oops, I improper named the bill. It was the "Safer Community and Schools" bill.

Looks like it was designed to make you a criminal every time your gun left your house and was not in your specific possession. You couldn't put it in a friends car when you were moving to another apartment. You couldn't loan a buddy your shotgun to go duck hunting. Catch this, if there was two guns involved you would be prosecuted as a gun trafficking terrorist ... and never allowed to own a firearm again.

Don't you just love the deceit and the media that would not report it! :-((((



_________________________________________



Yesterday in meeting with Congressman Tom Reed, he mentioned that the one big reason the gun bill was defeated was that there was "Much in it, not reported by the main stream media, that many congressmen and senators did not like."This forwarded memo below might explain at least part of the problems---Once again the main stream media selectively reports what serves their agenda. Because they use the terms common sense and reasonable doesn�t make it so.


Background checks reasonable, I think not.



The "most popular" part of the defeated-but-sure-to-come back Senate gun control bill (background checks) sounds like a good idea at first but is more restrictive than anyone anticipated and will have significant unintended consequences.


There is a huge push to get it through Congress before the public has a chance to consider its contents.

Common activities that we take for granted will become federal crimes. These are not irresponsible exaggerations. Please take a moment to review the requirements of the bill.

********************************!!!!!!!

Here are a few examples of the restrictions in the bill:

EXAMPLE #1
Loaning your buddy a shotgun for a duck hunting trip will be considered a transfer. If the following requirements are not met, YOU HAVE BOTH COMMITTED A FEDERAL CRIME.
1. He must have already purchased his hunting license
2. Season is already open (and will not close before he returns it)
3. He cannot travel with the firearm through a county where season is not yet open or any area where hunting is prohibited and certainly not across a state line.
He CANNOT stop by your house on the day before season opens, pick up the shot gun, go to the sporting goods store to buy a license and shells then drive out to the hunting lease. In this scenario, YOU BOTH WOULD HAVE COMMITTED MULTIPLE FEDERAL CRIMES, YOUR WEAPONS WILL BE FORFEITED AND YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR RIGHT TO BUY OR OWN A FIREARM.
EXAMPLE #2
It appears that only you may relocate your weapons. If your weapon leaves your home without you, the new legislation considers it a transfer of possession. ALL transfers require going through a firearms dealer, paying the transfer fee and a background check for the transferee.
Putting the weapon, even temporarily in someone else's possession, requires a transfer through a dealer. There is no exception for putting them in a friend's truck while moving to your new house or packing them unloaded, locked in a gunsafe into a moving truck.
Any scenario in which your weapon leaves your home without you is considered a transfer. Failure to properly transfer the weapon is a federal crime which can result in a prison term AND WILL RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OF YOUR WEAPON.
In the scenario above, your buddy's truck was used to commit a federal crime and WILL BE CONFISCATED just like with current Fish and Game violations.
EXAMPLE #3
Infractions as above which involve 2 guns of any type are considered weapons trafficking. You will be prosecuted under the same federal laws as a terrorist arms dealer.
EXAMPLE #4
Any of the infractions above (or hundreds of other routine scenarios) may result in federal charges, confiscation of ALL your weapons and being prohibited, like all felons, from ever owning a weapon again.
Please read the text of the bill yourself. Most of it is boring legalese but the sections on transfers and trafficking are critical.
Take a minute to think about all the routine activities like those above that will make you a federal criminal and result in prison time plus the confiscation of your weapons and other property.
A link to the bill is included below on the official Senate website. See Section 122 "Firearms Transfers".
thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin...113:S.649:
Read it and call your congressman's office. Talk to their staff. Tell them how you feel about this.
Keep in mind, none of the above would have stopped the tragedy in Columbine or Newtown . The proposed law makes you a criminal and opens the door for confiscation of your weapons and property for otherwise routine activities.
Think and act. Congress is hoping that you will do neither.
If you found the patience to read the entire text, you also learned that exactly $100 million per year of your tax money is set aside to enforce these restrictions.
Finally, please forward this to your friends who may be affected.

Failure to hit the bulls-eye is not the fault of the target.

-- Regards,Sonny Toledano504-495-3882

Why do I think another executive order is coming from the big Zero's white house!

Hey that sound more or less like what we have now in Oz.

gelandagan I was thinking the same thing applies to us too.

It's probably true Geland,and Elvis!I read about a US communist female anti gun activist **nt from he!! that went to Oz and participated in the evolution of your anti gun bill and became a Oz citizen!Just recently she returned to the US to help out the brady organization in writing the new gun bills to be presented to our favorite traitorus congress critters!A bad pennie comes home again.....................I wonder if she can now be deported for anti American activities?This is one that needs the toe tag stating KIA-in OZ or the US!JMOPHFO!

TRBLSHTR wrote:

female anti gun activist **nt from he!! that went to Oz and participated in the evolution of your anti gun bill and became a Oz citizen!Just recently she returned to the US to help out the brady organization in writing the new gun bills to be presented to our favorite traitorous congress critters!

You must be talking about the one and only Rebeca Peters, since she stepped down in 2010 from leadership of the IANSA (International Action Network on Small Arms) because her group was interfering with the UN's policy and disarming the world especially for self defense. She came back to the US to help expand her goal of disarming the world.

Ironically she stepped down from her position back in 2010 but is still a member of the board of this group. This lady is hell bent on controlling the people's lives around the globe, and the seed is in the white house right now.

I can only speak for myself but I don't believe anyone will disarm my while I am still breathing. No one can legislate away the natural right of self defense and that includes my right to keep and bear arms.
God gave us the right to defend ourselves and only he can take it away.

She must have found the climate ripe in the US.....wonder what the attraction was?....does it start with a big O?

That would be part of it Suz...the main motivation is she is a rampant ANTI who I believe may well have mental health issues.

Excellent article. I have already send it to a bunch of people. Thank you. All the best...
Gil

Your NRA has a shed load more resources than our SSAA ever had, perhaps some in depth investigation and muck raking against this parasite would be possible. She's had her nose in one trough of money or another for years, throw a bright spotlight on her and see what scrivels up in the light. No need to tell the truth, god knows its peddled enough lies to further its own agenda, turnabout is fair play.