HuntingNut » News » The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: IPutMoInYoA

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13131

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 266

BOT: 2

Total: 268

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Photo Albums
05: Forums
06: Your Account
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Photo Albums
10: Forums
11: Your Account
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Your Account
16: Forums
17: Home
18: Forums
19: Photo Albums
20: Home
21: Forums
22: Home
23: Forums
24: Your Account
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Your Account
32: Home
33: Forums
34: Statistics
35: Photo Albums
36: Home
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Home
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Your Account
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Your Account
47: Photo Albums
48: Your Account
49: Your Account
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Home
53: Photo Albums
54: Home
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Forums
62: Home
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Your Account
69: Home
70: Home
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Photo Albums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Home
77: Your Account
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Your Account
83: Home
84: Forums
85: Your Account
86: Home
87: Forums
88: Home
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Photo Albums
92: Forums
93: Home
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Your Account
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Your Account
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Home
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Home
121: Your Account
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Home
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Photo Albums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Home
131: News
132: Forums
133: Forums
134: Photo Albums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Home
139: Forums
140: Your Account
141: Forums
142: Forums
143: Home
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Forums
147: Forums
148: Your Account
149: Photo Albums
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Photo Albums
153: Home
154: Forums
155: Forums
156: Your Account
157: Forums
158: Home
159: Your Account
160: Photo Albums
161: Your Account
162: Photo Albums
163: Forums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Your Account
167: Forums
168: Forums
169: Your Account
170: Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Forums
174: Forums
175: Home
176: Forums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Home
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Home
185: Home
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Home
191: Forums
192: Photo Albums
193: Forums
194: Forums
195: Forums
196: Forums
197: Forums
198: Forums
199: Forums
200: Your Account
201: Home
202: Photo Albums
203: Forums
204: Photo Albums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Statistics
209: Forums
210: Home
211: Photo Albums
212: Forums
213: Forums
214: Home
215: Forums
216: Forums
217: Forums
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Your Account
221: Forums
222: Photo Albums
223: Home
224: Forums
225: Photo Albums
226: Forums
227: Forums
228: Photo Albums
229: Forums
230: Forums
231: Forums
232: Forums
233: Photo Albums
234: Forums
235: Forums
236: Forums
237: Forums
238: Forums
239: Forums
240: Photo Albums
241: Photo Albums
242: Your Account
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Your Account
246: Forums
247: Your Account
248: Forums
249: Photo Albums
250: Home
251: Home
252: Forums
253: Forums
254: Forums
255: Home
256: Your Account
257: Forums
258: Photo Albums
259: Home
260: Forums
261: Forums
262: Home
263: Forums
264: Home
265: Photo Albums
266: Forums

BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824013
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate

The Great .308 versus .30-06 Debate
A chat room discussion got me looking hard at the “.308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield” debate. My contention was that there was no significant difference between the ballistics of the two in hunting situations, or for that matter in any other situation. So let’s examine the ballistics of both cartridges and compare.
First we’ll take a quick look at the history of both cartridges. The .30-06 Springfield started life as a US military cartridge in 1906. It was derived from the “.30 Model 1903” cartridge that was designed to replace the .30-40 Krag. The ’03 cartridge used the same 220 grain round nosed bullet as the .30-40. The ’06 is essentially the same case as the ’03 with a 150 grain spitzer bullet at 2800 ft/sec. The .30-06 was the primary cartridge for the US military until it was “replaced” by the .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO in 1954. The .308’s original load was a 149 grain spitzer at 2800 ft/sec. Both cartridges have certainly been very successful in military, match and hunting use! (Reference “Handloading” by William C. Davis, Jr.)

To quote the Speer #13 manual, “In the hunting field, ballistic differences between the 308 and the 30-06 are negligible.” The .308 was designed to duplicate the .30-06 for military use, but in a half inch shorter package. Both guns use the same 0.308” bullets. These bullets range from 100 grains to 250 grains in various styles. I figured that the .30-06 would have an advantage as the bullets get over 180 grains because its case was originally designed for the heavier bullets.
The most common hunting bullet weights for these cartridges are the 150, 165 and 180 grain. I realize that there are tons of loads for each cartridge but you’ve gotta start somewhere. I looked in the Speer #13 manual and compared their loads for both cartridges. I figure this is a pretty good comparison as loads for both cartridges were fired in the same type rifle, a Remington 700 with a 22” barrel. In each case I took the bullet with the highest ballistic coefficient and the highest velocity listed.

Here is a chart of the muzzle velocities for each bullet for both cartridges, the difference between them (.30-06 minus .308) and the percentage of that difference:
Bullet weight .308 .30-06 Difference %
150 2919 2847 -72 ft/sec -2.5
165 2812 2803 -9 ft/sec -0.3
180 2623 2756 133 ft/sec 4.8

From the chart we can see that the average difference in velocities for the three bullets is 17 ft/sec, or 0.6%, in favor of the .30-06. Now don’t forget that these are average velocities. In a string of shots a cartridge/gun’s velocity can easily have a standard deviation of 1% or more. In other words the normal variations in loads result in a built-in error that pretty much means we can’t count on such a small difference to be meaningful.

So, what does all this mean downrange? We’ll zero both guns at 200 yards and compare the bullet energy there. Let’s also take a look at what the bullets will be doing at 400 yards, which is a heck of a long shot for hunting. I used the “PointBlank” ballistics program to make the comparisons.

With the 150 grain bullet the .308 has 2093 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards while the .30-06 has 1985 foot-pounds. Out at 400 yards the .308 will have dropped 20.9 inches, and still has 1512 foot-pounds. The .30-06 will have dropped 22.13 inches and maintains 1428 foot-pounds. The .308 shows 5.9% more energy at 400 yards.

Then with the 165 grain bullet 200 yards the .308 shows 2202 foot-pounds versus 2187 foot-pounds for the .30-06. At 400 yards the .308 drops 21.90 inches and has 1645 foot-pounds. The .30-06 drops 22.06 inches with 1633 foot-pounds left. At 400 yards the .308 has a tiny 0.7% energy advantage.

Finally we take the 180 grain bullet, which should give the biggest advantage to the .30-06. At the 200 yard mark the .308 will have an energy of 2143 foot-pounds and the .30-06 will have 2379 foot-pounds. The .30-06 has about 11% more energy. When we get out to 400 yards the .308 will be 24.64 inches low and still have 1647 foot-pounds while the .30-06 will be 22.10 inches low and still carry 1840 foot-pounds. That means that at 400 yards the .30-06 has an 11.7% advantage in energy.

Now I’m sure that folks will look up their favorite of these two and “prove” that it is better in some manual or another. I looked in some other manuals too and found varying velocities. One thing I noticed in one manual was that, with 250 grain bullets (yes, that is two hundred and fifty grains), there was only 100 feet per sec difference in the velocities of the two cartridges. That particular manual doesn’t give any barrel lengths though.

Just for giggles I also looked at the .270 Winchester and .280 Remington loads in the same Speer manual. With a 22” barrel and a 150 grain bullet at 2907 feet per second the .270 has 2170 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1648 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 19.98 inches. The .280, with a 24” barrel and a 145 grain bullet at 2975 feet per second, shows 2209 foot-pounds at 200 yards and 1689 foot-pounds at 400 yards, while dropping 18.83”. So, both of these cartridges “beat” the .30 caliber rounds in energy and trajectory.

When it’s all said and done does either the .308 or the .30-06 really have any ballistic advantage over the other? I’ll concede that an 11% difference in energy with the 180 grain bullet is an advantage but I wonder if a deer on the receiving end tell the difference between 1647 and 1840 foot-pounds of energy? Considering the overall differences and performance of both cartridges I’ll stick to my assertion that there is no SIGNIFICANT ballistic advantage with either cartridge. Now just pick which ever you like and enjoy shooting it!

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 (18:29:48) (37348 reads) [ Administration ]