HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: AR-10
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12730

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 371
BOT: 1
Total: 372
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Photo Albums
04: Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: News
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Your Account
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Your Account
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Home
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Your Account
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Photo Albums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Your Account
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Your Account
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Home
93: Your Account
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Photo Albums
97: Home
98: Forums
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Members List
102: News
103: Forums
104: Home
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Home
109: Photo Albums
110: Your Account
111: Your Account
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Photo Albums
117: Your Account
118: Forums
119: Your Account
120: Your Account
121: Forums
122: Your Account
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Your Account
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Home
135: Forums
136: Photo Albums
137: Forums
138: Your Account
139: Home
140: Forums
141: Forums
142: Photo Albums
143: Home
144: Your Account
145: Forums
146: Your Account
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Home
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Home
183: Forums
184: Photo Albums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Home
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Home
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Forums
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Forums
242: Forums
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Your Account
246: Forums
247: Forums
248: Forums
249: Forums
250: Home
251: Forums
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Your Account
255: Forums
256: Home
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: News
260: Home
261: Forums
262: Forums
263: Home
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Forums
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Home
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Forums
287: Forums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Forums
291: Forums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Forums
299: Forums
300: Forums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Home
306: Photo Albums
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Your Account
311: Forums
312: Forums
313: Home
314: Forums
315: Forums
316: Photo Albums
317: Home
318: Forums
319: Home
320: Photo Albums
321: Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Forums
327: Forums
328: Home
329: Home
330: Forums
331: Forums
332: Forums
333: Forums
334: Forums
335: Your Account
336: Forums
337: Forums
338: Photo Albums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Home
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Forums
345: Forums
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Your Account
349: Forums
350: Forums
351: Forums
352: Forums
353: Forums
354: Forums
355: Forums
356: Forums
357: Forums
358: Forums
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Forums
362: Forums
363: Your Account
364: Your Account
365: Home
366: Photo Albums
367: Forums
368: Forums
369: Forums
370: Forums
371: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2378
  · Views: 561171
  · Votes: 1312
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

What Defines Bullet Expansion?
Big Game Hunting topics that dont fit other categories
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Big Game Hunting

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:53 pm    Post subject: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

An analysis of all-copper, monolithic bullet performance.

I have been conducting terminal performance tests with quite a few .277 bullets for the 6.8mm SPC as well as the .270 Win. I’m hunting with the 6.8mm most of the time but still use the .270 Win when I need more reach and for elk. The minimum velocity required for bullet expansion is an important factor for me when choosing a bullet for the 6.8 to use out to 300 yards or the .270 out to 500 yards (there are plenty of shot opportunities at these ranges in Texas and New Mexico if you practice for it). A hunting bullet still needs to expand at these longer ranges in order to transfer their energy and not over-penetrate. Here is a collective picture showing all of the monolithic 6.8 bullets tested. The 85gr TSX has not tested yet at 300 yards because the bullet has exhibited limited expansion and over penetration at 200 yards.



six8 monolithic copper bullet comparison.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  385.07 KB
 Viewed:  15040 Time(s)

six8 monolithic copper bullet comparison.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:48 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:54 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Here is a graph comparing their velocities, momentum, and kinetic energy. Average muzzle velocities, BCs, and bullet lengths are below and shot from an 18” barrel with a 6.8mm SPC II chamber.

85gr Nosler E-Tip - 2860 fps (31.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.273] 0.982”
85gr Barnes TSX - 2920 fps (32.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.246] 0.886”
95gr Barnes TTSX - 2850 fps (30.5gr AA2200) [BC 0.292] 1.035”
110gr Barnes TSX - 2740 fps (28.6gr AA2200) [BC 0.323] 1.082”

Caution - these loads worked in my rifles but this is no guarantee that they will work safely in yours.



velocity vs energy vs momentum 1000.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  207.27 KB
 Viewed:  15038 Time(s)

velocity vs energy vs momentum 1000.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:48 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:07 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Minimum Opening Velocity

Manufacturers typically advertise a minimum velocity at which a bullet type will open up or mushroom. I have found that bullet velocity is not a consistent parameter in determining when a bullet starts to open up, e.g., the Barnes 110gr TSX opens up and has greater expansion at lower velocities than the 85gr TSX even though they both have the same expansion cavity design with an advertised 2100 fps minimum velocity for expansion. To better understand what is occurring on impact, bullet expansion was charted with respect to velocity, momentum, and then kinetic energy to see if there was any correlation of data. When charting bullet expansion compared to velocity and momentum, there was no correlation. When expansion was charted with respect to the bullet’s kinetic energy, there was positive correlation and the 85gr and 110gr TSX matched each other. As seen in the charts below, expansion of monolithic copper bullets is determined by the bullet’s kinetic energy on impact not velocity, e.g., heavier bullets at lower speeds can out expand lighter bullets of the same caliber at faster speeds. This now seems obvious after looking at the data – work has to be expended to peel open and fold back the pedals of a solid copper bullet. Work is energy (1/2 mass * velocity ^2).

Instead of one chart showing all the compiled data up front, 3 charts are used to best show the data and build on the observations. Below is the first chart completed which compares just .277 Barnes TSX bullets. 6.8 tests were conducted at 100, 200, and 300 yards. Bullet tests with the .270 Win were at 100, 300, and 500 yards. This has been an enlightening exercise and shows why the 85gr TSX has a limited range. Note, the 85gr TSX was tested twice with two different powder weights during load development.

From 6.8mm SPC II
85gr Barnes TSX - 2815 fps (31.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.246]
85gr Barnes TSX - 2920 fps (32.0gr AA2200) [BC 0. 246]
110gr Barnes TSX - 2740 fps (28.6gr AA2200) [BC 0.323]

From .270 Win
110gr Barnes TSX - 3375 fps (60.0gr IMR4350) [BC 0.323]
130gr Barnes TSX – 3070 fps (56.0gr IMR4350) [BC 0.432]

Caution - these loads worked in my rifles but this is no guarantee that they will work safely in yours.



bullet energy controls tsx expansion.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  143.71 KB
 Viewed:  15073 Time(s)

bullet energy controls tsx expansion.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:50 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:08 pm    Post subject: Observations Regarding Barnes TSX Bullet Expansion Reply with quote

Observations Regarding Barnes TSX Bullet Expansion

o The 85gr and 110gr TSX are designed for the 6.8mm and the 130gr TSX for the .270. Note that the 130gr expansion curve parallels the 85gr/110gr TSX but the 130gr TSX needs about 40% more kinetic energy for the same expansion.

o As seen in the collective picture above, the 110gr TSX fired from a 6.8 with an impact energy of 1500 ft-lbs (100 yards) has expanded to the bottom of the expansion cavity. When fired from a .270 Win (2300 ft-lbs at 100 yards), the bullet expands well beyond the bottom of the expansion cavity. Just over 0.6” seems to be the practical expansion limits of Barnes .277 all-copper bullets. If you want more expansion, you will need to go to a larger caliber.

o To achieve a minimal expansion of 0.4”, at least 800 ft-lbs of energy is required for 6.8mm-designed TSX bullets. The 85gr TSX achieves this around 200 yards while the 110gr TSX will have the same expansion around 300 yards. The 85gr TSX has a higher muzzle velocity but its low BC [0.246] causes the bullet to decelerate more rapidly resulting in less energy and reduced expansion.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:26 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:14 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Newly Designed 6.8mm Bullets with Ballistic Tips.

The chart below has the test data add for the Nosler 85gr E-Tip and Barnes 95gr TTSX which are tipped 6.8mm bullets designed specifically to open up at lower velocities.

85gr Nosler E-Tip – 2845 fps (31.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.273]
95gr Barnes TTSX - 2890 fps (30.5gr AA2200) [BC 0.296]

Caution - these loads worked in my rifles but this is no guarantee that they will work safely in yours.



bullet energy vs expansion.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  123.02 KB
 Viewed:  15062 Time(s)

bullet energy vs expansion.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:15 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Observations Regarding 6.8mm Monolithic Tipped Bullet Expansion

o Both bullets out expand the TSX bullets at lower velocities and energy states . A point for consideration - the data suggests that expansion will occur at energy levels below 700 lb-ft (beyond 300 yards) which is less energy than what many recommend to humanly harvest deer.

o The Nosler 85gr E-Tip out-expanded the Barnes bullets below 1200 ft-lbs of energy and particularly the 85gr TSX at ranges greater than 100 yards. The E-Tip’s expansion advantage is achieved even though the E-Tip’s copper-zinc alloy is harder than the Barnes’ pure copper bullets. This has to be due to the E-Tip’s massive expansion cavity hidden behind its ballistic tip. Below is a cross-section of .277 monolithic bullets. The 85gr E-Tip and 95gr TTSX have the largest expansion cavities. The amount of expansion the TSX bullets achieve is impressive for their small cavity size.



o The 85gr E-Tip did not expand to the bottom of its expansion cavity in any of the 6.8 tests indicating that it can still expand further if shot with higher energy levels, i.e., it still should perform well if you launch it from a .270 Win. This would be a great round for a youngster

o The 95gr TTSX does hold an energy advantage over the 85gr E-Tip that equates to about 75 yards.

o The 95gr TTSX does expand better than the TSX bullets at lower energy states until the expansion becomes full-bodied, e.g., when the copper web emerges between its four pedals. Then the data suggest its expansion is similar to Barnes’ 6.8mm TSX bullets. Note in the picture above that the 95gr TTSX expanded to the bottom of its expansion shot from a 6.8 at 100 yards.

o A small point. Two 95gr TTSX bullets were tested and recovered at 300 yards. The bullet that expanded above 0.5” at 300 yards (850 ft-lbs, dotted-line) was that wide because two of the four pedals did not fold back along the bullet’s body like the other recovered TTSX bullets. When expansion was measured across the other two pedals, it was similar to the other bullet recovered at 300 yards that expanded to 0.456”.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:17 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Monolithic Bullets for the .270

Here is the charted data with the Barnes 129gr LRX, Hornady 130gr GMX, and Nosler 130gr E-Tip added. All were fired from a .270 Win. They were tested at 100, 300, and 500 yards. Note, the E-Tip not tested yet at 500 yards and I just started load development and am working up.

129gr Barnes LRX – 3100 fps (56.0gr IMR4350) [BC 0.463]
130gr Barnes TSX – 3070 fps (56.0gr IMR4350) [BC 0.432]
130gr Hornady GMX – 3080 fps (55.5gr IMR4350) [BC 0.453]
130gr Nosler E-Tip – 2990 fps (54.0gr IMR4350) [BC 0.459]

Caution - these loads worked in my rifles but this is no guarantee that they will work safely in yours.



e-tip and gmx expansion.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  142.08 KB
 Viewed:  15053 Time(s)

e-tip and gmx expansion.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 2:18 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Observations Regarding .270 Monolithic Bullets Expansion

o All three bullets are designed to expand at energy levels greater than those achievable in a six8. Thus, if fired from a six8, they would not expand as well resulting in limited or no expansion and over-penetration. This has been the typical result with several other .277 bullets that are designed for the velocities in the .270 Win range, e.g., Hornady 110gr HP, Barnes 110gr TTSX, and Berger 130gr and 140gr VLDs. These bullets are still good for target shooting in the six8 but don’t expect consistent or effective results if they are used for hunting.

o The softer copper Barnes 129gr LRX and 130gr TSX expanded to larger diameters at higher energy states than the tipped 130gr GMX and E-Tip bullets which are made from a harder 95% copper, 5% zinc alloy.

o The LRX provided superior expansion achieving the largest expansion of any .277 monolithic bullet tested, 0.611” well over doubling its size. To test the LRX’s advertised minimum opening “velocity” of 1600, testing would have to occur out to 800 yards (800 ft-lbs) or I need to develop a light load. Note, if shot with a lower muzzle velocity, the bullet’s stability will be less which may have a negative effect due to its length. Pictures of the recovered LRX and TSX bullets can be seen at this link.



o A GMX recovered after over 30 inches of penetration in a cow elk compared well with GMX bullets recovered from the bullet trap. This was a 400 yard shot at 8500’ MSL which was 200 fps faster on impact than if the bullet was shot at sea level. This resulted in higher impact energy similar to a 300-yard impact.



o I had planned to test modified 130gr E-Tips in a six8 with the assumption its expansion would provide similar results as the 85gr E-Tip. However, this data suggests the 130gr E-Tip performance will be disappointing at the lower velocities achieved with heavier bullets in a six8.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
gelandangan
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 07, 2006
Posts: 6005
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 4:25 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Slim buddy, awesome study as this should be written as an article.

_________________
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
A smile is the shortest distance between two people.

The government I trust .. is my .45-70 Government.

Do - Not try!


gelandangan.weebly.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Thanks, gelandangan. I should have thought of doing an article but there are a couple of disadvantages the biggest one being when the site software gets updated, the articles get dumped and have to be resubmitted.

I need to do analysis for lead-core bullets that expand but I don't think the data will correlate as nicely. Also, I've also come to the conclusion that the kinetic energy that determines penetration is not the bullet's weight on impact but its retained weight. I just recovered a 150gr bullet with a retain weight of 55gr that only penetrated as far as my .223 hunting bullets. It's hard to beat the monolithic bullets for expansion and penetration.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7956
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:11 am    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

great info as always slim.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:15 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Lead-Core Bullet Expansion

Gelandangan got me motivated to see if expansion of lead-core bullets like the AccuBond and Fusion MSR/GD would hold true to the paradigm that energy defines how much they will expand. At first the data didn’t make much sense. I have always recorded maximum expansion of the recovered bullet. The monolithic bullets are very symmetrical but that is not the case with the lead-core bullets, especially the Federal Fusion family. When I averaged bullet expansion based on the widest and narrowest side of the mushroom, the data correlated surprisingly well. So I have added a 4th chart with the Nosler 100gr and 110gr AccuBonds (gray) and the Federal Fusion 90gr Gold Dot, 115gr MSR, and 120gr MSR (purple). I did it slightly different and kept the bullet family a like color and labeled the specific bullet on the chart. Yes, the chart is a bit cluttered but it is worth a peek.

90gr Federal Gold Dot - 2915 fps (Factory) [BC 0.236]
100gr Nosler AccuBond - 2700 fps (30.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.323]
110gr Nosler AccuBond - 2600 fps (29.0gr AA2200) [BC 0.370]
115gr Federal Fusion MSR - 2490 fps (Factory) [BC 0. 378]
120gr Federal Fusion MSR - 2550 fps (27.5gr AA2200) [BC 0.400] COAL 2.350”

Caution - this load worked in my rifle but this is no guarantee that it will work safely in yours.



ab and fusion expansion.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  145.45 KB
 Viewed:  15000 Time(s)

ab and fusion expansion.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:22 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

Observations Regarding 6.8mm Lead-Core Bullets Expansion

o The 100gr AccuBond always hit harder inside 200 yards. Now we know its design is slightly different than the 110gr AB and the 100gr expands more at the higher energy levels. Both bullets expand the same at lower energy levels.

Here is a "group" picture of the AccuBonds showing terminal performance.



accubond vs fusion.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  243.64 KB
 Viewed:  14977 Time(s)

accubond vs fusion.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7916
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:28 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

o The Federal Fusion bullets may have similar lead-cores and construction but they all perform differently. I would guess their nose shape and copper jacket design are responsible for the difference.

o The Federal 115gr MSR expansion is very similar to the Barnes TSX but has the potential for great expansion at higher energy levels. It will be interesting to see this bullet’s performance when it is available as a component for handloaders.

o The Federal 90gr Gold Dot’s expansion is very similar to the 85gr E-Tip just slightly larger. I think their curves would match better except the Gold Dot recovered at 200 yards had one of its 5 pedals that didn’t fold back. The 90gr GD’s expansion is well controlled, does not shrink much as energy decreases, and is well matched for the 6.8mm SPC.

All the Fusion MSR/GD terminal performance results can be seen in this image.



6.8 bullet performance comparison fusion 100 200 300 yards.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  285.16 KB
 Viewed:  14969 Time(s)

6.8 bullet performance comparison fusion 100 200 300 yards.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7956
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: What Defines Bullet Expansion? Reply with quote

those fusions look good to me,sure have made a mess of themselves.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Big Game Hunting
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.