag Vaquero can be a blast with some amazing results in accuracy, although the 45 Colt gets most of the attention when BP is the subject. SPG lube is a blessing and great cast bullets are available with SPG from Beartooth Bullets, on line, in Dover, Idaho. Marshall Stanton of BTB should be the cast bullet guru given his experiences and capability. Now, there is a good site to visit. Good forums, too.

Bull elk, black bear, mule deer, moutail lion, coues deer, antelope, coyote, bobcat and marmots have all fallen to my Ruger handguns. When I'm headed backcountry to drive, hike, hunt or walk, a Ruger will be close at hand. When guiding elk hunters (8 years) I noted most guides had a Ruger with them, guns that get abused by weather and conditions on a regular basis.

So, when I see a Ruger SAA I have a feeling bordering on reverence for the integrity of the design, the honesty of its presentation and the fact that it may be not only the most utilitarian of handguns, but, the most elegant as well.

YMMV


Last edited by Handloader on Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3382
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

I understand your feelings and agree - You have stated what I feel as a Ruger owner.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
robfromaz1977
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 179
Location: Arizona's White Mountains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

Handloader wrote:
"A visit to John Linebaugh's website will confirm the strength of the Ruger and extoll the virtures of the 45 Colt for handloaders over most other cartridges, especially the 44 Magnum. My personal testing confirms not only this, but, that a hot loaded 45 Colt in a Ruger Vaquero or BH will handily outperform the 44 Magnum, a cartridge I also enjoy shooting."


I just read that same write up the other day and was amazed. After reading it a couple of times, (I printed it out) I was a little confused as to the strength of the Rugers. He states that a 44 mag Super Black Hawk was destroyed at 80,000 cup and a Smith model 29 had compairable results. Then he states that today we have stronger guns chambered in 44 mag (Redhawk prime example). Am I to believe that the Redhawks are stronger than the Blackhawks? I am only curious because I want to shoot a higher pressure load from my Redhawk and want to do it safely. I don't want to try and approach the level of pressure he does but want a little more than factory loads produce. Any help on this would be great. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 7:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

The Redhawks are a stronger, beefier design than the Super Blackhawks. I own both, and like them both, but the redhawk is definitely heavier duty in factory form.
Back to top
View user's profile
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

At some point it becomes academic as to whether one handgun is stronger than another when considering the Blackhawk vs Redhawk. The case itself will rupture before either reach a disassembly pressure and the load to do that would be far off the chart.

The main advantage of the Redhawk is in driving very large nails in very tough hardwood, due to its weight. OTOH, the Blackhawk has a balance and pointability that would preclude its useage as a mere hammer.
Back to top
View user's profile
robfromaz1977
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 179
Location: Arizona's White Mountains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

So I should be able to use load data from most load manuals that are labeled safe only in Ruger and T/C firearms. Some load manuals say Blackhawk only and others say Ruger in general.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

robfromaz1977 wrote:
So I should be able to use load data from most load manuals that are labeled safe only in Ruger and T/C firearms. Some load manuals say Blackhawk only and others say Ruger in general.

Yes, sir. IMO. That's based on Redhawks I own in 45 Colt and 41 Mag and, of course, on just how crazy you wish to get. But, any listed load will work fine in Reds or Blacks.

I do disagree with my hero Linebaugh's assertion that the S&W N frames are as strong as the Blackhawk. I have seen S&Ws with blown top straps and cylinders in the Endurance Enhanced versions, admittedly with handloads however those same handloads, while stout, did nothing to a Freedom Arms or a Vaquero. Examples of one are always questionable, but, that's how we often form our opinions and why, by the way, I far, far prefer brunettes.
Back to top
View user's profile
robfromaz1977
Member
Member


Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 179
Location: Arizona's White Mountains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

This is great help. I am not one to see if I can get the last grain of powder stuffed in that is listed at the top of the load charts, just wanted a little more than the low pressure factory stuff. And knowing now that my Redhawk is plenty stout, I will feel safe with any load I choose to put in it. Thanks again for your experience.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:46 am    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

The Redhawk will handle any sane .44 load, including the 330 grain Hammerheads. This excerpt is from Garretts website:


GARRETT'S 44 MAG HAMMERHEAD AMMO
$85 / 50 CTGS

330-GR SUPER-HARD-CAST GC LONG-HAMMERHEAD AT 1400-FPS

THIS 44 MAGNUM AMMO IS RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN RUGER AND DAN WESSON DOUBLE-ACTION REVOLVERS, AS WELL AS THE TAURUS RAGING BULL. IT IS ALSO RECOMMENDED FOR THE GARY REEDER 5-SHOT ULTIMATE 44 MAGNUM, AND THE JOHN GALLAGHER CUSTOM LONG-CYLINDER RUGER SINGLE-ACTIONS. THIS AMMO SHOULD BE FIRED ONLY IN THOSE RECOMMENDED REVOLVERS! THIS AMMO IS BOTH TOO LONG AND GENERATES TOO MUCH CHAMBER PRESSURE FOR SAFE USE IN S&W AND RUGER SUPER BLACKHAWK REVOLVERS. IT IS ALSO TOO LONG FOR USE IN THE FREEDOM ARMS REVOLVER.

ENERGY: 1440 FT/LBS; TAYLOR KNOCKOUT VALUE: 28; MEPLAT: .320"; CHAMBER PRESSURE: 43,500-CUP; SECTIONAL DENSITY: .255; TRAJECTORY: +2" @ 50-YDS; ZERO @ 100-YDS; -7" @ 150-YDS


I had to send my Super Blackhawk back to Ruger because of a cracked forcing cone, looking at my Redhawk, I cant imagine that forcing cone cracking, it is twice as beefy as the Super Blackhawk. I am not bashing the Blackhawks, I love my custom 5" .44 Bisley.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe Boleo
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 25, 2006
Posts: 427
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:07 am    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

Interesting posts. I have Rugers and like them and for the money represent real value. Take care...
Joe
Back to top
View user's profile
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

roklok wrote:
The Redhawks are a stronger, beefier design than the Super Blackhawks. I own both, and like them both, but the redhawk is definitely heavier duty in factory form.

How's the weather in Fairbanks!? Referencing both of your posts on this thread, you believe the Redhawk is stronger than the Blackhawk. Is that based on the Hammerhead recommendation?

Stay warm.
Back to top
View user's profile
lesterg3
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Posts: 1248
Location: Dixie

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:43 am    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

To my dismay, I have only one Ruger. A Police Security Six manufactured around 1972 and chambered in .357 Mag, with a 4 1/2 inch barrel. I inherited from my Dad, who bought it new and never fired it.

Since then I have put about 50 rounds through it and I love it. It is superb in handling and the kick is negligible. I would like to upgrade the sights though. So if anyone has a suggestion it would be appreciated.

Hopefully one day I will be able to buy more Ruger revolvers, and will post my intent so I can hear from ya'll on which model and caliber I should acquire.

Thanks for extolling the virtues of the Ruger handguns.

_________________
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine. "--Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -- Thomas Jefferson

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."--James Madison

NRA Life Member
Vietnam War Vet 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3382
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post Reply with quote

lesterg3 wrote:
To my dismay, I have only one Ruger. A Police Security Six manufactured around 1972 and chambered in .357 Mag, with a 4 1/2 inch barrel. I inherited from my Dad, who bought it new and never fired it.

Since then I have put about 50 rounds through it and I love it. It is superb in handling and the kick is negligible. I would like to upgrade the sights though. So if anyone has a suggestion it would be appreciated.

Hopefully one day I will be able to buy more Ruger revolvers, and will post my intent so I can hear from ya'll on which model and caliber I should acquire.

Thanks for extolling the virtues of the Ruger handguns.

Lester,
I made my own sights for my Security-Six. The rear blade can be made from heavy banding strapping material and the front blade from some flat bar steel. I tuned my sights so the front blade would fill the rear notch when at arm's length for a beter sight picture.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

Handloader, my opinion is based on the Garrett 330 grain +P ammo info, in which he purposely made the OAL slightly too long to use in Super Blackhawk cylinders because he feels the Blackhawk is not up to those pressures. My opinion is also based on personal experience with the aforementioned cracked forcing cone on my Super Blackhawk. The barrel at the forcing cone area on the Redhawk is MUCH thicker, no comparison. The Redhawk also has a lot more beef in the cylinder walls. Of course, as you stated, the down side is weight. While I carry my Blackhawk on my belt, I find the Redhawk is too heavy for belt carry and carry it in a chest holster. I like them both immensely and would not want to give up either one. I carry my Redhawk loaded with the 330 grain Hammerheads with two speedloaders in this holster:

www.alaskasportsmanproducts.com/

The weather up here has been pretty moderate so far, although it did dip down to -40 about a month ago. Right now it is about -18. It will get colder through January and February.
Back to top
View user's profile
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Blathering about Rugers, I recommend skipping this post . . Reply with quote

Here is an interesting article comparing the Blackhawk and Redhawk:

www.beartoothbullets.c...otes.htm/5
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.