HuntingNut » News » The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: patrad69

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13133

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 194

BOT: 1

Total: 195

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Your Account
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Home
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Home
09: Home
10: Your Account
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Albums
19: Photo Albums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Photo Albums
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Photo Albums
26: Photo Albums
27: Forums
28: Photo Albums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Forums
33: Photo Albums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: News
37: Home
38: PointBlank Online
39: Forums
40: News
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: Your Account
46: Forums
47: News
48: News
49: Photo Albums
50: Forums
51: Photo Albums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Home
55: Photo Albums
56: Home
57: Forums
58: Photo Albums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Home
62: Forums
63: Photo Albums
64: Forums
65: Photo Albums
66: Photo Albums
67: Forums
68: Your Account
69: Photo Albums
70: Photo Albums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Photo Albums
74: Forums
75: Photo Albums
76: Forums
77: Photo Albums
78: Photo Albums
79: Forums
80: Photo Albums
81: Forums
82: Your Account
83: Forums
84: Photo Albums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Photo Albums
89: Photo Albums
90: Your Account
91: Forums
92: Photo Albums
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Home
96: Photo Albums
97: Photo Albums
98: Forums
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Photo Albums
102: Home
103: Photo Albums
104: Your Account
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Photo Albums
108: Photo Albums
109: Home
110: Photo Albums
111: Your Account
112: Forums
113: News
114: Photo Albums
115: Your Account
116: Photo Albums
117: Photo Albums
118: Photo Albums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: News
125: Photo Albums
126: Forums
127: Home
128: Forums
129: Photo Albums
130: Photo Albums
131: Forums
132: Reloading Database
133: Photo Albums
134: Photo Albums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Photo Albums
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Photo Albums
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Home
147: Forums
148: Your Account
149: Home
150: Photo Albums
151: Photo Albums
152: Photo Albums
153: Photo Albums
154: Forums
155: Photo Albums
156: Photo Albums
157: Your Account
158: Forums
159: Forums
160: Forums
161: Your Account
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Photo Albums
165: Forums
166: Home
167: Home
168: Photo Albums
169: Photo Albums
170: Photo Albums
171: Forums
172: Home
173: Photo Albums
174: Forums
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Forums
179: Photo Albums
180: Photo Albums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Photo Albums
185: Forums
186: Photo Albums
187: Forums
188: Home
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Forums
193: Home
194: Photo Albums

BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2455
  · Views: 824575
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 85

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate
A chat room discussion got me looking hard at the “.308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield” debate. My contention was that there was no significant difference between the ballistics of the two in hunting situations, or for that matter in any other situation. So let’s examine the ballistics of both cartridges and compare.
First we’ll take a quick look at the history of both cartridges. The .30-06 Springfield started life as a US military cartridge in 1906. It was derived from the “.30 Model 1903” cartridge that was designed to replace the .30-40 Krag. The ’03 cartridge used the same 220 grain round nosed bullet as the .30-40. The ’06 is essentially the same case as the ’03 with a 150 grain spitzer bullet at 2800 ft/sec. The .30-06 was the primary cartridge for the US military until it was “replaced” by the .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO in 1954. The .308’s original load was a 149 grain spitzer at 2800 ft/sec. Both cartridges have certainly been very successful in military, match and hunting use! (Reference “Handloading” by William C. Davis, Jr.)

To quote the Speer #13 manual, “In the hunting field, ballistic differences between the 308 and the 30-06 are negligible.” The .308 was designed to duplicate the .30-06 for military use, but in a half inch shorter package. Both guns use the same 0.308” bullets. These bullets range from 100 grains to 250 grains in various styles. I figured that the .30-06 would have an advantage as the bullets get over 180 grains because its case was originally designed for the heavier bullets.
The most common hunting bullet weights for these cartridges are the 150, 165 and 180 grain. I realize that there are tons of loads for each cartridge but you’ve gotta start somewhere. I looked in the Speer #13 manual and compared their loads for both cartridges. I figure this is a pretty good comparison as loads for both cartridges were fired in the same type rifle, a Remington 700 with a 22” barrel. In each case I took the bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient and the highest velocity listed.

Here is a chart of the muzzle velocities for each bullet for both cartridges, the difference between them (.30-06 minus .308) and the percentage of that difference:
Bullet weight .308 .30-06 Difference %
150 2919 2847 -72 ft/sec -2.5
165 2812 2803 -9 ft/sec -0.3
180 2623 2756 133 ft/sec 4.8

From the chart we can see that the average difference in velocities for the three bullets is 17 ft/sec, or 0.6%, in favor of the .30-06. Now don’t forget that these are average velocities. In a string of shots a cartridge/gun’s velocity can easily have a standard deviation of 1% or more. In other words the normal variations in loads result in a built-in error that pretty much means we can’t count on such a small difference to be meaningful.

So, what does all this mean downrange? We’ll zero both guns at 200 yards and compare the bullet energy there. Let’s also take a look at what the bullets will be doing at 400 yards, which is a heck of a long shot for hunting. I used the “PointBlank” ballistics program to make the comparisons.

With the 150 grain bullet the .308 has 2093 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards while the .30-06 has 1985 foot-pounds. Out at 400 yards the .308 will have dropped 20.9 inches, and still has 1512 foot-pounds. The .30-06 will have dropped 22.13 inches and maintains 1428 foot-pounds. The .308 shows 5.9% more energy at 400 yards.

Then with the 165 grain bullet 200 yards the .308 shows 2202 foot-pounds versus 2187 foot-pounds for the .30-06. At 400 yards the .308 drops 21.90 inches and has 1645 foot-pounds. The .30-06 drops 22.06 inches with 1633 foot-pounds left. At 400 yards the .308 has a tiny 0.7% energy advantage.

Finally we take the 180 grain bullet, which should give the biggest advantage to the .30-06. At the 200 yard mark the .308 will have an energy of 2143 foot-pounds and the .30-06 will have 2379 foot-pounds. The .30-06 has about 11% more energy. When we get out to 400 yards the .308 will be 24.64 inches low and still have 1647 foot-pounds while the .30-06 will be 22.10 inches low and still carry 1840 foot-pounds. That means that at 400 yards the .30-06 has an 11.7% advantage in energy.

Now I’m sure that folks will look up their favorite of these two and “prove” that it is better in some manual or another. I looked in some other manuals too and found varying velocities. One thing I noticed in one manual was that, with 250 grain bullets (yes, that is two hundred and fifty grains), there was only 100 feet per sec difference in the velocities of the two cartridges. That particular manual doesn’t give any barrel lengths though.

Just for giggles I also looked at the .270 Winchester and .280 Remington loads in the same Speer manual. With a 22” barrel and a 150 grain bullet at 2907 feet per second the .270 has 2170 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1648 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 19.98 inches. The .280, with a 24” barrel and a 145 grain bullet at 2975 feet per second, shows 2209 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1689 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 18.83”. So, both of these cartridges “beat” the .30 caliber rounds in energy and trajectory.

When it’s all said and done does either the .308 or the .30-06 really have any ballistic advantage over the other? I’ll concede that an 11% difference in energy with the 180 grain bullet is an advantage but I wonder if a deer on the receiving end tell the difference between 1647 and 1840 foot-pounds of energy? Considering the overall differences and performance of both cartridges I’ll stick to my assertion that there is no SIGNIFICANT ballistic advantage with either cartridge. Now just pick which ever you like and enjoy shooting it!

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 (18:29:48) (37593 reads) [ Administration ]