HuntingNut
HuntingNut
   Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister
     
 

User Info

Welcome Anonymous


Membership:
Latest: 38$uper
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 12443

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 133
BOT: 5
Total: 138
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Albums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Forums
07: Photo Albums
08: Forums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Forums
13: Your Account
14: Photo Albums
15: Photo Albums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Photo Albums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Photo Albums
30: Forums
31: Photo Albums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Photo Albums
35: Your Account
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Home
41: News
42: Photo Albums
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Forums
49: Forums
50: Photo Albums
51: Forums
52: Photo Albums
53: Forums
54: Home
55: Forums
56: Forums
57: Forums
58: Forums
59: Forums
60: Reloading Database
61: Forums
62: Forums
63: Photo Albums
64: Photo Albums
65: Photo Albums
66: Forums
67: Photo Albums
68: Forums
69: Forums
70: Photo Albums
71: Forums
72: Forums
73: Home
74: Home
75: Forums
76: Forums
77: Photo Albums
78: Forums
79: Forums
80: Forums
81: Forums
82: Photo Albums
83: Forums
84: Forums
85: Forums
86: Forums
87: Forums
88: Forums
89: Photo Albums
90: Forums
91: Forums
92: Forums
93: Forums
94: Forums
95: Forums
96: Forums
97: Forums
98: Forums
99: Forums
100: Photo Albums
101: Forums
102: Forums
103: Forums
104: Photo Albums
105: Forums
106: Your Account
107: Forums
108: Forums
109: Home
110: Forums
111: Forums
112: Home
113: Forums
114: Photo Albums
115: Your Account
116: Forums
117: Photo Albums
118: Forums
119: Forums
120: Forums
121: Forums
122: Forums
123: Forums
124: Forums
125: Forums
126: Forums
127: Your Account
128: Forums
129: Forums
130: Forums
131: Forums
132: Forums
133: Photo Albums
  BOT:
01: Home
02: Forums
03: Your Account
04: Forums
05: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
 

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 301
 Pictures: 2365
  · Views: 285431
  · Votes: 1297
  · Comments: 86
 

Support our Advertisers

CFE 223 First Impressions
Discussion regarding the reloading of ammunition and tuning of loads for accuracy
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MacD
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:40 am    Post subject: CFE 223 First Impressions Reply with quote

I have just finished my first round of loading with CFE 223, Hodgdon's newest powder made for the 223 and of course well suited for the 308 Win. Here are my first impressions.

Here is the push from the Hodgdon site:

Introduced in January 2012, this versatile spherical rifle propellant incorporates in its formula CFE, Copper Fouling Eraser. This ingredient, originally used in military propellant, greatly deters copper fouling. It contributes to longer periods of top accuracy with less barrel cleaning time. Being a spherical powder, metering is superbly accurate. CFE 223 yields top velocities in many cartridges such as the 204 Ruger, 223 Remington/5.56mm NATO, 22-250 Remington and the 308 Winchester/7.62mm NATO, plus many, many more. Match, Varmint and AR shooters will love this one!

Handling:
This is a fine powder and it gets everywhere. No leakage from my powder measure but the slightest tap and it would leap out of the case. It was a bit sticky in the funnel and the slightest misalignment of funnel to case and powder would leak through the gap. The bottom of the top seal in the powder canister was covered with powder and when I pulled it back this powder went everywhere. Seems like it is more prone to static cling. Lesson learned to tap canister cover before opening.

Measuring:
Excellent metering. I weigh every charge on an electronic scale and only one in 50 was slightly under and one slightly over (less than 0.1 grain judging from trickle in and out). This was probably my timing rather than the powder or the measure.

Velocity Spread:
Unfortunately I was unable to use my chrono as a misty rain was falling. However all 10 charges (5 rounds each) resulted in near MOA accuracy and three loads (25.2, 26.0 and 26.2) resulted in groups that could be covered by a penny. I am thinking that this powder has to be consistent to allow that level of accuracy. I believe with a bit of fine tuning it can do better. BTW all were CCI 400, FED Brass (FL sized) and Hornady 60 grain Varmint (#2275) which is a hollow point, flat based hunting bullet and seated at 2.250 OAL.

Cleaning:
This is one of if not the cleanest powder I have used in my 223. The spent casings when cleaned in my ultrasonic cleaner with new solution left little residue in the water. Fifty rounds is hardly a good test of bore residue/fouling but a single wet patch followed by a dry left the barrel shining.

General:
I like this powder. I am going to repeat the three best loads and chrono the velocities. I stuck with the spec OAL but I will try a bit longer and see how this affects accuracy. I am also going to try this powder with 168 grain A-Max's in my 308. If others are using it I would like to hear their impressions/experience.

_________________
La a'Blair s'math n Cairdean
(Friends are good on the day of battle)
Back to top
View user's profile
Ominivision1
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 2985
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:52 pm    Post subject: Re: CFE 223 First Impressions Reply with quote

Interesting, the Ramshot TAC line of powder as well as Alliant RL-15 have been available for a few years before with the anti copper fouling before Hodgdon's powder became available, but no big advertising like Hodgdon's powder.

I've tried them except the Hodgdon version, both powders I mentioned above burn clean and meter well and I must say the RL-15 for the 223 is a little bit cleaner burning. On the other hand it is the BS that the powder manufactures say their test loads Speeds (fps) is the truth where in my book their speeds for the given bullet or powder are not real world and only a marketers dream.

_________________
Regards

Limitations are but boundaries created inside our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Arron
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Nov 20, 2006
Posts: 350
Location: Cen.Iowa, by way of SWIowa

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:13 pm    Post subject: Re: CFE 223 First Impressions Reply with quote

They use "special" LONG barrels to test the powders with I am told or I have read. I am going to load some 75gr A-MAX's for my dad for his AR to give him for his birthday in about 10 days give or take. Last he shot these he said they were GREAT performers. I am using right near 22Gr Of RAMSHot TAC. Rifle seemsto really like 'em so I see no need to change anything. And yes loading to a total length of 2,24 as per the tech at Hornady I talked to on the phone.

_________________
What do I know: I am just a line animal.
Back to top
View user's profile
slimjim
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: May 16, 2009
Posts: 7057
Location: Fort Worth TX

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:39 am    Post subject: Re: CFE 223 First Impressions Reply with quote

keep us posted, MacD. I'm very interested in your results, including how temperature stable it is.

_________________
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." - Theodore Roosevelt

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile
SingleShotLover
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 938
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: CFE 223 First Impressions Reply with quote

I have been trying CFE223 powder for a while and, so far, I'm impressed. I have been using it in my .17s, .223s, and 22/250 with good results. Do be careful to stay under maximum for any caliber when using this powder because it seems to be a little "hot". Maximum for the .17 Remington using a 20-grain VMAX is listed as 27.4 grains, but anything over 27 grains is causing a very slight flattening of the primers in my rifles. Even stopping at 27.0 grains, my loads are still clocking just under 4,400 fps (4,387 fps average for 10-shot strings corrected for 15' from the muzzle) and accuracy is impressive.

The same can be said of my .223 and 22/250 loads. I am hitting the velocities listed for maximum loads using less than maximum charges. This isn't too unusual in these rifles since they all wear 26" barrels and Hodgdon's test rifles are listed as 24". It still bears repeating that a person needs to start low and work up carefully, especially with a small cased cartridge like the .17 Remington.

I haven't shot enough yet to determine if the anti-copper fouling really works, but the bores do seem to look cleaner after shooting. Maybe just wishful thinking!

_________________
If you can't hit it with one, you probably can't with two either!

The biggest problem with a closed mind is that it never seems to come with a closed mouth.

SSL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Reloading Ammunition
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Advertisements
 


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of HuntingNut.com.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by HuntingNut.com
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.