HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: StevHey
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12381

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 175
BOT: 4
Total: 179
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Albums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Photo Albums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Photo Albums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Photo Albums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Photo Albums
36: Photo Albums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Photo Albums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Photo Albums
55: Photo Albums
56: Forums
57: Photo Albums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Photo Albums
63: Forums
64: Photo Albums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Photo Albums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Home
73: Forums
74: Photo Albums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Photo Albums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Photo Albums
101: Forums
102: Photo Albums
103: Forums
104: Photo Albums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Photo Albums
121: Photo Albums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Photo Albums
126: Forums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Photo Albums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Photo Albums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Home
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Photo Albums
141: Home
142: Photo Albums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Forums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Photo Albums
152: Photo Albums
153: Photo Albums
154: Photo Albums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Photo Albums
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Photo Albums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 312
 Pictures: 2417
  · Views: 250032
  · Votes: 1255
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Bi-pod v sandbags !!!
Discussion that doesnt fit other Topics
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3432
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:44 am    Post subject: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

Has anyone done any testing for POI changes between bi-pods and sandbags ???
Be interested in any thoughts on the issue !!!

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4345
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:36 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

That would make a good test! I'll try to remember to test that next time I get to the range. Right now I'm wary of using a bipod on a hard surface because I figure it would have to bounce some.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
stovepipe
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 4678
Location: Pine, Az.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

Mr. Dear Sniper seems to do pretty darn well w/ bi-pods.
Back to top
View user's profile
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3432
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:31 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

Yes he does!!! I’ve asked him questions in regards to using one.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
whittling
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 21, 2008
Posts: 586
Location: Texas (home state is Mass)

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

Bipods are the best.

_________________
Molon labe!
Service, honor and courage, without these a warrior is nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
wiersy111
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 13, 2009
Posts: 2347
Location: Central Minnesota

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

I've used bi pods on a bench and they bounce pretty good, enough that the legs will start to retract if you don't get the knobs extremely tight!!!!

_________________
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America " for an amount of "up to and including my life."

US ARMY RETIRED

The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.

Being "Over the Hill" is much better then being under it!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Vince
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 12813
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

Only time I have ever used a bipod is on a machine gun (Bren, M60 and Mag58) when I was in the Army, although I've been threatening to buy a bipod for my Weatherby Vanguard for a couple of years...just can't afford a Harris Bipod yet.

I don't think that there would be any difference of POI between a bipod and sandbags...assuming both are under the forearm and not in contact with the barrel. A rifle will move a similar amount on either rest on firing. It would be after the initial recoil that there would likely be any difference, and that would only be in the "settling" of the rifle back onto its rest.

Cheers, Vince

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger
Dimitri
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 25, 2005
Posts: 5906
Location: Southern Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:25 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

I do believe these are one of the more "in the head" problems, there are 2 very different schools of thought and they do not agree.

Myself I just sling up and let God guide the bullets to target if that counts. Confused

Dimitri

_________________
A thousand hills, but no birds in flight, ten thousand paths, with no people's tracks. A lonely boat, a straw-hatted old man, fishing alone in the cold river snow.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3432
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:53 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

So no-one has actually shot the same gun and load combination using the two different types of rest to see what might happen!!!

Here of late I’ve done some very limited testing (I hesitate to call it testing) with different types of rest to see if group size and POI are affected enough to warrant some further investigation.

My deer rifle is sighted in 1 inch high at 100 yards using a sandbag rest.
With the bi-pod on the gun it shoots 3 ½ inches low at 100 yards, for a total difference of 4 ½ inches between the two rest.
I found this to be rather surprising and wanted to do more shooting to confirm what I had seen. Being limited on loaded ammo right now and time restraints I was hoping someone could confirm what I saw.

D, could you please elaborate a little more on what your trying to say.
Not sure how to take it or what it means !!!
As far as slinging up, why not take advantage of a solid rest when it’s available. Especially when the possibility exist to shoot a deer out to 600 yards !!!

Whittling, I thought long ago bi-pods were the way to go because of their wide stance and stability.
In the beginning days of F-class shooting everyone was using them. Now days you’re hard pressed to see one on the firing line. Most all shooters have migrated to a mechanical rest/bag combo because they have been proven a better mouse trap so to speak.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 924
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:32 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

My experiences have pretty much mirrored yours. Each of my rifles shoots differently when comparing sandbags to bipods, which is why if I am planning to use bipods in the field I zero the rifle while using one. Even then, slight deviations in hold and position can still change POI. I mostly rely on a backpack or rolled jacket now.

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dimitri
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 25, 2005
Posts: 5906
Location: Southern Ontario

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:33 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

I mean the people who use sandbags and the people who use bipods seem to have very different views and I never heard one say that the other may work just as well. Smile

As for shooting to 600 yards, not on a deer, however I shoot with the sling because that is the worse way I'd find myself shooting so I practice as I hunt.

Dimitri

_________________
A thousand hills, but no birds in flight, ten thousand paths, with no people's tracks. A lonely boat, a straw-hatted old man, fishing alone in the cold river snow.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
stovepipe
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 4678
Location: Pine, Az.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:47 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

D makes a good point.

My hold and trigger control (human element) has more to do with my first shot POI than what I rest the stock on. (e.g. tactical .308 bipod on card table, M-59/M1 from concrete bench w/ cinder block/ towel etc. Never used a rear rest for some reason)

For me what I rest it on is a matter of convenience. Short of resting the bbl on something I'm not sure how the [front] rest, if solid, would affect the POI on the first shot.
Back to top
View user's profile
wiersy111
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 13, 2009
Posts: 2347
Location: Central Minnesota

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

I have to say the only thing I experienced with the bi pod is the jump on a hard surface. But I have to say that I concentrate more on the fundamentals of breathing, trigger squeeze, and picking up the same position on the stock as well as sight picture. I still do dime and washer drills occasionally when I get shaky.

_________________
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America " for an amount of "up to and including my life."

US ARMY RETIRED

The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.

Being "Over the Hill" is much better then being under it!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3432
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:28 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

The bounce that occurs when using a bi-pod on a hard surface seems to be of concern and talk anytime this issue is brought up.

Just for the record, I have shot groups using them that are very close to what the rifle has been proven to be capable of.
Some of those groups have measured ½ -¾ inch. (3 shots @ 100Y)

SingleShotLover wrote:
Even then, slight deviations in hold and position can still change POI.

SSL, How much deviation are you seeing at 300-500?
Is it enough for me to be concerned with shooting at deer?

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3432
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:42 am    Post subject: Re: Bi-pod v sandbags !!! Reply with quote

I have an idea about incorporating a piece of sorbothane material underneath the legs of the bi-pod!!! (the stuff some recoil pads are made of)
Or maybe even making some kind of a re-placement for the hard rubber feet that’s on my Harris.
I got it figured that this should absorb some energy and take the bounce out of it.

Does anyone know where I can get such material?

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » General
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.