Login or Register
HomeCommunity ForumsPhoto AlbumsRegister

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Latest: Bobbo68
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 1
Overall: 12631

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 51
BOT: 3
Total: 54
Who Is Where:
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums
04: Forums
05: Forums
06: Reloading Database
07: Forums
08: Photo Albums
09: Forums
10: Forums
11: Forums
12: Home
13: Forums
14: Forums
15: Forums
16: Forums
17: Forums
18: Forums
19: Forums
20: Forums
21: Forums
22: Forums
23: Forums
24: Forums
25: Forums
26: Forums
27: Forums
28: Forums
29: Forums
30: Forums
31: Forums
32: Forums
33: Forums
34: Forums
35: Forums
36: Forums
37: Forums
38: Forums
39: Forums
40: Forums
41: Forums
42: Home
43: Forums
44: Forums
45: Forums
46: Forums
47: Forums
48: Home
49: Forums
50: Forums
51: Forums
01: Forums
02: Forums
03: Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Coppermine Stats
Photo Albums
 Albums: 305
 Pictures: 2362
  · Views: 458387
  · Votes: 1311
  · Comments: 86

Support our Advertisers

Try this for size
Discussions run-amok, innane banter it all goes here
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Spam-O-Rama

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Super Member
Super Member

Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Posts: 1843
Location: Malta, Montana

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:37 pm    Post subject: Try this for size Reply with quote

THE WASHINGTON POST HITS OBAMA ----- Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timelythough. As I'm sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation forbeing extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the followingarticle about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a newsstory in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvioussocialist agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall†builtaround him by our liberal media.___________________________ I too have become disillusioned.By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San FranciscoExaminer) Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as aninscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of masshysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder,did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking hecould manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerfulmilitary, execute the world's most consequential job?
____________________________________________________- Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: usheredinto and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores alongthe way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a statelegislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of hisattention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished singleterm in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to hispresidential ambitions.
___________________________________ He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as alegislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: thewhite-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's"spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleagueand political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it alland asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed thequestion recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate whohad close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright andan unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. Butbecause Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom tohave hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if theywere a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass -held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.
___________________________________________ Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter whenhe was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said)"non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the firstblack president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon- affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in themotivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which aredesigned primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel goodabout themselves.
________________________________________________ Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on theback. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are notqualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and highdrop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail;liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflatedself-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes,racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of hisskin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, thennothing is.
_________________________________________ And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubledby his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama wastold he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental;he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record inIllinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at allin the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was goodenough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every timeObama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualificationsnonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.
___________________________________________ The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he hashis Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely thinkor speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's allwarmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everythingelse for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It isembarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, socomfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The manhas never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to actresponsibly?
____________________________________________ In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither thetemperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and onlywhen you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity makesense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office. Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark

Never argue with a stupid person ,cause they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. Mark Twwain
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Super Member
Super Member

Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 3556
Location: South-Eastern Washington - the State

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Try this for size Reply with quote

What are we going to be saying is the reason he got re-elected?
Why did the Republicans put Mitt Romney in as the "man to beat Obama"? He is not well liked by the middle-class, He seems to be uncomfortable with his wealth, He shows no empathy for those less fortunate than himself, and he has alienated himself from every ethnic group in the country. He has "plans" to get the country going again but won't talk about the particulars of it - if it even exists. The Republican party put him in as the nominee knowing that he has little chance of winning so they could be sure of a winner after four more years of Obama.
by then the public will be ready for another republican but the sad thing is that there may be no way to get the country back. when they fail in the first four years it will be the Libertarians that get elected. Too little too late. The national debt will be so large that we won't be able to pay the interest any longer and we will default on all that debt. The government will collapse and it will be left to us, the people, to institute a new government. I just hope it will be a real republic and not another "representative republic" like we have proved doesn't work.
Shoot! nobody even uses the term Republic anymore. They call the USA a democracy - when the constitution states plainly that it is the governments job to maintain a republic form of government to each of the many states.
Hasn't been done - the constitution is just a rag of paper without meaning to anyone in politics. It has little meaning to most of the citizens of the USA. The few it does have meaning to are branded as Extreme right wingers or crackpots.
I am looking forward to 2020 - 2024 - it will be an interesting time.

Speer, Lyman, Hodgdon, Sierra, and Hornady = reliable loading data
So and So's pages on the internet = NOT reliable loading data
Always check data against manuals
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index » Spam-O-Rama
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Valid CSS! Valid HTML 4.01!
Click to check if this page is realy HTML 4.01 compliant for speed :)

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2011 by
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy

.: Upgraded to DragonFly 9.2 by Dizfunkshunal :.