HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: DoninMontana
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12442

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 113
BOT: 4
Total: 117
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Forums
02: Home
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Forums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Home
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Home
22: Photo Albums
23: Your Account
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Photo Albums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Home
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Home
40: Forums
41: Home
42: Forums
43: Home
44: Forums
45: Home
46: Forums
47: Photo Albums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
52: Forums
53: Photo Albums
54: Forums
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Forums
61: Photo Albums
62: Your Account
63: Forums
64: Forums
65: Photo Albums
66: Photo Albums
67: Forums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Photo Albums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Forums
74: Forums
75: Forums
76: Home
77: Forums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Forums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Home
89: Forums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Photo Albums
97: Forums
98: Photo Albums
99: Forums
100: Forums
101: Forums
102: Photo Albums
103: Forums
104: Photo Albums
105: Forums
106: Forums
107: Your Account
108: Forums
109: Forums
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Forums
113: Photo Albums
  BOT:
01: Your Account
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 301
 Pictures: 2358
  · Views: 285157
  · Votes: 1297
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR?
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1033
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:21 am    Post subject: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

Let me start by saying this was a very small sample size and the statistical significance of these values can be argued six ways to Sunday. I am shooting this in the prone position with a sling and iron sights. No other support or optics.

I have always loaded AR competition loads (23.2 gr. of 8208XBR, LC brass, Wolf Primer) for rapid fire to about 2.255” oal. This load holds the 2 MOA 10 ring if not the 1 MOA X ring in a service rifle target easily if I do my job. A while back a fellow competitor said he ran a test and showed that if he seated shorter than published OAL to meet magazine length he had tighter rounder groups in the rapid fire stages of the match. I never gave it much thought as the conventional wisdom is that the 77 grain HPBT match were not sensitive to jump at all. Just load at mag length and shoot it. I know VLD secant ogive bullets are very picky for jump but these 77HPBT bullets are pretty robust and not picky at all Right? I thought I would run a quick and dirty test to see what OAL my new barrel “liked “ best.

I was shooting at 100 yards at an SR-1 target. I shot 10 shots with 2.250” OAL in the center of the target and had a 2.0” group as a control.
I then cranked on the iron sights and put 20 clicks left windage and +25 elevation on the gun. I fired five shots of the load seated to 2.260” OAL. The aiming point and sight picture was the same as my control group but the bullets printed in the upper right hand corner of the target out in the white scoring rings.

Next I came down 25 clicks and shot 2.250" group. This printed at the X ring level but in the white at 9:00. The 5 shot group at 2.250” was also 2.0”. So… the group size of a five shot group is representative of what a ten shot group is.

I then came down 18 (to dead bottom) and fired 2.240" OAL group which printed in the lower left corner of the scoring rings in the white.

I then added 43 up (18+25) and 40 clicks right to get to the upper right corner and the 2.230” group was fired.

Down 25 to mid-line of target on 3:00 side for 2.220” OAL.

Down 18 to dead bottom for 2.210” group.

The results are shown in the table below for all five shots and the best four out of the five.


COAL 5 shots Best 4
2.260 1.2 1.1
2.250 2.0 1.2
2.240 1.2 1.0
2.230 1.2 0.5
2.220 2.2 1.5
2.210 2.2 2.2

The two real short ones are clearly not as good as the others. The 2.250” is not bad, but not as good as the other three. 2.260 2.240 and 2.230 are about the same in 5 shot measurements. The 2.230 groups roundness was better and half the size for best 4.

In the end… given this small sample… All the top 4 are really about the same. BUT – I will be loading 2.235” just in case.

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Elvis
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 6932
Location: south island New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:28 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

hmmmmm, keep us informed.

_________________
You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers!
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7051
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

Dawgdad wrote:
... 20 clicks left ... +25 elevation .... down 25 clicks ... down 18 ... added 43 up (18+25) ... Down 25 ... Down 18 to dead bottom

Wow, glad I completed higher level math! I will to go through this again.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7051
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:42 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

Ok, caught my breath. Your rifle is doing pretty good. I've seen some report 2" variation in group size just due to COAL differences. COAL adjustment is the last step in load development that I perform to fine tune a load. Its particularly beneficial with Barnes TSX/TTSX bullets. They are even finding that Berger can benifit from benig further from the lands.

I just started a project on my 6.8mm AR to load up to 2.425" COAL. I modified my magazine and recievers to accomodate this. Most 6.8 bullets are way too far from the lands. I've already found much better accuracy. I've done this for hunting.

68forums.com/forums/sh...zine-COALs

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
dhc4ever
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 26, 2011
Posts: 2239
Location: Ipswich, Queensland Australia

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:04 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

Why the long throat on tne AR? You would think that with so many manufacturers someone would make a barrel to remedy this..

_________________
Pete

Dont do anything you wont like explaining to the paramedics..............
Back to top
View user's profile
PaulS
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3382
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

The military specifies a long throat in order to get the higher velocity and handle the higher pressure loads. That is the main difference between a 5.56 chamber and the .223 chamber.

_________________
Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dawgdad
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Posts: 1033
Location: On the Prairie

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:38 am    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

My rifles have a 223 Wylde chamber which has a long throat too like the 5.56 to accommodate 80 grain bullets loaded longer than magazine length which are single loaded longer distance shooting. (600yds.)

_________________
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7051
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:34 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

dhc4ever wrote:
Why the long throat on tne AR? You would think that with so many manufacturers someone would make a barrel to remedy this..

I was addressing the issues with the 6.8mm SPC. Remington designed this cartridge but got the throat, primer size, and barrel twist wrong. The SPC II solves many of those issues and AR15Performance makes a 6.8 barrel with a shorter thoat because most of the .277 bullets used in the 6.8 have a shorter ogive than those used in the .270 Win.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
dhc4ever
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 26, 2011
Posts: 2239
Location: Ipswich, Queensland Australia

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:09 pm    Post subject: Re: OK Slim would you have expected this from an AR? Reply with quote

Well keep the info comming, you guys get to play with all the good toys, we all live vicariously through you lot since 1996 when most semi autos were banned. If you have a "genuine" reason and can jump through hoops like a trained seal, it can be done, but not easily for the general shooter.

_________________
Pete

Dont do anything you wont like explaining to the paramedics..............
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.