View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vince Site Admin
Joined: May 25, 2005 Posts: 15718 Location: Brisbane AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:25 am Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
From my time in the Army, I learned that the reason the military use FMJ is for purely humane reasons (courtesy of the Geneva Convention)...they don't always cause nasty nasty wounds, or as Suz says, they just poke a hole in things on their way through.
When I carried a pistol doing security work in Sydney's western suburbs (the Vietnamese and Lebanese stronghold) I carried a couple of different loads of bullets. In the 4" 686 S&W I carried, the cylinder had 125gn JHP. I also carried two speed-loaders, one with 125gn JHP bullets and the other with 158gn FN. I also carried an 18 round "wallet" in my pocket with nine rounds of each 125gn JHP and 158gn FN. The backup pistol I was supplied with was a Bernadelli 9mm Short (.380). A totally useless pistol that was loaded with FMJ bullets.
One thing I do like about pistol hollow point bullets is the HP is not a simply "pin hole" in the tip...it is a hollow cavity, which lends itself to easier expansion at pistol velocities, although as DS pointed out, it can clog with some mediums.
I hoped that I would never have to make use of even a single round, but with the "less than scientific", but relevant, testing I did on various mediums, I knew that I could rely on both of these rounds to do the job if needed.
Like Single Shot, (if I was allowed to carry) I would have nothing smaller than a .40 for the same reasons he outlines...mass and diameter, well proven stoppers.
_________________ Cheers, Vince
Illegitimi non carborundum
(Never let the bastards grind you down)
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God.
"Nulla Si Fa Senza Volonta."
(Without Commitment, Nothing Gets Done) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bushmaster Super Member
Joined: Jun 12, 2005 Posts: 11393 Location: Ava, Missouri
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:01 am Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
185 grain Hornady XTP over 7.6 grains of WSF. Launched from a Kimber UCC II .45 ACP at 850 fps (+/- a few).
Guess this will give rise to a few more comments. Oh yeh. Jacketed hollow points. If there is a chance to expand. Great!! If it doesn't expand the .45 ACP makes a big hole anyway.
_________________ I have one nerve left and yer standin' on it...
DEMOCRACY Two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch...
LIBERTY A well armed sheep contesting the outcome of the vote... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radar Super Member
Joined: Oct 01, 2008 Posts: 1109 Location: North Island New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
The Police here use federal Hydrashok 9mm and most bad guys shot once with that are pretty well down and out with a center mass hit.
I know what I'd use if I was able to. Instead I got the 12G Buckshot option.
_________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pumpkinslinger Super Member
Joined: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 5002 Location: NC foothills
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
There were several on the other site that carried FMJs, the basic reasons being along the lines of "less likely to jam" and "it doesn't make any difference".
_________________ Mike
"I ain't no better than anybody else, and there ain't nobody better than me!" Ma Kettle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulS Super Member
Joined: Feb 18, 2006 Posts: 4330 Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:32 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
There are two reasons for police to use hollow-points:
1. stopping power - which may be debatable.
2. it cuts down on ricochets.
Most of the police I shot with had a hard time keeping their rounds on a 2' x 2' target board at 25 yards. I don't get to shoot with the police here in Walla Walla because they use the range at the pen - no civilians allowed.
_________________ Paul
__________________
Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radar Super Member
Joined: Oct 01, 2008 Posts: 1109 Location: North Island New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:20 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
Thats rat-shit shooting, Im shitty if I cant group fist size at 30M punching paper. I can get that down to tennis ball with the new acog sights on our M4s at 50M. We're even being taught to shoot on the move- not stopping just putting accurate rounds down range whilst moving, even then I haven't gone off center mass of aim point, sure they spread a bit but theyre all stoppers.
_________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elvis Super Member
Joined: Jul 27, 2008 Posts: 9256 Location: south island New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
rat shit alright I can beat that with buck shot!!!!
_________________ You shot it You pluck it !
Them who eats the most duck eats the most feathers! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SingleShotLover Super Member
Joined: Dec 26, 2007 Posts: 1005 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:24 am Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
Whatever a person chooses to carry, we all need to be aware of the local and state laws. Some states (New Jersey for one) make it a felony to even possess hollow point ammunition.
_________________ If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!
The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.
SSL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aloysius Super Member
Joined: Nov 03, 2009 Posts: 2440 Location: B., Belgium
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:52 am Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
SSL, in our country private persons are also not allowed to use HP in a handgun, but it is allowed in a rifle. So these lever action in handgun calibers can be healphy when you walk close to the line...
Funny thing is that we are not allowed to use a FMJ for hunting, so when having a revolver and a lever action in the same caliber, we almost have to have both types of bullets (or go straight to the lead SWC and/or semi-jacketed with a lead nose.
And the use of bullets made of solid cupper or brass (as Barnes's) is still very misty and a lot will depend on your answers when you get control...
that's when you have so many rules that nobody knows them all anymore.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
English Mike Super Member
Joined: Jan 08, 2007 Posts: 1709 Location: Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:37 pm Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
I can shoot nice small groups with a 1911 off the bench but shooting off hand is a World different & if I can put all 8 shots from a magazine in the C zone of an IPSC target at 15yds I'm happy.
The only time I've carried defensively was on a mountainside covered in oak scrub & bear crap.
8 rounds of 230gr FMJ.
If it were intended for two footed predators, then hollow points all the way.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chambered221 Super Member
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 3455 Location: Lost for good !!!
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:15 am Post subject: Re: FMJs vs. JHPs for defensive handgun use? |
|
I've always advocated for jhp's in the bigger is better theory....... but shot placement determines the outcome !!!
Anyone who argues in favor of fmj's because they're less likely to jam needs to spend more time finding the confidence they should have.
_________________ Ask as many people needed, sooner or later your question will be answered the way you want it answered !!!
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
~George Washington |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|