HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: DoninMontana
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12442

People Online:
Members: 1
Visitors: 125
BOT: 4
Total: 130
Who Is Where:
 Members:
01: Bushmaster > Home
 Visitors:
01: Photo Albums
02: Photo Albums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Albums
10: Photo Albums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Photo Albums
18: Home
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Photo Albums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Photo Albums
54: Photo Albums
55: Photo Albums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Photo Albums
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Your Account
65: Your Account
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Home
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Photo Albums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Photo Albums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Home
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Photo Albums
98: Forums
99: Photo Albums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Home
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Home
107: Forums
108: Home
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Photo Albums
112: Forums
113: Your Account
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Photo Albums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Photo Albums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
  BOT:
01: Statistics
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 301
 Pictures: 2358
  · Views: 285181
  · Votes: 1297
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Disapointed In Sierra ...
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wncchester
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:46 am    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

All manuals differ, sometimes quite a bit. Which is "right"? I suspect they all are.

If they all used the same powder lot, same bullets, primers, cases and same rifle they would likely agree pretty closely. But that isn't possible, is it?

Thus, "Start low, only move up....", etc., is the ONLY certain book rule.
Back to top
View user's profile
fnuser
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Posts: 911
Location: S.W. Missouri, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:07 am    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

Don't feel bad chambered I have one that is copywrite 1971, it doesn't say what edition it is so I suspect it is the 1st.

_________________
N.R.A. Endowment Member
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
skb2706
Member
Member


Joined: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:39 am    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

Your comparison included Lee data and Sierra data. The Lee book cost you $6 and for my money its way over priced. Full of less than useful information and data derived from their interpetation of others data. Sierra actually tests their data and offers loads of free infomation and tips just for the asking. In this case consider the source.

When it comes to loading for a SA rifle I would put function ahead of bullet speed anyday, all day.
Back to top
View user's profile
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3120
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:32 am    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

Whats really frustrating is if you have books from a single MFG going over many versions, and the loads from the newer books are DRAMATICALLY different from ones in the old books.

I have a couple Hodgdon manuals like that, with a difference in over 300fps in the max load for a particular caliber. If powders are blended with the same burn rate year after year, what could possible cause such a descrepancy in the load information???


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
TRBLSHTR
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Mar 23, 2007
Posts: 1037
Location: Lower 48's-left coast(near portlandia)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

DallanC wrote:
Whats really frustrating is if you have books from a single MFG going over many versions, and the loads from the newer books are DRAMATICALLY different from ones in the old books.

I have a couple Hodgdon manuals like that, with a difference in over 300fps in the max load for a particular caliber. If powders are blended with the same burn rate year after year, what could possible cause such a descrepancy in the load information???


-DallanC
Load information changes because of too many lawyers,insurance companies/underwriters,and certain reloaders that load beyond their competancy levels. Sad

_________________
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." Thomas Mann
Back to top
View user's profile
chambered221
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 3439
Location: Lost for good !!!

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

Take a look at the pressure information that is sometimes available.
Using the 308 Winchester as an example; SAAMI set the limit at 52,000 CUP or 60,000 PSI.
Looking at a Hodgdon basic manual I find the 150gr. B-Tip used in conjunction with H322 only gives 50,500 CUP with a MAX charge of 40.0 gr.
I'm willing to bet you can get a lot more 322 in a 308 case. So the question becomes why limit it to only 40.0 grains.

IMO the answer comes down to the load being useful or not !!!
As you reach a loads MAX it starts to become inconsistent, sure we can run it up more and obtain a higher velocity safely but then we sacrifice the loads integrity. Most re-loaders I know will give up speed anytime they can gain consistency.
It's my opinion that the older manuals reflected this and those that obtain the data know we as re-loaders want the consistency.


Another aspect to this is how things have changed in the industry over the years.
New ways of mixing and formulating powders have actually made them more economical.
As an example talk to anyone that used Red Dot in their shotguns in the 70's. You had to use more of it and it left a lot of unburnt powder and residue in the barrel. Today it's one of the cleaner shotgun powders available.

_________________
Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3382
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

The other issue - and a big one in my opinion is that - we have a better understanding of the limited information that the copper crusher system of pressure reading and have the better information of the peizo-electric system that displays the entire pressure curve.
Ballisticians have learned that some of the older information actually produced pressures that exceeded the SAMMI maximums. Loads have been adjusted accordingly.
Lawyers have little to do with powder recommendations - those powder companies know that we want total performance and safety in our loads. they also what us around to buy more powder too.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4385
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Disapointed In Sierra ... Reply with quote

What PaulS said! Better equipment for measuring pressures means safer loads for us. One manufacturer (Speer?) was reshooting its suggested loads and switching all to PSI from CUP.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.