HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: cyylyy1
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12495

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 51
BOT: 4
Total: 55
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Photo Albums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Home
15: Photo Albums
16: Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Albums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Photo Albums
24: Photo Albums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Photo Albums
29: Forums
30: Photo Albums
31: Forums
32: Your Account
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Home
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Your Account
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Home
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums
02: Your Account
03: Forums
04: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 304
 Pictures: 2343
  · Views: 309434
  · Votes: 1302
  · Comments: 85
 

Support our Advertisers

magnum v regular primers
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:24 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Omni -

My reference was only to small rifle primers. Big bore (large rifle primers) isn't an issue because all the cups are the same thickness. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:25 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

44Marty -

I'm going to have to back up a bit and reconsider what you said about Rem 7 1/2 primers being magnum.

I just came across this test showing the primer flash from different SR primers. Based on the flash and pressure, I'd say it was magnum level.

riflemansjournal.blogs...study.html

My apologies.
Back to top
View user's profile
inthedark
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Posts: 743
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

I found this article about primers and a study of brislance pressure and velocity. it is a good read.
www.btgresearch.org/Hi...0waves.pdf

_________________
Chimo
Ron

War is sweet to those who have no experience of it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach - Pindar 518-438BC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3451
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:25 am    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

HayCreek wrote:
I just came across this test showing the primer flash from different SR primers.

The picture of the 205M is the old version........ Today's version 205M is a lot hotter !!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3451
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:32 am    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

inthedark wrote:
it is a good read.

wtf Great !!! Now I need one of them there $$$ scales !!! Faint Does it ever end ??? Bang Head

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
44marty
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 20, 2009
Posts: 775
Location: Cheshire, MA; USA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

HayCreek wrote:
44Marty -

I'm going to have to back up a bit and reconsider what you said about Rem 7 1/2 primers being magnum.

I just came across this test showing the primer flash from different SR primers. Based on the flash and pressure, I'd say it was magnum level.

riflemansjournal.blogs...study.html

My apologies.

Very interesting article and follow-up article. A point briefly mentioned is something I have found to hold pretty true as a generality. The most accurate loads are those in which the powder most completely fills the case.

I was way off base about primers, according to the studies in the article. I had always thought that a hotter primer generally gave more consistent powder ignition. The quote below I have highlighted in bold seems to explain their view most simply.

Interesting exerpts from the articles:

Details of Bob’s pioneering tests can be found in: Highpower Rifle Shooting Volume III, NRA, 1983, Handloading Techniques and Long Range Shooting Techniques, Bob Jensen, p. 60. A very brief summary of Bob’s findings in that early series of tests, is that those primers which produced the lowest average velocity in his specially built Winchester Model 70 test rig (which fired BBs powered only by primers) produced the best accuracy in actual ammunition.
and:
We begin our process of data interpretation by bearing in mind Bob’s early tests with the primer-powered, BB firing Model 70. Those test showed that the primers which produced the lowest velocities with reasonable SD in the Model 70 “BB gun” were the most accurate at 600 to 1000 yards when loaded in .308 ammunition. In fact, our own testing with the 6BR showed that the most accurate primers at 600 yards were those which produced the lowest velocities. Remember, you can always adjust velocities with the powder charge, if needed for accuracy reasons; the issue isn’t low velocity per se, but rather the primer’s contribution to the velocity. The reason for this is that the primer contributes energy to the system in a manner quite disproportionate to its size; however, the precision with which priming compound is measured and dispensed into the cups is somewhat less than the precision with which a careful handloader measures and weighs powder charges. Accordingly, a high energy primer with (for example) 5% energy variability, will have a greater absolute effect on total energy variability than will a lower energy primer having the same 5% variability. A milder, softer primer is a more consistent primer. All of this assumes that the primer in question has sufficient energy to reliably ignite the powder charge in the relevant environmental conditions and sufficient cup thickness and hardness to resist blanking under the pressure generated. The magnum primer has a useful purpose, for instance, but firing mid-size cases on the target range in the summer is not that purpose.

Also:
We began the first article with reference to the soft primer of the corrosive primer era and its presumed beneficial effect on accuracy. I believe that we have demonstrated that a softer primer is beneficial to accuracy. Generally speaking, a primer with three characteristics: a small visual flash, relatively lower pressure and relatively lower muzzle velocity than its peers, is our definition of a soft primer that will maximize accuracy. Some primers embody one or two of those three characteristics and they may be acceptable in many loads, but for our purposes, all three must be met for the accurate characterization of a primer as a “soft primer”.

EDIT: . . . . and from the second link:

2) For most primer types tested, peak pressure magnitudes are well correlated with measured primer masses so that significant reductions in standard deviation are expected to result from sorting primers by mass.

My head is starting to hurt - Now I should not only be sorting brass by internal volume and bullets by weight, but primers by weight also in order to get the most accuracy??

I think I'm going to go back to the "minute of deer" approach and give up on my search for the most accurate firearm. I don't think I'll ever get any better than I had it with my .204 anyway, unless I invest in a rail gun.

_________________
_____________________________________

The strength of the wolf is in the pack; the strength of the pack is in the wolf. ~ R. Kipling

I LOVE YOU, LADY LUCK !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:06 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Quote::
My head is starting to hurt - Now I should not only be sorting brass by internal volume and bullets by weight, but primers by weight also in order to get the most accuracy??

Laughing Mine, too!

Problem is, I love trying to put 5 bullets into the smallest hole. I don't think I'll go as far as weighing the primers, tho'. What they say about the hotter primers having the greatest effect on velocity due to a mere 5% variability makes me consider finding a softer primer to test.

I've already tried CCI 400s but as I mentioned before, the cup is too thin for the .204 pressures. The Fed 205M looks about right in the pic, but Chambered221 says that's the older one and the new ones are hotter. What's a guy to do? Bang Head
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4411
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:31 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

HayCreek, Just keep testing! Each firearm has its individual preference anyway. If nothing else you'll get to shoot more!

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:29 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Yeah, guess I'll shoot out this barrel and test another one. Here's to more shootin' !! Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3451
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:34 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Try the CCI BR4....... It has the .025 thickness, heat range is between the 400 and 450 !!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:56 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Ok. Will do. Gotta go to town tomorrow, anyway. Might as well pick up a pack to test.

Then, the hard part...testing in cold weather. Temps are dropping, here, and I'm going to have to minimize another variable. Namely, a cold trigger finger!
The things we do in the name of science. Laughing

_________________
Laser/.204 Ruger....what's the difference?
Back to top
View user's profile
44marty
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 20, 2009
Posts: 775
Location: Cheshire, MA; USA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:46 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

HayCreek wrote:
Ok. Will do. Gotta go to town tomorrow, anyway. Might as well pick up a pack to test.

Then, the hard part...testing in cold weather. Temps are dropping, here, and I'm going to have to minimize another variable. Namely, a cold trigger finger!
The things we do in the name of science. Laughing

Rem 7 1/2 and CCI 450 primers both worked perfectly after spending a few days in the freezer at -4* F
I never did try standard primers in my .204 just magnum and benchrest. It would put 3 rounds into a hole you couldn't tell apart from the hole from a single round at 125 yards with magnum primers, Sierra 39gr BlitzKing bullets, Nosler custom brass and 25.6gr IMR3031 powder regardless of temperature and weather. I shot in weather ranging from 85*F and sunny to -10*F and snowing. (That was a freaky day - it usually doesn't snow here when it's that cold out. Talk about a cold trigger finger!!)

_________________
_____________________________________

The strength of the wolf is in the pack; the strength of the pack is in the wolf. ~ R. Kipling

I LOVE YOU, LADY LUCK !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
HayCreek
Member
Member


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 36
Location: Central ND

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:58 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

Quote::
Rem 7 1/2 and CCI 450 primers both worked perfectly after spending a few days in the freezer at -4* F

Good to know, marty. Just picked up 200 BR4s to test. I sorta hope they do better than the Rems. But, then again, I sorta don't...they're more expensive! Sad

You're one of the many shooters that get good performance with the SBKs. Me...that's another story. The dang things come out cockeyed in my rifle. Nosler and Hornady bullets - no problem.

Interesting about the 3031. Never tried it in the .204. Seems to be in the catagory of Hodgdon's extreme powders, although not so listed. Dang! another test coming, I think.

BTW- darn fine shooting! Salute
Best I've gotten is .2" c-c but not consistently enough. That's why I'm looking at primers after reading those tests.

_________________
Laser/.204 Ruger....what's the difference?
Back to top
View user's profile
Warnberg
Rookie Member
Rookie Member


Joined: Nov 28, 2010
Posts: 17
Location: Tampa, Florida

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:44 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

I may have discovered something here... the exact same load

Ruger 204

28.5 grains Varget 32gr V-MAX

@ sea level
CCI400 primers = evidence of cratering
Reminton 7 1/2 primer = no issues

@4000ft
CCI400 Primers = no issues, can even push load to 29.5 grains without issues

Remington 7 1/2's are listed as "BR" primers or Bench Rest primers
Back to top
View user's profile
inthedark
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Posts: 743
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:32 pm    Post subject: Re: magnum v regular primers Reply with quote

gelandangan wrote:
In my 300 Whisper, magnum primers gave consistently lower MV than standard primers.
I am sure I have checked and double checked my primers, I have also purchased a fresh box from another supplier just to try.

It must be because of the low charge amount.

Very Happy Yeah but you were burning coal! lo,l Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 4 of 6
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.