HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: Hennie
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12625

People Online:
Members: 1
Visitors: 298
BOT: 2
Total: 301
Who Is Where:
 Members:
01: RobertJ > Reloading Database
 Visitors:
01: Photo Albums
02: Forums
03: Your Account
04: Photo Albums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Photo Albums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Photo Albums
23: Photo Albums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Your Account
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Home
37: Forums
38: Photo Albums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Your Account
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Your Account
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Photo Albums
51: Forums
52: Photo Albums
53: Your Account
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Your Account
60: Forums
61: Your Account
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Photo Albums
80: Forums
81: Your Account
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Your Account
86: Your Account
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Your Account
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Your Account
97: Photo Albums
98: Photo Albums
99: Forums
100: Your Account
101: Photo Albums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Your Account
108: Your Account
109: Forums
110: Home
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Photo Albums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Your Account
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Photo Albums
125: Forums
126: Photo Albums
127: Your Account
128: Forums
129: Your Account
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Home
141: Forums
142: Home
143: Forums
144: Photo Albums
145: Forums
146: Your Account
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Photo Albums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Your Account
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Home
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Your Account
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Your Account
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Photo Albums
188: Forums
189: Your Account
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: News
197: Your Account
198: Forums
199: Your Account
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Photo Albums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Photo Albums
215: Forums
216: Your Account
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Forums
221: Forums
222: Photo Albums
223: Forums
224: Home
225: Forums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Home
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Forums
234: Forums
235: Photo Albums
236: Forums
237: Your Account
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Forums
241: Your Account
242: Forums
243: Photo Albums
244: Forums
245: Your Account
246: Photo Albums
247: Forums
248: Photo Albums
249: Forums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Your Account
253: Forums
254: Forums
255: Photo Albums
256: Forums
257: Forums
258: Forums
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Photo Albums
263: Your Account
264: Forums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Your Account
268: Forums
269: Forums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Forums
274: Forums
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Forums
278: Forums
279: Your Account
280: Home
281: Forums
282: Forums
283: Your Account
284: Forums
285: Forums
286: Forums
287: Home
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Photo Albums
291: Forums
292: Forums
293: Forums
294: Forums
295: Forums
296: Your Account
297: Forums
298: Home
  BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2362
  · Views: 452942
  · Votes: 1310
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

.300 Win Mag or WSM?
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7571
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:45 am    Post subject: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

I have a friend that is getting ready to buy a rifle. He asked me what I thought of the .308 or .30-06. My answer to him was a question - What do you want to do with it? He explained he was interested in hunting with a 180gr bullet beyond 300 yards. I told him the .30-06 would be about 100fps better than the .308 with the heavier bullets but he out to consider a .300 Win Mag or WSM at those distances and provided him with some ballistic comparison. He did some more research and told me he agrees.

My question for the forum is which one would you choose, .300 Win Mag or .300 WSM and why?

One advantage of the WSM - it appears to be more efficient with the powder (fps/grain of powder).

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 971
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 4:52 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:

One advantage of the WSM - it appears to be more efficient with the powder (fps/grain of powder).

I agree. Ballistics-wise, there isn't enough difference between the two to matter. Whatever you hit with either isn't going to notice the difference! If I had to make the choice, I would lean heavily towards the WSM simply because of what you note...its efficiency.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Grumulkin
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 365
Location: Central Ohio

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 5:12 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

If you're buying loaded ammo, it probably doesn't matter. If you're a reloader, then you'll probably find 300 Win. Mag. brass is a bit more available and cheaper so that's why I'd go with that cartridge.

That said, if I ever got the bolt action handgun with the shorter action I've been lusting over for some time, the cartridge I'd choose would be the 300 WSM.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 971
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 5:44 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Brass issue may well be a good point, as you mentioned. Assuming a person can lay in a supply, reloading is where you would see a marked advantage to the WSM.

As an example:

.300 Winchester Magnum – 180-grain bullet 2,918 fps w/ 67 grains of H4350
.300 WSM - 180-grain bullet 2,950 fps w/ 64 grains of H4350

Granted that this only represents one powder and others may react differently, the above represents a reasonable increase in the efficient use of the load.

Final decisions may all boil down to what rifle of preference is available in the various chamberings too.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4491
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 6:32 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

You could throw the .300 RCM in the mix and then just pick the rifle he likes best. Looks like you could just flip a coin on the cartridges.

"The most recent short magnum cartridges, as of this writing, are the .300 and .338 Ruger Compact Magnums (RCM). These .308 length offerings, developed by Hornady for Ruger, are based on shortened .375 Ruger case. This is a beltless bottleneck case with a rim and head diameter of .532". The RCM's were introduced in 2008.

Hornady offers .300 RCM factory loads with 150, 165 and 180 grain bullets; 200 and 225 grain bullets are offered in the .338 RCM. The performance of the .300 RCM is comparable to that of the other .300 short magnums, while the .338 RCM--a true medium bore cartridge--is comparable to the .350 Rem. Mag. and superior to the .325 WSM.

Note that these RCM cartridges are not rebated rim designs. This means that they offer improved feeding reliability compared to the WSM and SAUM short magnums. As such, they (along with the 6.5mm and .350 Rem. Mags.) are the best designed and most reliable of the short magnum cartridges."

www.chuckhawks.com/sho...agnums.htm

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Bushmaster
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Posts: 10574
Location: Ava, Missouri

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 7:44 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Considering the recoil factor, cost, variety and availability of components. That fact that there really isn't that much difference between the .300 Win Mag and the .30-06 (a few hundred fps). I'd still go with the .30-06. At 300 yards and the 180 grain bullet [of choice] still hurts whatever it hits.

_________________
I have one nerve left and yer standin' on it...

DEMOCRACY Two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch...
LIBERTY A well armed sheep contesting the outcome of the vote...
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:53 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Bushmaster wrote:
Considering the recoil factor, cost, variety and availability of components. That fact that there really isn't that much difference between the .300 Win Mag and the .30-06 (a few hundred fps). I'd still go with the .30-06. At 300 yards and the 180 grain bullet [of choice] still hurts whatever it hits.

I agree completely, 30/06 is the way to go.

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3551
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:23 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

I would ask what critters this guy is going to be shooting at 300 yards with that 180 grain bullet. If he is going after big bears, moose or elk then I might undrstand the desire to use the magnums but for anything smaller than a moose or grizzley then the 3006 is going to be more than enough to kill cleanly if he hits it in the right spot. If he needs more cartridge than the 3006 then I would opt for the 338 mag. It is common enough - the military is using it for sniper rifles - that you can get it in more places than the shot mags.
The amount of powder being used is a small part of the hunting load and a small price to pay for the success of a hunting trip. "Efficient" cartridges use much higher pressure to get their velocities and that is hard on the gun, shooter's ears and shoulder. It is hard to beat the old '06 when it comes to a big game cartridge.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7571
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 4:14 pm    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Thanks for all the inputs. I knew this topic would spark interest. He wants to hunt elk with a capability to go beyond 300 yards out to 500 yards. For bullets that are solid enough for penetration and still expand effectively, my research shows they need to be going 1800 to 2000 fps. A .30-06 won't have that much steam with a 180gr bullet at 500 yards. I suggested he could load the .300 WSM on the low side of the recommended loads and have just a bit more than the .30-06 with the option to load higher for longer reach. Here is some of the load data I shared with him.

.308 Win

168gr TTSX Varget 41.0gr 2475fps up to 45.5gr 2712fps 101% case capacity
180gr TTSX H4895 38.0gr 2325fps up to 42.0gr 2566fps 97%
180gr TTSX AA2520 44.0gr 2484fps up to 47.5gr 2669fps 98%

.30-06
168gr TTSX IMR 4064 46.5gr 2594fps up to 50.0gr 2801fps 95%
180gr TTSX IMR 4064 44.5gr 2464fos up to 48.0gr 2639fps 94%
180gr TTSX Big Game 49.0gr 2513fps up to 54.0gr 2742fps 98%

.300 Win Mag
168gr TTSX IMR 4831 67.0gr 2921fps up to 73.0gr 3140fps 98%
180gr TTSX IMR 4831 65.0gr 2784fps up to 71.0gr 2995fps 97%

.300 WSM
168gr TTSX Win 760 60.5gr 2898fps up to 65.0gr 3101fps 89%
180gr TTSX RL 19 62.5gr 2771fps up to 69.5gr 3036fps 107%

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:39 pm    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Load data taken from 6th (1972 edition) of handloaders digest for the 30/06/.



30-06_loads3.jpeg
 Description:
 Filesize:  24.16 KB
 Viewed:  7346 Time(s)

30-06_loads3.jpeg


30-06_loads2.jpeg
 Description:
 Filesize:  31.74 KB
 Viewed:  7346 Time(s)

30-06_loads2.jpeg


30-06_loads1.jpeg
 Description:
 Filesize:  34.02 KB
 Viewed:  7346 Time(s)

30-06_loads1.jpeg


_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7545
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 11:49 pm    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

yip I throw my hat in the 30/06 ring too!!!
if the 180 doesnt seen to have the legs to get out to 500yrds have a long hard look at a lighter projectile surely a 165 or 150 of a solidish construction would be more than suitable.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7571
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 4:07 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Ominivision1 wrote:
Load data taken from 6th (1972 edition) of handloaders digest for the 30/06/.

OV1, your a hoot! Saber-tooth tigers and mastadons! Given a choice, however, I wouldn't hunt with bullet designs from 40 years ago at longer ranges. I want confidence that my bullet is going to arrive where I aim it and will expand, penetrate, and stay intact. The load data you posted for a .30-06 with a 180gr bullet also places muzzle velocity in the 2700fps range. My objective is to still have 2000 fps at 500 yards. Here is what happens down range with this cartridge bullet combinations using a 0.5 BC which I think most of the bullets shown would fall short of. Lighter bullets have faster muzzle velocities but their lower BCs don't help them achieve this objective.



.30-06 down range data for 0.5 bc.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  52.55 KB
 Viewed:  7332 Time(s)

.30-06 down range data for 0.5 bc.jpg


_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7545
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 6:00 pm    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Im sure the thousands of bison that were taken with those "older bullets" would tell you that they worked just fine. the millions of red deer shot in this country using fmj .303 ball ammo would probably tell you the same thing. hit em in the boiler room and they will go down pretty quick smart.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
ElyBoy
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 1541
Location: Forest Lake Minnesota

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:19 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

I do like the .300 Win Mag.
I also have shot game with my .338 Win Mag.

However, the gang is very correct that the 180 gr is the load of choice for the 30-06.

My question is why, before a hunt, do you expect to shoot WAY out from 300-500 yards in the first place.
I'm a good shot, but except for one time, I have passed up those type of shots.

I don't mean to be a poop. Just wondering. Very Happy

Eric

_________________
NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
DNR Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
NRA Life Member
Back to top
View user's profile
TRBLSHTR
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 23, 2007
Posts: 1054
Location: Lower 48's-left coast(near portlandia)

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 10:07 am    Post subject: Re: .300 Win Mag or WSM? Reply with quote

Shocked Not to disparage anyones Ideas on their own personal "beliefs" on magnums vs. standard loads........But as I recall a little bit of history on the 30-06 cartridge;It was originally issued in '03 with a 220 grain projectile,later maybe in '06 to be changed to a 180 grain projectile and adopted by the us military in the standard issue springfield "03A3" type of rifle.I believe it remained with that loading until the second world war,and during its' time from 03 to 1940, it was used by members of the military and others to dispatch humans out to ranges beyond 1000 yds,and by hunters in just about any game hunting throughout the world at all ranges with all types of projectiles,sometime in the 1940's it's bullet was changed to the 150 grain weight.It is an all around cartridge,and has won camp perry and wmbleton rifle matches for many years.The only draw back to it's performance over the "magnums"in 30 caliber is that one has to learn to hold a bit higher on the target at the longer ranges.220,250,and someone even made a special 300 grain bullet for it over the many years of it's existance.I do own a 338 winmag-but it was a special purchase for a brown bear hunt in alaska,and I have seen nothing in the lower 48 that needs that kind of killing potential-except maybe a freight train!FWIW. YMMV:lol:
PS-I even have freinds that own 300 magnums. Razz

_________________
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." Thomas Mann
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.