HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: eeschunerronni
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12471

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 212
BOT: 4
Total: 216
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Photo Albums
12: Forums
13: Photo Albums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Photo Albums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Photo Albums
21: Photo Albums
22: Your Account
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Photo Albums
28: Photo Albums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Photo Albums
33: Photo Albums
34: Photo Albums
35: Forums
36: Photo Albums
37: Forums
38: Photo Albums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Your Account
42: Forums
43: Photo Albums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Photo Albums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Photo Albums
53: Forums
54: Photo Albums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Statistics
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Forums
66: Forums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Forums
71: Forums
72: Photo Albums
73: Photo Albums
74: Photo Albums
75: Forums
76: Photo Albums
77: Photo Albums
78: Forums
79: Photo Albums
80: Photo Albums
81: Forums
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Statistics
86: Photo Albums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Forums
90: Your Account
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: News
95: Home
96: Home
97: News
98: Photo Albums
99: Home
100: Forums
101: Your Account
102: Photo Albums
103: Forums
104: Forums
105: Statistics
106: Forums
107: Photo Albums
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Forums
114: Forums
115: Forums
116: Forums
117: Forums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Statistics
122: Photo Albums
123: Photo Albums
124: Photo Albums
125: Photo Albums
126: Photo Albums
127: Forums
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Your Account
131: Forums
132: Photo Albums
133: Forums
134: Home
135: Forums
136: Your Account
137: Your Account
138: Photo Albums
139: Photo Albums
140: Photo Albums
141: Photo Albums
142: Forums
143: Forums
144: Forums
145: Forums
146: Your Account
147: Photo Albums
148: Photo Albums
149: Forums
150: Forums
151: Photo Albums
152: Forums
153: Forums
154: Photo Albums
155: Forums
156: Forums
157: Forums
158: Photo Albums
159: Photo Albums
160: Forums
161: Forums
162: Forums
163: Forums
164: Photo Albums
165: Photo Albums
166: Photo Albums
167: Photo Albums
168: Forums
169: Your Account
170: Forums
171: Your Account
172: Forums
173: Photo Albums
174: Home
175: Photo Albums
176: Photo Albums
177: Photo Albums
178: Forums
179: Forums
180: Forums
181: Forums
182: Forums
183: Forums
184: Forums
185: Forums
186: Forums
187: Forums
188: Forums
189: Forums
190: Forums
191: Forums
192: Photo Albums
193: Photo Albums
194: Photo Albums
195: Photo Albums
196: Photo Albums
197: Photo Albums
198: Photo Albums
199: Forums
200: Photo Albums
201: Forums
202: Photo Albums
203: Forums
204: Photo Albums
205: Forums
206: Forums
207: Forums
208: Forums
209: Forums
210: Forums
211: Forums
212: Forums
  BOT:
01: Photo Albums
02: Forums
03: Your Account
04: Your Account

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 304
 Pictures: 2340
  · Views: 296223
  · Votes: 1302
  · Comments: 85
 

Support our Advertisers

Ballistic Coefficient
Help / Support / How-to's / Discussion related to PointBlank Software and External Ballistics in general
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » PointBlank Software

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
English Mike
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 1150
Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:18 pm    Post subject: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

I note that several manufacturers are now giving two differing figures for a bullet's BC: G1 & G7.
Berger is one & they have an explanation here that makes a lot of sense.

My question is: Will this affect the accuracy of trajectory projections when using PointBlank?
Back to top
View user's profile
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7021
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

there is also different figures for different speeds......you can end up chasing your tail if shooting really long as figure will change as speed drops.

aim and shoot . dont try for range of more than say 350 yards and its all just gobbledegook anyway LOL.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7128
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

English Mike, what bullet are you trying to use? I've done some BC testing to check between actual and advertising.

www.huntingnut.com/ind...=ballistic

For those not familiar with G7, it is better optimized for modern low-drag bullets. G1 and G7 are distinctly different values and require different algorithms to generate trajectories.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
English Mike
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 1150
Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

slimjim wrote:
English Mike, what bullet are you trying to use? I've done some BC testing to check between actual and advertising.

www.huntingnut.com/ind...=ballistic

For those not familiar with G7, it is better optimized for modern low-drag bullets. G1 and G7 are distinctly different values and require different algorithms to generate trajectories.

Moly coated .243 Lapua Scenar 90gr which definitely resemble the G7 profile (boat tail, long ogive, open tip).

Using the G7 profile gives a lower BC than the G1, which confuses the heck out of me.

ETA I just read through all the posts in your link & that helps a great deal.
I have at least 10 different varieties of .277 bullets sitting in Albuquerque if you ever want any more to play with, though I can't tell you what exactly for another eight weeks, which is how long it'll be till I'm out there again.
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7128
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

English Mike wrote:
Using the G7 profile gives a lower BC than the G1, which confuses the heck out of me.

The G7 BC can't be used in typical ballistic calculators designed for G1 inputs. I don't know if PointBlank handles G7 BCs? If it doesn't I would use the calculator on the Berger or Applied Ballistics websites. They are compatible with G7 inputs.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
Vince
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 13134
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

Mike, unless you are looking for Bench Rest accuracy I tend to agree with Elvis. Pick a projectile that you think will meet your needs and try it out. If it doesn't perform as you hoped, or you can't find a load that works, then look at a different projectile.

I love what Slim does with his testing, but it goes beyond anything I will ever need or do, however it 'scratches an itch' that Slim needs to scratch, and that's great. I think that with the multitude of different projectiles on the market today, the average shooter/hunter gets confused and too wrapped around the axles with advertised claims. Said shooter then gets discouraged when they don't always achieve those claims.

I look at my target species, look at a type (HP, SP etc) and weight of projectile to humanely harvest that species then develop a load that will give me minute of critter. Anything beyond that, I find, creates confusion leading to not trusting your loads.

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 7021
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

very sage words there Vince....very sage indeed, Scratch Scratch are you sure you not related to Gelandagans lot way back somewhere???? Very Happy

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3151
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

PointBlank is based on a G1 table. I've rarely had people ask for G7 based computation, but not enough to justify the work to implement it.

Plus.... Sierra uses THREE different BC's for their bullets, depending on the velocity range you shoot them in. Its all pretty technical, all a Ballistics Calculator helps with is giving a representation for a theoretical trajectory.


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Vince
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 13134
Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

Elvis wrote:
very sage words there Vince....very sage indeed, Scratch Scratch are you sure you not related to Gelandagans lot way back somewhere???? Very Happy

Haha Haha anything is possible in this day and age mate.

I see Dallan has answered your query, so sorry if I have hijacked your thread he of Pomgolia.

_________________
Cheers, Vince Cheers

Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.

"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done)
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7128
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

DallanC wrote:
Sierra uses THREE different BC's for their bullets, depending on the velocity range you shoot them in.

During my BC testing I found several bullets whose BC (G1) noticeably changed when tested at different speeds. It appropriate for the bullet, a G7 BC provides better drag/trajectory calculations over the more significant velocity change associated with long range shooting.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
DallanC
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 3151
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

Yea, the big problem is most mfgs dont give out a G7 based SD for their bullets. Everyone is too used to G1 values.


-DallanC
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
English Mike
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 1150
Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 3:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Ballistic Coefficient Reply with quote

I know real world shooting is ultimately the only way to know exactly how a bullet behaves from a particular firearm & I guess that's really the point: I'm looking for excuses to shoot more. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » PointBlank Software
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.