HuntingNut » News » Ruger 77 Compact in .260 Remington

Home • Community Forums • Photo Albums • Register

Modules

• Home - Top 30
• Treasury
• Tell a Friend

Articles: Submit New
• Articles: Topics
• Contact Us
• Community Forums

Members List
• Photo Albums
• PointBlank Ballistics
• PointBlank Online
• Privacy Policy
• Private Messages

Reloading Database
• State F&G Agencies
• Statistics
• Your Account

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

(Register)

Membership:

Latest: IPutMoInYoA

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 13131

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 414

BOT: 2

Total: 416

Who Is Where:

Visitors:
01: Your Account
02: Photo Albums
03: Your Account
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Home
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Your Account
11: Your Account
12: Forums
13: Your Account
14: Forums
15: Your Account
16: Forums
17: Home
18: Forums
19: Home
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Photo Albums
23: Your Account
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Photo Albums
27: Forums
28: Photo Albums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Your Account
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Your Account
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Photo Albums
41: Photo Albums
42: Forums
43: Forums
44: Your Account
45: Your Account
46: Photo Albums
47: Photo Albums
48: Your Account
49: Photo Albums
50: Photo Albums
51: Your Account
52: Forums
53: Your Account
54: Photo Albums
55: Forums
56: Home
57: Photo Albums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Home
62: Forums
63: Your Account
64: Photo Albums
65: Photo Albums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Photo Albums
69: Photo Albums
70: Your Account
71: Forums
72: Photo Albums
73: Forums
74: Your Account
75: Forums
76: Your Account
77: Your Account
78: Forums
79: Your Account
80: Your Account
81: Photo Albums
82: Home
83: Forums
84: Your Account
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Photo Albums
92: Photo Albums
93: Photo Albums
94: Your Account
95: Photo Albums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Home
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Your Account
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Your Account
105: Your Account
106: Your Account
107: Forums
108: Photo Albums
109: Your Account
110: Your Account
111: Photo Albums
112: Photo Albums
113: Forums
114: Your Account
115: Home
116: Forums
117: Your Account
118: Forums
119: Your Account
120: Your Account
121: Forums
122: Your Account
123: Your Account
124: Forums
125: Your Account
126: Your Account
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Photo Albums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Your Account
133: Forums
134: Forums
135: Forums
136: Forums
137: Forums
138: Your Account
139: Forums
140: Your Account
141: Photo Albums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Your Account
146: Forums
147: Your Account
148: Forums
149: Home
150: Forums
151: Forums
152: Photo Albums
153: Forums
154: Your Account
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Photo Albums
159: Photo Albums
160: Your Account
161: Your Account
162: Forums
163: Photo Albums
164: Forums
165: Forums
166: Forums
167: Photo Albums
168: Forums
169: Your Account
170: Your Account
171: Your Account
172: Forums
173: Photo Albums
174: Forums
175: Forums
176: Forums
177: Forums
178: Your Account
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Your Account
185: Forums
186: Photo Albums
187: Home
188: Forums
189: Your Account
190: Your Account
191: Your Account
192: Your Account
193: Forums
194: Photo Albums
195: Your Account
196: Home
197: Forums
198: News
199: Your Account
200: Your Account
201: Forums
202: Forums
203: Forums
204: Your Account
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Photo Albums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
213: Photo Albums
214: Photo Albums
215: Forums
216: Your Account
217: Your Account
218: Forums
219: Forums
220: Home
221: Forums
222: Photo Albums
223: Forums
224: Your Account
225: Your Account
226: Your Account
227: Forums
228: Forums
229: Photo Albums
230: Photo Albums
231: Photo Albums
232: Forums
233: Your Account
234: Forums
235: News
236: Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Forums
240: Photo Albums
241: Photo Albums
242: Your Account
243: Forums
244: Forums
245: Forums
246: Forums
247: Your Account
248: Your Account
249: Photo Albums
250: Forums
251: Forums
252: Your Account
253: Photo Albums
254: Photo Albums
255: Forums
256: Your Account
257: Home
258: Your Account
259: Forums
260: Forums
261: Photo Albums
262: Forums
263: Photo Albums
264: Photo Albums
265: Forums
266: Forums
267: Your Account
268: Photo Albums
269: Forums
270: Forums
271: Forums
272: Forums
273: Photo Albums
274: Forums
275: Home
276: Forums
277: Photo Albums
278: Your Account
279: Forums
280: Photo Albums
281: Your Account
282: Forums
283: Forums
284: Photo Albums
285: Photo Albums
286: Your Account
287: Photo Albums
288: Forums
289: Forums
290: Your Account
291: Photo Albums
292: Forums
293: Your Account
294: Forums
295: Your Account
296: Forums
297: Photo Albums
298: Your Account
299: Your Account
300: Home
301: Home
302: Forums
303: Photo Albums
304: Forums
305: Your Account
306: Your Account
307: Forums
308: Forums
309: Forums
310: Your Account
311: Your Account
312: Photo Albums
313: Tell a Friend
314: Home
315: Forums
316: Your Account
317: Forums
318: Forums
319: Forums
320: Home
321: Photo Albums
322: Forums
323: Your Account
324: Your Account
325: Forums
326: Home
327: Your Account
328: Forums
329: Forums
330: Forums
331: Your Account
332: Forums
333: Your Account
334: Home
335: Photo Albums
336: Forums
337: News
338: Forums
339: Forums
340: Forums
341: Forums
342: Forums
343: Forums
344: Your Account
345: Home
346: Forums
347: Forums
348: Photo Albums
349: Photo Albums
350: Your Account
351: Photo Albums
352: Forums
353: Photo Albums
354: Photo Albums
355: Photo Albums
356: Home
357: Photo Albums
358: Your Account
359: Forums
360: Forums
361: Forums
362: Forums
363: Your Account
364: Photo Albums
365: Forums
366: Photo Albums
367: Forums
368: Forums
369: Forums
370: Forums
371: Photo Albums
372: Forums
373: Your Account
374: Forums
375: Forums
376: Home
377: Forums
378: Home
379: Your Account
380: Photo Albums
381: Forums
382: Forums
383: Your Account
384: Photo Albums
385: Your Account
386: Photo Albums
387: Forums
388: Forums
389: Photo Albums
390: Forums
391: Your Account
392: Forums
393: Forums
394: Your Account
395: Forums
396: Home
397: Photo Albums
398: Forums
399: Forums
400: Photo Albums
401: Forums
402: Your Account
403: Forums
404: Your Account
405: Your Account
406: Photo Albums
407: Forums
408: Forums
409: Forums
410: Photo Albums
411: Your Account
412: Forums
413: Home
414: Photo Albums

BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats

Photo Albums

• Albums: 308
• Pictures: 2452
  · Views: 824588
  · Votes: 1316
  · Comments: 86

Ruger 77 Compact in .260 Remington

In spring 2005 I acquired a Ruger 77 Mark II Compact chambered in .260 Remington. I gave a lot of thought to this rifle and handled it at several gun shows before I finally broke down and bought it. There were several considerations in my choice. I wanted a small, fairly light weight rifle that I could use for deer and maybe varmints too. I wanted it to be pretty weather resistant. I also wanted a cartridge that I felt would cleanly kill deer but not have quite as much recoil as my .280 Remington. I’ll try to explain my thinking as I describe the rifle and cartridge.

First, let’s discuss the rifle. I had decided that I wanted a stainless steel action and barrel with a laminated stock to make it a bit more weather proof than my wood stocked .280. I know that a synthetic stock is even more weather resistant but I just like the looks and weight of the laminated stocks better. I’m trying to walk a fine line between “light for carry” and “heavy to absorb recoil”. I wanted a compact rifle that my daughters could use comfortably should I ever con them into hunting with me. I had narrowed my choice down to a Remington Model 7 or the Ruger. In the end I never saw a Remington exactly like I wanted but I kept bumping into this little Ruger at the local gun shows.

The Ruger 77 Mark II Compact is all stainless with a gray and black laminated stock. This is a rather small rifle. It has a 16.5” barrel and is 35.5” long overall. Length of pull is 12.5”, a bit shorter than usual. This length will be easy for my younger daughter to handle as she is only about 5’ 1” tall. It weighs 6.25 pounds without a scope. Magazine capacity with the .260 Remington cartridges is four rounds. It has a three position safety that I really like. The safety lever moves horizontally. The first position, forward, is “fire”. The second position, middle, is “safe” but you can still operate the bolt for loading or unloading. In the third position, back, the rifle is “safe” and the bolt is locked closed.

One of the concerns I had was whether the rifle could handle the heavier bullets in this caliber. I like the option of a “heavy for caliber” bullet for hunting. Early reports I saw on the .260 rifles said that they wouldn’t stabilize heavy bullets because the twist rate was too slow. This Ruger has a twist of 1 turn in 8 inches, which is faster than earlier .260s and I think faster than the 6.5x55mm Swedish Mauser. It looked like this would work for the 160 grain bullets that I wanted to try.

I added a Simmons AETEC 2.8-to-10X scope to the rifle. Ruger’s built in mounts always make this an easy job. I did have this scope mounted on “Ol’ Splintermaker”, my Winchester Model 70. The Simmons has a short tube though, and I never did like the way it fit the long action Win 70. However it fits the short action Ruger perfectly. The optics are bright and clear and the zoom range gives me what I need for short range woods hunting or long range varmints. With the scope mounted the rifle weighs 7.5 pounds.

Now let's talk about the cartridge. The .260 Remington is part of the .308 Winchester case family, along with the .243 Winchester, 7mm-08 and .358 Winchester. It was introduced in 1997. Initially it was intended as a target round, taking advantage of the high ballistic coefficients that the 6.5mm bullet have. The “useful case capacity” is 3.32 cubic centimeters. The .264 bullets are available in weights from 85 to 160 grains. The Lee manual gives velocities up to 3340 fps for the 85 grain bullets and 2595 fps for the 160s. I know that a lot of folks use a .243 Winchester for deer but I wanted something that would fire a heavier bullet. Blame it on all those books I read about African hunting. The heaviest .243s are only 105 grains so the .260 gives me a lot more to play with.

To get ready for shooting I placed an order to Midway for Hornady dies and Remington brass. I picked the Hornady 129 grain SST and the Hornady 160 grain round nose bullets for initial testing. I had just bought a pound of Hodgdon H4831SC so I thought I’d try that first. CCI 200 primers completed the first batches of loads. One aspect of the loads that I looked at was the pressure vs. the velocity. I wanted to try some loads that showed a lower pressure to see if I could reduce muzzle blast by any noticeable level.

All cases were sized full length and trimmed to the same length. Case mouths and flash holes were deburred. Every powder charge was weighed, especially after I realized that the powder wouldn’t meter very well through my measure. All of the charges were about at the “Starting Load” level. Bullets were seated a bit long, just short of the lands.

I hit a snag when I started loading the 160 grain round noses. I always run that first cartridge that I finish through the gun before continuing, to make sure it chambers OK. Although it chambered fine it wouldn’t feed worth a flip. In fact not at all! This Hornady has a VERY blunt nose and it kept catching on the edge of the chamber. I decided to load five just to see if they would stabilize. I checked some catalogs and saw that Sierra has a 160 grain “semi pointed” bullet that I might try later. An article I read in “Rifle” magazine said that the premium 140 grain bullets penetrated better than the 160s anyway, due to bullet construction. I’ll have to rethink my strategy here.

The 129 grain SST bullets fed fine. Since I had some cases prepped that I didn’t use for the 160 grain bullets I used them to load some of the SSTs over Hodgdon Varget powder. Varget is supposed to be pretty accurate in this family of cartridges.

I finally got to the range with my new toy. Although the temperature was comfortable the wind was blowing pretty good, swirling through the valley where the range is located. There were some thunderstorms moving into the area. Every gust of wind brought clouds of dust, pollen and debris onto the range. I decided to go ahead and shoot some 10 shot groups at 100 yards to check the velocities because I wasn’t sure when I’d get the next chance. Because we were trying to beat the storm I didn’t let the barrel cool between shots or groups.

The first loads tried were the 129 grain SSTs over Varget. My Chrony showed an average velocity of 2438 ft/sec. Extreme spread was 86 ft/sec and the standard deviation was 23.8 ft/sec. The group size was right about 2” and interestingly enough almost made a “+” sign on the target. I was disappointed with these starting loads and wonder if raising the charge will improve the accuracy.

The next loads tested were the 129 grain SSTs over H4831SC. These averaged 2510 ft/sec with an extreme spread of 64 ft/sec and a standard deviation of 21.3 ft/sec. If I throw out the called flyer I have a 1.4” group. With the flyer it opened up to 3”.

Finally I tried the five 160 grain Hornady RNs over H4831SC. I had to drop each one into the chamber. Average velocity was 2263 ft/sec with an extreme spread of 21 ft/sec and a standard deviation of only 7.8 ft/sec. Figures huh? Naturally they also made the best group, 1.1”. My shooting buddy asked “How fast can you load those one at a time?” I noticed that all three loads shot to the same point of impact at 100 yards.

Shooting from the bench I found that the rifle was very comfortable, even with the shorter stock. The trigger was decent and the recoil was fairly mild. Calculated recoil energy for the .260 was 12.3 ft-lb compared to 18.8 for my .280. I was also shooting a Winchester 94 .44 Magnum carbine that day and the .260 was much more enjoyable. My buddy fired a few rounds too and liked the way the rifle handled. I couldn’t really tell any difference in the muzzle blast between the H4831SC loads and the slightly lower pressure Varget loads. At a later range session I had a young lady in her teens shoot some of the 140 grain bullet loads and she really liked the rifle too.

I was pretty pleased with the H4831SC loads, especially because they were almost literally the first shot out of the gun, there hadn’t been any load tweaking yet. Powder charges were pretty safe so I thought I could increase the velocity some, although 2500 ft/sec out of a 16.5” barrel isn’t too bad. On a later trip to the range I was able to try some maximum loads of the same powder with the same bullet and gained a whopping 30 ft/sec. Group size was the same. Apparently the short barrel is doing about all it can with this combination.

After I started working on this review “Shooting Times” ran two articles, one on the .260 Remington cartridge and another on the Ruger 77 “Frontier” rifle. The “Frontier” is the same rifle I have with the addition of a rib in front of the action that allows a “Scout scope” to be mounted. You can find these in the May 2005 issue.

In the fall of 2005 I finally did some hunting with the rifle. I really liked the way the gun handled in the woods and up in a tree stand. A small whitetail buck became the first live target. One of the Hornady 129 grain SSTs placed behind his left shoulder at about 40 yards turned his heart/lung area to mush and he ran about 50 yards. The only exit wound was found by the BB sized drop of blood on his off-side shoulder.

Over all I am very pleased with my purchase. In fact I like the handling so much that I hope to buy a Ruger Frontier chambered for .338 Federal for use as another “woods gun”. I think the Compact in .260 Rem. would be an excellent rifle for smaller shooters while not giving up much in performance on medium sized game. It is exactly what I hoped it would be as far as something my girls could shoot comfortably. However, they haven’t shot it yet and, you know, I never really told them that I’d bought it for them…

Posted by Pumpkinslinger on Saturday, October 27, 2007 (21:22:50) (23535 reads) [ Administration ]