HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: MDostie49
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12704

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 72
BOT: 2
Total: 74
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Photo Albums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Photo Albums
14: Forums
15: Your Account
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Photo Albums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Home
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Your Account
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Forums
43: Your Account
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Forums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Your Account
57: Forums
58: Your Account
59: Forums
60: Your Account
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Your Account
66: Photo Albums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Forums
  BOT:
01: Forums
02: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2371
  · Views: 537890
  · Votes: 1312
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol)
Discussions related to Guns and Firearms
Go to page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3718
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

Ballistically speaking the 38 Spc.+P and 9mm are so close that they are indistinguishable. If you think the 9mm is so good then why have all police forces dropped the 38 Spc from use? The only advantage the 9mm has is more (ineffective) rounds before reloading. Look at the velocities that you get from your guns - no difference at all.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7872
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

PaulS wrote:
why have all police forces dropped the 38 Spc from use?

To go with 9mm semi-autos that carries more than twice the rounds! Where are you getting the 38 +P is ballistically the same as a 9mm. Winchester 38 +P 125gr JPH was listed as 945 fps at the muzzle. That is almost 300 fps slower than my 9mm and I'm not shooting +Ps.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3718
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

I loaded for both and got the highest velocity loads (published) for each caliber and tested them through my chronograph. If I printed them out without the header files you could not tell which was which.
My loads were worked up using the Hodgdon and Speer manuals and tested on the same days over a period of weeks at the local police range.
Bullet weights tested were 110gr, 124/125gr, 140gr. I also used some 9mm bullets in the 38 that had higher velocities - attributed to the looser fit in the barrel. Some 38 rounds were faster by less than the Mean average deviation and some of the 9mm round were faster by less than the average mean deviation. They at least as close as two guns of the same caliber.
The reason I ran the test was the velocity similarities in the Speer manual were so close that I wanted to see if it was a real correlation or just a test abberation. Turned out the similarities are consistant with the ballistics of the calibers. 38 Spc.+P and 9mm are ballistic equivalents.
As far as I know there are no 9mm+p loads - none show in my manuals.

In my old (1978) Winchester manual they list the 100 gr 9mm at 1220 with 231 and 1210 with 630.
It also lists the 110gr 38 Spc+P at 1130 with 231 and 1220 with 630.

Comparing the 115gr 9mm at 1125 with both powders and the 125 gr 38 Spc +P at 1070 with 231 and 1150 with 630 shows this is not limited to just the two manuals I used.

I looked this info up because you mentioned winchester in your post.
Paul

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7872
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:47 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

So you ran your handloads hotter than Winchester loads their production 38 +P.

For all you ".45 ACP is King" worshipers, answer this questions. Would you rather be shot with a 9mm than a .45?

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein


Last edited by slimjim on Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:05 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
For all you ".45 ACP is King" worshipers, answer this questions. Would you rather be shoot with a 9mm than a .45?

I take it that you meant shot rather than shoot? Very Happy Well I'd rather shoot a 45 and as far as getting shot by either, I'll pass. Laughing

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7872
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:22 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

Thanks OV1, corrected.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
stovepipe
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 4877
Location: Pine, Az.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:50 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
So you ran your handloads hotter than Winchester loads their production 38 +P.

For all you ".45 ACP is King" worshipers, answer this questions. Would you rather be shot with a 9mm than a .45?

I won't get any volunteers that skoff at my 2" .38spl loads either. Funny how that works. Laughing

I won't even start the long off topic diatribe about small/light/fast vs. big/slow/heavy. ME is overrated and most fixate on speed, ME & ballistics gel. Same has been debunked over and over. The incapacitation value of a larger diameter defensive projectile and it's permanent wound cavity wins every time, it's simple phyisics. There's no replacement for displacement. Bigger is better.
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2984
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:50 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

stovepipe wrote:
it's simple phyisics. There's no replacement for displacement. Bigger is better.

Cheers Agreed.

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7872
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

stovepipe wrote:
There's no replacement for displacement. Bigger is better.

When asked why the sheriff carred a .45, he replied "because they don't make a .46."

However, when I'm in shorts and a T-shirt in hot summer weather, pistol size is a more important factor to me to achieve good concealment. 9mm are my choice. When its winter and I wear a jacket, a full-size pistol in a larger caliber is easier to conceal.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Pumpkinslinger
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Posts: 4551
Location: NC foothills

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

If we're talking about shooting round lead balls from a muzzle loader then yes, bigger is better. With the limitations of black powder the only way to get more energy is to go bigger. With modern bullets that argument isn't so clear cut.

_________________
Mike

"I ain't no better than anyone else, and there ain't no one better than me!" Ma Kettle

Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
stovepipe
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 4877
Location: Pine, Az.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:58 am    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

I agree Slimmers! That's why they make the Officers model! Laughing


Pumpkinslinger wrote:
[If we're talking about shooting round lead balls] from a muzzle loader then yes, bigger is better. With the limitations of black powder the only way to get more energy is to go bigger. [With modern bullets that argument isn't so clear cut.]

My point was regarding defensive pistol bullets as stated. And it is clear cut.

Like kind/make bullet in .355 and .452, the larger caliber expands more thus creating a larger permanent cavity. Incapcitating a threat requires one of two things- blood loss or nervous system disruption. The bigger the hole the better your chances of same.

One can acheive a similar result with [more faster smaller lighter projectiles] (on soft targets), or, with [less slower larger heavier ones].
Toss a car door or glass in there and the 9 fairs poorly.

The 9mm Parabellum has been tweaked to deaath over the past 30 years trying to make it more effective at stopping threats and it simply cant hold a candle to the 45ACP no matter how fast, slow or otherwise they push the dozens of projectiles they've brewed up for it.
The 9 is good....the 45 is better.
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3718
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Velocity vs Barrel Length (Pistol) Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
So you ran your handloads hotter than Winchester loads their production 38 +P?

Not sure what you mean Slim??
Those loads were taken from the Winchester manual and they compared lighter 9mm bullets to slightly heavier 38 Spl. +P loads. The 38+P shooting bullets of the same weight (or slightly heavier in this case) are faster than 9mm both in the manual and at the range using listed loads. No need to load hotter than listed loads. (I rarely go up to max loadings in my reloading)
Paul

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Gun & Firearm Discussions
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.