HuntingNut » News » Ruger 77 Compact in .260 Remington

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: IPutMoInYoA

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13131

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 320

BOT: 1

Total: 321

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Photo Albums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Home
14: News
15: Photo Albums
16: Forums
17: Home
18: Your Account
19: News
20: Your Account
21: Your Account
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Home
25: Forums
26: News
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Home
30: Your Account
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: PointBlank Online
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Home
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Photo Albums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: News
46: Home
47: Forums
48: Home
49: News
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Photo Albums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Home
56: Forums
57: Home
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Your Account
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Home
65: Your Account
66: Forums
67: Home
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Photo Albums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Photo Albums
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Forums
78: News
79: News
80: Your Account
81: Articles: Topics
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Photo Albums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Your Account
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Photo Albums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Your Account
100: Forums
101: News
102: Your Account
103: Forums
104: Home
105: Your Account
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Your Account
113: Photo Albums
114: Forums
115: Home
116: Your Account
117: Photo Albums
118: Your Account
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Home
123: Forums
124: Photo Albums
125: News
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Photo Albums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Your Account
132: Forums
133: Home
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Home
138: Forums
139: Forums
140: Forums
141: Your Account
142: Photo Albums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Home
147: Forums
148: Your Account
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Forums
153: Your Account
154: Photo Albums
155: Photo Albums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Forums
159: News
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Home
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Forums
170: Forums
171: Forums
172: Forums
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Photo Albums
176: News
177: Forums
178: Forums
179: News
180: Forums
181: Your Account
182: Forums
183: News
184: Forums
185: News
186: Home
187: Photo Albums
188: Your Account
189: Photo Albums
190: Forums
191: Home
192: Home
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Photo Albums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Forums
201: Forums
202: Home
203: Forums
204: Forums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Home
208: Forums
209: Home
210: Home
211: Forums
212: Photo Albums
213: Forums
214: Your Account
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Photo Albums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Photo Albums
221: Forums
222: Forums
223: Forums
224: Forums
225: Forums
226: Photo Albums
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Forums
230: Home
231: News
232: Your Account
233: Your Account
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Home
240: Forums
241: Home
242: Your Account
243: Home
244: Home
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Photo Albums
248: Forums
249: News
250: Your Account
251: Photo Albums
252: Photo Albums
253: Forums
254: Forums
255: Forums
256: Forums
257: Home
258: Forums
259: Home
260: Photo Albums
261: Photo Albums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Forums
265: Home
266: Forums
267: Forums
268: Photo Albums
269: Photo Albums
270: Forums
271: Home
272: Your Account
273: Forums
274: Home
275: Forums
276: Forums
277: Home
278: Forums
279: Forums
280: Home
281: Forums
282: Home
283: Photo Albums
284: Forums
285: Your Account
286: Photo Albums
287: News
288: Forums
289: Home
290: Forums
291: Your Account
292: Photo Albums
293: News
294: Home
295: Home
296: Forums
297: Forums
298: Home
299: Photo Albums
300: Forums
301: Forums
302: Forums
303: Forums
304: Forums
305: Home
306: News
307: Your Account
308: Your Account
309: Forums
310: Your Account
311: Photo Albums
312: Forums
313: Home
314: Photo Albums
315: Forums
316: Forums
317: Photo Albums
318: Forums
319: Photo Albums
320: Forums

BOT:
01: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824590
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86

Ruger 77 Compact in .260 Remington

In spring 2005 I acquired a Ruger 77 Mark II Compact chambered in .260 Remington. I gave a lot of thought to this rifle and handled it at several gun shows before I finally broke down and bought it. There were several considerations in my choice. I wanted a small, fairly light weight rifle that I could use for deer and maybe varmints too. I wanted it to be pretty weather resistant. I also wanted a cartridge that I felt would cleanly kill deer but not have quite as much recoil as my .280 Remington. I’ll try to explain my thinking as I describe the rifle and cartridge.

First, let’s discuss the rifle. I had decided that I wanted a stainless steel action and barrel with a laminated stock to make it a bit more weather proof than my wood stocked .280. I know that a synthetic stock is even more weather resistant but I just like the looks and weight of the laminated stocks better. I’m trying to walk a fine line between “light for carry” and “heavy to absorb recoil”. I wanted a compact rifle that my daughters could use comfortably should I ever con them into hunting with me. I had narrowed my choice down to a Remington Model 7 or the Ruger. In the end I never saw a Remington exactly like I wanted but I kept bumping into this little Ruger at the local gun shows.

The Ruger 77 Mark II Compact is all stainless with a gray and black laminated stock. This is a rather small rifle. It has a 16.5” barrel and is 35.5” long overall. Length of pull is 12.5”, a bit shorter than usual. This length will be easy for my younger daughter to handle as she is only about 5’ 1” tall. It weighs 6.25 pounds without a scope. Magazine capacity with the .260 Remington cartridges is four rounds. It has a three position safety that I really like. The safety lever moves horizontally. The first position, forward, is “fire”. The second position, middle, is “safe” but you can still operate the bolt for loading or unloading. In the third position, back, the rifle is “safe” and the bolt is locked closed.

One of the concerns I had was whether the rifle could handle the heavier bullets in this caliber. I like the option of a “heavy for caliber” bullet for hunting. Early reports I saw on the .260 rifles said that they wouldn’t stabilize heavy bullets because the twist rate was too slow. This Ruger has a twist of 1 turn in 8 inches, which is faster than earlier .260s and I think faster than the 6.5x55mm Swedish Mauser. It looked like this would work for the 160 grain bullets that I wanted to try.

I added a Simmons AETEC 2.8-to-10X scope to the rifle. Ruger’s built in mounts always make this an easy job. I did have this scope mounted on “Ol’ Splintermaker”, my Winchester Model 70. The Simmons has a short tube though, and I never did like the way it fit the long action Win 70. However it fits the short action Ruger perfectly. The optics are bright and clear and the zoom range gives me what I need for short range woods hunting or long range varmints. With the scope mounted the rifle weighs 7.5 pounds.

Now let's talk about the cartridge. The .260 Remington is part of the .308 Winchester case family, along with the .243 Winchester, 7mm-08 and .358 Winchester. It was introduced in 1997. Initially it was intended as a target round, taking advantage of the high ballistic coefficients that the 6.5mm bullet have. The “useful case capacity” is 3.32 cubic centimeters. The .264 bullets are available in weights from 85 to 160 grains. The Lee manual gives velocities up to 3340 fps for the 85 grain bullets and 2595 fps for the 160s. I know that a lot of folks use a .243 Winchester for deer but I wanted something that would fire a heavier bullet. Blame it on all those books I read about African hunting. The heaviest .243s are only 105 grains so the .260 gives me a lot more to play with.

To get ready for shooting I placed an order to Midway for Hornady dies and Remington brass. I picked the Hornady 129 grain SST and the Hornady 160 grain round nose bullets for initial testing. I had just bought a pound of Hodgdon H4831SC so I thought I’d try that first. CCI 200 primers completed the first batches of loads. One aspect of the loads that I looked at was the pressure vs. the velocity. I wanted to try some loads that showed a lower pressure to see if I could reduce muzzle blast by any noticeable level.

All cases were sized full length and trimmed to the same length. Case mouths and flash holes were deburred. Every powder charge was weighed, especially after I realized that the powder wouldn’t meter very well through my measure. All of the charges were about at the “Starting Load” level. Bullets were seated a bit long, just short of the lands.

I hit a snag when I started loading the 160 grain round noses. I always run that first cartridge that I finish through the gun before continuing, to make sure it chambers OK. Although it chambered fine it wouldn’t feed worth a flip. In fact not at all! This Hornady has a VERY blunt nose and it kept catching on the edge of the chamber. I decided to load five just to see if they would stabilize. I checked some catalogs and saw that Sierra has a 160 grain “semi pointed” bullet that I might try later. An article I read in “Rifle” magazine said that the premium 140 grain bullets penetrated better than the 160s anyway, due to bullet construction. I’ll have to rethink my strategy here.

The 129 grain SST bullets fed fine. Since I had some cases prepped that I didn’t use for the 160 grain bullets I used them to load some of the SSTs over Hodgdon Varget powder. Varget is supposed to be pretty accurate in this family of cartridges.

I finally got to the range with my new toy. Although the temperature was comfortable the wind was blowing pretty good, swirling through the valley where the range is located. There were some thunderstorms moving into the area. Every gust of wind brought clouds of dust, pollen and debris onto the range. I decided to go ahead and shoot some 10 shot groups at 100 yards to check the velocities because I wasn’t sure when I’d get the next chance. Because we were trying to beat the storm I didn’t let the barrel cool between shots or groups.

The first loads tried were the 129 grain SSTs over Varget. My Chrony showed an average velocity of 2438 ft/sec. Extreme spread was 86 ft/sec and the standard deviation was 23.8 ft/sec. The group size was right about 2” and interestingly enough almost made a “+” sign on the target. I was disappointed with these starting loads and wonder if raising the charge will improve the accuracy.

The next loads tested were the 129 grain SSTs over H4831SC. These averaged 2510 ft/sec with an extreme spread of 64 ft/sec and a standard deviation of 21.3 ft/sec. If I throw out the called flyer I have a 1.4” group. With the flyer it opened up to 3”.

Finally I tried the five 160 grain Hornady RNs over H4831SC. I had to drop each one into the chamber. Average velocity was 2263 ft/sec with an extreme spread of 21 ft/sec and a standard deviation of only 7.8 ft/sec. Figures huh? Naturally they also made the best group, 1.1”. My shooting buddy asked “How fast can you load those one at a time?” I noticed that all three loads shot to the same point of impact at 100 yards.

Shooting from the bench I found that the rifle was very comfortable, even with the shorter stock. The trigger was decent and the recoil was fairly mild. Calculated recoil energy for the .260 was 12.3 ft-lb compared to 18.8 for my .280. I was also shooting a Winchester 94 .44 Magnum carbine that day and the .260 was much more enjoyable. My buddy fired a few rounds too and liked the way the rifle handled. I couldn’t really tell any difference in the muzzle blast between the H4831SC loads and the slightly lower pressure Varget loads. At a later range session I had a young lady in her teens shoot some of the 140 grain bullet loads and she really liked the rifle too.

I was pretty pleased with the H4831SC loads, especially because they were almost literally the first shot out of the gun, there hadn’t been any load tweaking yet. Powder charges were pretty safe so I thought I could increase the velocity some, although 2500 ft/sec out of a 16.5” barrel isn’t too bad. On a later trip to the range I was able to try some maximum loads of the same powder with the same bullet and gained a whopping 30 ft/sec. Group size was the same. Apparently the short barrel is doing about all it can with this combination.

After I started working on this review “Shooting Times” ran two articles, one on the .260 Remington cartridge and another on the Ruger 77 “Frontier” rifle. The “Frontier” is the same rifle I have with the addition of a rib in front of the action that allows a “Scout scope” to be mounted. You can find these in the May 2005 issue.

In the fall of 2005 I finally did some hunting with the rifle. I really liked the way the gun handled in the woods and up in a tree stand. A small whitetail buck became the first live target. One of the Hornady 129 grain SSTs placed behind his left shoulder at about 40 yards turned his heart/lung area to mush and he ran about 50 yards. The only exit wound was found by the BB sized drop of blood on his off-side shoulder.

Over all I am very pleased with my purchase. In fact I like the handling so much that I hope to buy a Ruger Frontier chambered for .338 Federal for use as another “woods gun”. I think the Compact in .260 Rem. would be an excellent rifle for smaller shooters while not giving up much in performance on medium sized game. It is exactly what I hoped it would be as far as something my girls could shoot comfortably. However, they haven’t shot it yet and, you know, I never really told them that I’d bought it for them…

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Saturday, October 27, 2007 (21:22:50) (23560 reads) [ Administration ]