HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: RichardZ
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 13126

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 549
BOT: 1
Total: 550
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Your Account
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Photo Albums
06: Photo Albums
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Home
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Statistics
22: Forums
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Home
27: Forums
28: Home
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Your Account
38: Photo Albums
39: Forums
40: Photo Albums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Your Account
44: Your Account
45: Forums
46: Your Account
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Your Account
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Your Account
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Your Account
57: Forums
58: Your Account
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Your Account
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Your Account
73: Forums
74: Home
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Home
78: Forums
79: Photo Albums
80: Home
81: Home
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Home
85: Your Account
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Your Account
90: Photo Albums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Your Account
101: Forums
102: Photo Albums
103: Home
104: Forums
105: Your Account
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Your Account
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Home
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Home
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Your Account
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Home
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Your Account
135: Forums
136: Photo Albums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Home
140: Photo Albums
141: Your Account
142: Your Account
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Your Account
146: Forums
147: Photo Albums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Your Account
154: Forums
155: Home
156: Photo Albums
157: Home
158: Photo Albums
159: News
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Your Account
163: Forums
164: Home
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Your Account
171: Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Photo Albums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Home
179: Your Account
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Your Account
185: Your Account
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Photo Albums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Home
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Photo Albums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Home
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Photo Albums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Your Account
235: Home
236: Photo Albums
237: Your Account
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Your Account
241: Forums
242: Photo Albums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Home
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Your Account
255: Home
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Photo Albums
260: Your Account
261: Your Account
262: News
263: Home
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Your Account
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Forums
279: Photo Albums
280: Photo Albums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Home
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Forums
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Photo Albums
290: Forums
291: Your Account
292: Forums
293: Your Account
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Photo Albums
297: Forums
298: Photo Albums
299: Forums
300: Photo Albums
301: Forums
302: Your Account
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Forums
306: Forums
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Forums
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Forums
314: Home
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Home
321: Forums
322: Photo Albums
323: Forums
324: Forums
325: Your Account
326: Forums
327: Photo Albums
328: Forums
329: Your Account
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Your Account
334: Home
335: Forums
336: Your Account
337: Forums
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Your Account
342: Photo Albums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Your Account
348: Forums
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Your Account
352: Home
353: Forums
354: Home
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Forums
362: Forums
363: Forums
364: Forums
365: Forums
366: Forums
367: Forums
368: Forums
369: Forums
370: Forums
371: Home
372: Forums
373: Forums
374: Forums
375: Forums
376: Forums
377: Your Account
378: Your Account
379: Your Account
380: Forums
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Forums
384: Photo Albums
385: Your Account
386: Photo Albums
387: Forums
388: Forums
389: Forums
390: Forums
391: Your Account
392: Home
393: Forums
394: Forums
395: Forums
396: Forums
397: Forums
398: Forums
399: Forums
400: Your Account
401: Forums
402: Your Account
403: Photo Albums
404: Photo Albums
405: Forums
406: Forums
407: Forums
408: Forums
409: Your Account
410: Your Account
411: Forums
412: Forums
413: Forums
414: Forums
415: Your Account
416: Home
417: Forums
418: Photo Albums
419: Forums
420: Photo Albums
421: Forums
422: Forums
423: Your Account
424: Forums
425: Photo Albums
426: Your Account
427: Forums
428: Your Account
429: Forums
430: Forums
431: Forums
432: Photo Albums
433: Forums
434: Your Account
435: Your Account
436: Photo Albums
437: Forums
438: Forums
439: Forums
440: Forums
441: Forums
442: Forums
443: Photo Albums
444: Forums
445: Home
446: Your Account
447: Forums
448: Photo Albums
449: Photo Albums
450: Forums
451: Forums
452: Forums
453: Forums
454: Forums
455: Forums
456: Forums
457: Forums
458: Home
459: Forums
460: Forums
461: Photo Albums
462: Forums
463: Home
464: Forums
465: Photo Albums
466: Forums
467: Forums
468: Home
469: Forums
470: Forums
471: Forums
472: Forums
473: Forums
474: Forums
475: Forums
476: Home
477: Forums
478: Forums
479: Forums
480: Forums
481: Forums
482: Forums
483: Forums
484: Forums
485: Forums
486: Forums
487: Forums
488: Forums
489: Forums
490: Forums
491: Forums
492: Photo Albums
493: Forums
494: Forums
495: Forums
496: Forums
497: Forums
498: Forums
499: Forums
500: Forums
501: Forums
502: Your Account
503: Photo Albums
504: News
505: Forums
506: Forums
507: Forums
508: Your Account
509: Photo Albums
510: Home
511: Forums
512: Photo Albums
513: Forums
514: Forums
515: Forums
516: Forums
517: Forums
518: Forums
519: Forums
520: Photo Albums
521: Forums
522: Forums
523: Forums
524: Forums
525: Forums
526: Your Account
527: Your Account
528: Forums
529: Forums
530: Forums
531: Forums
532: Forums
533: Forums
534: Forums
535: Photo Albums
536: Forums
537: Your Account
538: Statistics
539: Forums
540: Your Account
541: Forums
542: Forums
543: Forums
544: Forums
545: Forums
546: Forums
547: Home
548: Forums
549: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 308
 Pictures: 2451
  · Views: 820725
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86
 

Recoil Reduction For Load Development
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:58 pm    Post subject: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Thoughts here on using recoil reducing "devices" while in the load development stage...

I am working on loads for the 300 Win Mag. The last time I had it to the range, I started to notice the recoil after about 30 rounds and thought that I should have used something like Caldwell's Lead Sled. After some online research, I found several instances where folks have claimed that the use of such devices has resulted in broken stocks, scopes out of alignment or damaged, etc.

I would only use something like this for load development. Once I have a that part of the equation worked out, any practice, scope adjustments, final sighting adjustments would be with the rifle fired from the shoulder.

As before, Thanks in advance for any insights...

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

ok..... personally Ive been there and done that with the flinch after range session....20 or so rounds from lightweight rifle had me physically unable to squeeze heavy trigger....... all in my head but thats how it was.

a great pity you arent allowed to use a suppressor...what about a muzzle brake????

a limbsaver would help a great deal and would be permanent assistance.
Nathan Fosters book series is well worth the $$$$$ to get a hold of it. it will help teach you to "handle the jandle"
basically you need to "suck it up buttercup",accept what is coming,get a firm grip of your self and by utalising proper hold techniques still shoot a good group.
first off ditch the bipod and the hugyourself technique and get a good grip of the forend...

why 30 rounds at a time????
thats 10 lots of 3 shot groups..... far more than enough to do ladder test ...and far more than enough to do seating dept tests....
thats my 2cent worth..I will try to post link to article that should help.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

www.ballisticstudies.c...orend.html

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Vince
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 15704
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:40 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

It's not the first time I've heard of this problem HJ, and I've seen pics of split stocks allegedly split whilst using a Lead Sled. Personally, I've never tried the Lead Sled, but when you stop and think about it, something has to absorb the recoil. If the rest isn't moving because of a heavy load of lead shot, then where does the recoil go, what absorbs the recoil? There is really only one place and that's the stock, within a little going to the recoil pad.

I am lucky in that the heaviest recoiling guns I have are really only mild to medium in that department....223, 30.30, .243, 12g and 20g, with the 20g being the most vicious when loaded with slugs.

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1065
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:54 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Popcorn

Watching this with interest as I have a light weight Rem. 700 .300 Win Mag to get a load worked up for.

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8314
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:57 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
a limbsaver would help a great deal and would be permanent assistance.

If you don't have a LimbSaver recoil pad on your stock, this should be the first thing you try. It makes a word of difference.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8314
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:06 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
why 30 rounds at a time????

That is another great question. It may take multiple shots to verify if a load is a good one. But I can tell on the second shot if the load is bad. The that second bullet isn't a kissing cousin with the first, I'm not interested in putting anymore precious metal downrange with that load-bullet combination. Thus, I stop wasting bullets, powder, and time and now do my load development with single round per charge load development ladders. I'm often in the field hunting with a 1 moa load and my scope sighted in after 8 shots. If you know your rifle is capable of 1 moa or better, it works about 75% of the time for me. I load 0.5 grain increments, fire a single round per charge, and track the impact points. When I find 3 consecutive shots that group 1 moa or better, I know the middle one is my accuracy node. I adjust my scope to that impact point. If I have time to go to the range, I'll shoot a 3- to 5-shot group the next time out to verify. Otherwise I can be in the field hunting the next day.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
Elvis wrote:
a limbsaver would help a great deal and would be permanent assistance.

If you don't have a LimbSaver recoil pad on your stock, this should be the first thing you try. It makes a word of difference.

The rifle in question is a Kimber. It has a 1" Pachmayr Decelerator factory installed.

www.kimberamerica.com/...lect-grade

www.pachmayr.com/home/...t-pads.php

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
Elvis wrote:
why 30 rounds at a time????

That is another great question. It may take multiple shots to verify if a load is a good one. But I can tell on the second shot if the load is bad. The that second bullet isn't a kissing cousin with the first, I'm not interested in putting anymore precious metal downrange with that load-bullet combination. Thus, I stop wasting bullets, powder, and time and now do my load development with single round per charge load development ladders. I'm often in the field hunting with a 1 moa load and my scope sighted in after 8 shots. If you know your rifle is capable of 1 moa or better, it works about 75% of the time for me. I load 0.5 grain increments, fire a single round per charge, and track the impact points. When I find 3 consecutive shots that group 1 moa or better, I know the middle one is my accuracy node. I adjust my scope to that impact point. If I have time to go to the range, I'll shoot a 3- to 5-shot group the next time out to verify. Otherwise I can be in the field hunting the next day.

Maybe I should clarify. The last time I had the rifle to the range was the FIRST time I had it to the range. I needed to get some rounds through it to break in the barrel, get it sighted in and check factory ammo, since I haven't had time to develop handloads until now. I ended up doing all that the day before opening day of the general rifle season. In between all that, I had the wife there practicing some more with the .308, so it was a pretty busy afternoon.

Will I need to fire 30 or more rounds in a single range session again? I don't know for sure, but my thought was if I can reduce as much human error as possible while in the load development stage, it might be worth it.

Right now I have some rounds ready to test with 180 grain Nosler Partitions and just picked up a box of Hornady 200 grain ELD-X, so I could see where an extended range session could be possible.

I work up my loads in a similar fashion, but still shoot 3 shot groups at different targets looking for the 3 groups that are closest to the same POI, using the "middle" group as the "sweet spot" I had never given thought to just firing one round from each powder graduation and using that.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.


Last edited by hunterjoe21 on Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Vince wrote:


I am lucky in that the heaviest recoiling guns I have are really only mild to medium in that department....223, 30.30, .243, 12g and 20g, with the 20g being the most vicious when loaded with slugs.

Vince,

This is the first magnum chambering I have attempted to work up a load for. I dumped my old Mossberg 12 ga slug gun when I started having some problems with my shoulder. .222, .223, .22-250, .243 and .308 were pretty much all I worked with, other than the shotguns. I still have a Bennelli Nova in 12 ga that is brutal with 3.5" turkey loads off the bench, although I've never felt anything while firing at a turkey.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

ok that surely clears things up somewhat....
youv'e just mentioned a previous shoulder injury...now in my mind that will be on your mind and will be all the more reason to be cautious to not develop a flinch .
try shooting a .12ga from prone position if you want "felt recoil" ........never again, I used to comando crawl up on parrie ducks then blast as they took off.....talk about boot with a full power load and light single barrel.
I find wearing a decent thickness coat helps a lot as it sort of spreads the thump.
would it be rude to ask why a .300 mag ???? longer range and more punch than the .308???
you said that you never feel recoil when shooting turkey..Mate that I can relate to as its the same for me.
maybe get the 180 grn partition load sorted and then sort out a lighter recoiling 150grn load that will still hit like hammer of Thor but wont knock you into next week, that way you can get used to the rifle and find your groove with it and keep full power loads for the occasions they are needed.
heck you could even go down to a 130grn barnes type and it would be as mild as .308 but with blistering pace and whallop.
just had a thought...the partitions are supposed to work better not so hot......as in better at .308 velocities than 300 WM where they have been known to do weird things like end about and total core loss.... so maybe a milder load somewhere inbetween might be a good option, from the little Ive seen of them (2 deer with 150s in 270) they are awesome.
I surely hope my ramblings help and are taken in the spirit they are given.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 8314
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 3:33 am    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

The Partition has two lead cores. The one in the front of the bullet with likely be shed from the copper jacket and fragment. The lead-core in the back of the bullet (you can see it when you look at the tail of a partition) is typically retained to promote penetration. the bullet could easily come apart with the kinetic energy of a .300 Win Mag. I've tested Remington Core-Lokts from a 300 WM and the bullet completely disintegrated. When I test .308 monolithic bullets, I have to use the 300 WM to get enough energy to drive them to the bottom of their expansion cavity and get full expansion. The 130 Barnes TTSX is lighter shooting, accurate, but it looses most of its oomph by 250 yards.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:

try shooting a .12ga from prone position if you want "felt recoil" ........never again, I used to comando crawl up on parrie ducks then blast as they took off.....talk about boot with a full power load and light single barrel.
I find wearing a decent thickness coat helps a lot as it sort of spreads the thump.
would it be rude to ask why a .300 mag ?

I was hunting turkeys with my brother in law one day. We were sitting against the same tree, with him to my right and doing the calling. We had a pretty good Tom come in, but couldn't get him to commit to the decoy. I told him to go ahead and take the shot, but the dumb-azz didn't remember to put a round in the chamber before this point. When his firing pin dropped on an empty chamber, I handed him my Benelli, by this time, the bird had moved even farther to our right. By the time he pulled the trigger, he had his right shoulder against the tree, pinched between the stock and a solid, immovable object. I've never seen anyone bruise up from 1 shot like he did. Learned a serious lesson that day.

Why a .300 Win Mag?

It is a caliber I've always been intrigued by. I've always wanted one, and when I was invited to an elk hunt a few years ago, I jumped at the chance to add on to the gun safe. That particular hunt didn't work out, but now that I've relocated to the western part of the US, it seems to be appropriate.

I know I have a learning curve with it, especially having only used "medium action" calibers in the past, but am confident I can master it with practice. The first/last range session ended with a 1.25 inch 100 yard group with factory ammo, even after all the rounds down range.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
hunterjoe21
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Miles City, Montana

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 9:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
The Partition has two lead cores. The one in the front of the bullet with likely be shed from the copper jacket and fragment. The lead-core in the back of the bullet (you can see it when you look at the tail of a partition) is typically retained to promote penetration. the bullet could easily come apart with the kinetic energy of a .300 Win Mag. I've tested Remington Core-Lokts from a 300 WM and the bullet completely disintegrated. When I test .308 monolithic bullets, I have to use the 300 WM to get enough energy to drive them to the bottom of their expansion cavity and get full expansion. The 130 Barnes TTSX is lighter shooting, accurate, but it looses most of its oomph by 250 yards.

My original intent was to work up a load using a Barnes 165 gr TTSX. They seem to be almost impossible to find though. No one around here stocks them (168 grain TSX's are everywhere), but I remember reading somewhere that the 165 TTSX/TSX was developed with the .300 Win Mag in mind.

_________________
My 1911 is more effective than your 911.
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 9239
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Recoil Reduction For Load Development Reply with quote

ouch ouch ouch ..your brother was lucky he didnt bust a collar bone or something.

what range/distance to you intend to be shooting to???
that will give you two parts of your equation the other being "elk sized"
1.25" is not to be sneezed at..thats a fine 3-400yard kill shot in anyones book.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by *Dizfunkshunal* :.