HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: Blacksmythx
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12632

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 130
BOT: 2
Total: 132
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Home
04: Forums
05: Photo Albums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Your Account
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Home
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Photo Albums
19: Photo Albums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: News
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Photo Albums
31: Forums
32: Photo Albums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Photo Albums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Photo Albums
41: Photo Albums
42: Photo Albums
43: Photo Albums
44: Home
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Photo Albums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Photo Albums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Photo Albums
73: Forums
74: Photo Albums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Home
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Home
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Home
88: Photo Albums
89: Forums
90: Photo Albums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Photo Albums
96: Photo Albums
97: Your Account
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Your Account
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Photo Albums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Home
117: Photo Albums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Photo Albums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Photo Albums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2362
  · Views: 460162
  · Votes: 1311
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Powder Accuracy
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rrogacki
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 22, 2006
Posts: 135
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 7:38 pm    Post subject: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

I am working up a new load for a .270, I was going to use RL22, but my local reloading supply shop owner tells me that IMR 4064 is the most versatile and accurate powder there is to use. I will be loading CCI 200 primers and Nosler BT 130's. What is the prevailing opinion on the accuracy of different powders, do you think one brand/type is better than another ?

Thank You All
Back to top
View user's profile MSN Messenger
roklok
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 8:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

I have never been able to say that one brand of propellant gives better accuracy than another across the board,maybe in a given rifle. I have always found bullet brand,weight and type,seating depth and charge weight more important to accuracy than propellant brand. But I am sure that there are people out there with more experience than me on this subject. I will say that I am very fond of Alliant's line of Reloder powders,I dont think you can go wrong with them.
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3557
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 8:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

H4895 is a real accurate powder too but it is not the best powder for the 270. Either is 4064! IMR4350, H4350, WW760 and H414 are all good powders for the 270. IMR4831 is one of the best in most rifles.
You will lose 200 FPS over the others and although that has nothing to do with accuracy it does have a lot to do with potential huntability. Either of the 4350 powders are capable of giving fine accuracy in most rifles and calibers that are recommended for them. H414 is my choive in the very similar 3006 because it gives near maximum velocity and sub MOA accuracy. the double base powders (760 and 414) meter so well through my powder measures that I use thrown charges.
You need to find a powder that is well suited to the size of your cartridge, meters to a level that you can tollerate, provides the velocity that you can be comfortable with, and gives you the accuracy that the rifle and you are capable of.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Flint54
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 09, 2005
Posts: 389
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Cool No one powder is the most accurate. Each one has it's purpose and may work for several cartridges. In addition each firearm has it's likes and dislikes. For quite a few years I have used the Nosler Reloading Manual and checked out what powder they list as their "Most Accurate Powder Tested". They list this for each and every cartridge. In addition Nosler also lists the "Load Density" for each load. This is a very usefull tool as I have most times found that a Load Density above 90% gives me the best accuracy in most of the cartridges/firearms that I use. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
skb2706
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 7:26 am    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Text language edited by moderator: popgun

Your local "reloading supply shop owner "doesn't know much about reloading". To even suggest that one powder is more accurate than another is rediculous. How could he possibly know this.........the amount of testing envolved to prove that would take several lifetimes.
Back to top
View user's profile
Bushmaster
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Posts: 10586
Location: Ava, Missouri

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 8:03 am    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Most rifle powders are of the slow burning kind. The acuracy of a given powder is dependent on your preference and attention to detail during the loading process. I doubt that a given powder has that much to do with acuracy I would probably put the responsibility of acurate loads on primer selection, case preperation, bullet selection and your skill at paying attention to detail. Except for the .30-30, my preference for .30 calibre rifle powder is H4831SC.

_________________
I have one nerve left and yer standin' on it...

DEMOCRACY Two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch...
LIBERTY A well armed sheep contesting the outcome of the vote...
Back to top
View user's profile
rrogacki
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 22, 2006
Posts: 135
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 9:37 am    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Thank you all. As usual everyone has been very helpful. The members of this site always have valuable input and it makes it easier to come to a decision which you know will be the right one. Thank you all again.

Live Long and Shoot Well
Back to top
View user's profile MSN Messenger
Arizona Hunter
Member
Member


Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Posts: 275

PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:11 am    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

When I started I went with Hodgdon, mainly because they claim their "Extreme" rifle powders have less velocity variation in heat or cold than the competion. Is it true? I don't know but I've been well pleased with H4350.
Back to top
View user's profile
popgun
Member
Member


Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Posts: 735
Location: Mitchell, GA, U.S.A. (2007 pop. 191)

PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Any of the powders in your reloading manual for the 270 can produce accuracy in the 270. In the Nosler manual and others you will see an "accuracy load" or "most accurate powder tested" listed in the tables. That powder is the place to start if available to you because the testers saw a lot of data to give it that designation. You will find that the 270 Win. is accurate with many powders and bullet combinations. The 270 is just one of those 'goodies' that are easy to load for. Work up a good 130 and 150 grain load and you will find that there is little difference in the point of impact of the two bullet weights. You might find for your eastern US hunting that the 150 gr bullets may perform better. But test them for yourself on game and pick the one you like.

_________________
Safe shooting,
Chris Young, aka: popgun, Moderator
I don't know everything but I have made most of the mistakes already and lived through many of them.


Last edited by popgun on Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Blaine
Member
Member


Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: 260
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Text language edited by moderator: popgun

In my experience, I'd say that IMR 4350 and H4350 are the most versatile powders. For the 270, although you can work up a fine load with 4350, it is not the best powder. IMR 4895, and IMR 7828 give me the best accuracy in my 270. As far as IMR 4064 being the most versatile, I'd say your shop owner doesn't know much. Very Happy

Blaine

_________________
Shoot straight and above all shoot SMART....and remember God is still in control !!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Handloader
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 1032
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Powder Accuracy Reply with quote

Observations:

Looking at a burn rate chart one notes over 100 different powders listed from fastest to slowest. There are single base and double base powders with different shapes. It is logical that some of these powders will be better suited to certain cartridges and bullet weights than others. Further, among those suited for a given cartridge, there will differences in how and when they develope their peak pressure. This will effect both velocity and accuracy. And, some powders will be better in both catagories than others.

Nosler helps with their manual by showing load density as well as velocity and the powder that was most accurate in their testing. If one studies a range of cartridges a pattern emerges. Powders with both high load density and the higher velocities will often be among the most accurate powder tested. That said, the most accurate powder varies often due to cartridge or bullet weight.

Carefully examining various load data in Nosler reveals that virtually all powders mentioned have their "most accurate" designation in some combination of bullet weight and caliber. Unless one is shooting benchrest, the minor differences in accuracy with appropriate powders is far less critical than other factors.

Extreme powders, such as H4350, have merit IMO if one hunts in varied temperatures. We chronographed H4350 in a 30-06 and 7X57 at O degrees and at 110 degrees, along with six other powders, and found the velocity variation notably to be the smallest, less than 40fps.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.